当前位置：首页 > 句子词语 > 经典美文> 浅谈当今大学教育的含金量双语美文

浅谈当今大学教育的含金量双语美文

时间：2022-05-06 22:11:37 经典美文收藏本文下载本文

浅谈当今大学教育的含金量双语美文(（共2篇））由网友“scorpio0628”投稿提供，以下是小编帮大家整理后的浅谈当今大学教育的含金量双语美文，欢迎大家收藏分享。

浅谈当今大学教育的含金量双语美文

篇1：浅谈当今大学教育的含金量双语美文

浅谈当今大学教育的含金量双语美文

For many students in the UK today, deciding whether or not to go to university can be as much about affordability as it is about ambition and aspiration.

In times gone by, students in the UK could apply to a university or college safe in the knowledge that, even if they came from a low income family, their tuition fees and some of their living(or maintenance) costs would be covered by a local authority grant. A university education was, in a financial sense, open to all and the number of students attending university grew year on year.

Sadly, it seems, those days are long gone. The turning point came in , when the Labour Government introduced tuition fees of ￡1,000 a year and, instead of giving students a maintenance grant, asked them to cover their own living expenses with a repayable student loan. Only students on the lowest incomes were entitled to a grant.

The flood gates had been opened. As time passed, the ceiling on tuition fees rose, and although applicants from Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales still qualified for varying levels of subsidy, by /10 students in England often found themselves facing tuition fees in excess of ￡3,000 a year.

But the biggest change was still to come. In the Government announced that, from , universities could charge fees of up to ￡9,000 a year. Although the Government sweetened the pill by stating that postgraduates did not have to begin repaying their student loans until they were earning more than ￡21,000 a year, the news created outrage. Many students argued that it was unfair that students should have to begin their work life saddled with huge debt, while others complained that the changes would bring back a class divide to university education. These views were reflected in the number of students applying for a university place, which by January 2012 fell by more than 22,000. The Universities Minister, David Willetts, stood by the decision to increase tuition fees, saying that they would not “put universities’ finance on a sustainable footing” and facilitate “a stronger focus on high quality teaching.”

对于今天英国的许多学生来说，决定是不是去上大学已经不仅仅关乎抱负与渴望，能不能上得起也是他们做出决定的重要因素。

过去，英国的学生可以申请大学，并且确信即使自己来自低收入家庭，学费和一部分生活费也可以由当地的政府部门拨款发放津贴解决。大学教育，从学费角度而言是对所有学生开放的，因此踏入大学校门的学生也逐年增多。

遗憾的是，那些日子一去不复返了。转折点发生在，工党政府开始推行每年需缴1,000英镑大学学费的政策，并且不再向学生发放生活津贴，而是让他们通过需要偿还的学生贷款来解决生活费问题。只有来自最低收入家庭的学生才有资格得到补助。

这类政策一旦推行就会愈演愈烈。随着时间的推移，学费的上限也水涨船高，尽管来自苏格兰、北爱尔兰和威尔士的一些学生仍然够资格申请不同程度的补贴，但到了2009/，英格兰的学生通常都要面临每年超过3,000英镑的`学费支出。

但是更大的巨变还没有到来。到了，政府宣布从起，允许大学收取高至9,000英镑/年的学费。尽管政府为这一做法找的说辞是研究生可以在每年收入21,000英镑以前，不必偿还学生贷款，但这个消息还是触发了众怒。一些学生认为这种政策很不公平，会令他们刚刚开始工作就背上沉重的债务负担，还有学生认为这一政策会在加剧大学期间学生间的阶级分化现象。这些观点也在大学申请人数上反映了出来，到201月，英国申请大学的人数下降了22,000人。英国高等教育大臣大卫?威列茨支持政府提高学费的决定，并称他们不会“把大学财政建立在学生可以付得起的基础上”，而是要全力促进大学“对于教学质量的关注”。

篇2：英国大学反驳教育不公论中英双语

英国大学反驳教育不公论中英双语

Poor pupils 'being set up to fail', top university warns

Forcing universities to admit rising numbers of teenagers with lower entry grades risks setting them up to “fail”, one of Britain's most prestigious institutions has warned.

In an unprecedented intervention, St Andrews University in Scotland said it was “utterly dishonest” to dumb down admissions requirements to create a more socially-balanced student body.

Problems with children’s upbringing and schooling were to blame for a lack of working-class students claiming places at the country’s elite universities, it was claimed.

Stephen Magee, St Andrews’ vice-principal with responsibility for admissions, said that politicians could not continue to “lay responsibility for widening access solely at the door of universities”.

It represents the strongest criticism yet levelled by an individual university towards policies designed to force institutions to boost access to students from the poorest families.

SNP ministers in Edinburgh are demanding that Scottish universities sign new “outcome agreements” that will see them given public funding on the condition they agree to “widen access”.

It reflects a similar process in England where universities have been forced to draw up targets to boost the number of disadvantaged students admitted each year in return for retaining the power to charge up to ￡9,000 in tuition fees.

Prof Les Ebdon, head of the Government’s Office for Fair Access, has told the most sought-after universities to set the most “stretching” targets.

Speaking at a conference in London on Monday, he said the overall number of poor pupils admitted into higher education had increased by a third over the last decade but insisted numbers had failed to rise at the most prestigious institutions.

Data published earlier this year by the Higher Education Statistics Agency revealed that more than half of top universities recruited fewer pupils from the very poorest families in 2010/11. Two-thirds of institutions belonging to the elite Russell Group also recruited proportionally fewer state school students.

St Andrews, whose alumni include the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, has faced fierce criticism in Scotland for admitting only 14 children from the poorest backgrounds last year.

英国一家最具声望的高校提醒称，强迫大学接受越来越多的贫困学生入学会让大学最终“失败”。

位于苏格兰的圣安德鲁斯大学表示，降低入学难度，从而使学生群体在社会化方面更加平衡，这样做是“完全不诚实的”。这是这所大学首次对此予以反驳。

该校表示，工薪阶层的孩子能进入顶尖大学的.机会少，主要是因为孩子的养育和学校教育问题。

圣安德鲁斯大学的副校长史蒂芬-麦基负责该校的招生问题。他说，政治人士不能继续“把各阶层的学生入学差距加大的问题仅仅归咎于学校招生。”

英国有关政策规定高校要增加来自穷困家庭的学生人数，这是来自单个大学对此政策的最强有力的批评。

英国爱丁堡苏格兰民族党的部长们要求苏格兰大学签署新的“结局协议”，按照该协议，如果大学同意“扩大招生来源”，将得到公用基金。

这反映出在英格兰，大学也被要求草拟目标，提高每年来自贫困家庭的大学生人数，以此保留每年收取最多九千英镑学费的权利。

英国政府公平入学办公室的莱斯-艾布顿教授告诉最受欢迎的各所大学，要把目标定到最高。

本周一他在伦敦出席会议时说，在过去十年，读大学的贫困家庭学生总数增加了1/3，但他认为在最顶尖的高校机构，这一数字没能实现增长。

英国高等教育统计局今年早些时候公布的数据显示，在2010至2011年度，超过半数顶尖高校招收的贫困学生减少。最顶尖的罗素大学集团中，2/3的高校招收公立学校的学生比例减少。

圣安德鲁斯大学的毕业生包括威廉王子夫妇，去年因为仅接收了14名贫困学生而受到指责。

★ 美文欣赏读书的乐趣双语