当前位置：首页 > 实用文档 > 其他范文> 写作讲课提纲:怎样搞好调查研究

写作讲课提纲:怎样搞好调查研究

时间：2023-06-10 07:30:40 其他范文收藏本文下载本文

写作讲课提纲:怎样搞好调查研究（集锦2篇）由网友“日向光”投稿提供，以下是小编精心整理的写作讲课提纲:怎样搞好调查研究，仅供参考，希望能够帮助到大家。

写作讲课提纲:怎样搞好调查研究

篇1：写作讲课提纲:怎样搞好调查研究

写作讲课提纲:怎样搞好调查研究

一、努力学习毛泽东等老一辈革命家关于调查研究的思想

一是没有调查就没有发言权。毛泽东同志严肃指出：“你对某个问题没有调查，就停止你对某个问题的发言权。”“离开实际调查就要产生唯心的阶级估量和唯心的工作指导，那么，它的结果，不是机会主义，便是盲动主义。”1941年，毛泽东在《〈农村调查〉的序言和跋》中再次强调：“没有调查就没有发言权，这句话，虽然曾被人讥为‘狭隘经验论’的，我却至今不悔；不但不悔，我仍然坚持没有调查是没有发言权的。”辩证唯物主义的认识论要求主观和客观、理论和实践、知和行的具体的历史的统一，而实现这个统一的基本途径和方法就是研究。

二是调查研究是谋事之道，成事之基。这是江泽民同志的话。重视调查研究，理论联系实际，是正确决策的基础。是否注重调查研究，不仅仅是个工作方法问题，而且是关系到能否在斗争中开创新局面的思想路线问题，甚至是关系到革命事业的兴衰和党的命运的重大原则问题。

三是调查研究是坚持党的群众路线的根本要求。毛泽东始终认为：群众是真正的英雄，而我们自己则往往是幼稚可笑的，不了解这一点，就不能得到起码的知识。他强调调查研究要有满腔的热情，眼睛向下的决心，求知的渴望，放下臭架子、甘当不小学生的精神。邓小平说：所谓群众路线，包括调查研究。江泽民强调：县以上各级领导每年至少抽出一两个月的时间，深入基层，去农村要到村到户，去工厂要到到车间班组，了解群众在想什么，吃什么，欢迎什么，反对什么，这样在工作指导上才有可能真正做急群众所急，想群众所想，真正切合实际。

四是调查研究是领导机关的基本任务。毛泽东说：领导机关的基本任务有两件大事，一是了解情况，二是掌握政策。陈云同志说：领导机关制定政策，要用百分之九十以上的时间作调查研究工作，最后讨论作决定用不到百分之十的'时间就够了。毛泽东1930年说：迈开你的双脚，到你的工作范围的各部分各地方去走走，学个孔夫子的‘每事问’，任凭什么才力小也能解决问题的各种必要材料，问题就是这样子解决了。所以说，调查研究是做好机关工作的重要前提，是第一位的职责。存在问题：①认为自己有部队和基层经验，情况熟悉，不调查也能应付一阵子；②从事某一行业务多年，已经“精通了”，不调查也能讲出个一、二、三来；③机关工作老一套，今年看去年，不调查也能比照葫芦画个瓢；④工作太忙，抽不出时间搞调查；⑤基层官兵水平低，调查也反映不了多少思想和情况；⑥现在部队的问题都是老问题，解决起来难度大，调查也没用；⑦这方面的情况别人已经调查了，把材料要来看看就行了；⑧调查研究主要是领导的事，自己不在决策圈里，搞得多少无所谓。

二、掌握科学的调查研究方法

1、要端正思想方法。调查研究是主观见之于客观的过程。端正调查研究的思想方法，根本的就是要坚持唯物论的反映论

2、调查之前要做必要的准备。（1）要准备调查提纲。（座谈、个别了解、检查、统计、详细了解）（2）要事先搞一点学习。（3）调查带有专业性或技术性的问题时，要吸收懂行的部门参加。（4）要注意通气。

3、调查的对象要有广泛性和代表性。

4、要学会用多种手段搞调查。一是要多看。二是要多找个人谈。三是要注意搞些必要的统计。四是要注意查看一些原始记录。

5、要重视听反面意见。陈云同志说：领导干部听话要特别注意听反面的话。相同的意见谁也敢讲，容易听得到；不同的意见，常常由于领导人有虚心，人家不敢讲，不容易听到。事物是很复杂的，要想得到比较全面的正确的了解，那就必须听取各种不同的意见，经过周密的分析，把它集中起来。调查研究有各种各们的方法，找有各种不同的人交换意见，也是一种方法，而且是一种重要的方法。

6、要着眼宏观。提高宏观分析、宏观控制、宏观决策的能力。调查研究必须站在全局的高度观察问题，分析问题，提出对策。做到两条：一条是要跟上形势，即跟上全党全军的大步调，及时了解国际国内形势的变化，了解党中央和中央军委提出的一些重大方针政策，尤其要了解和掌握形势的变化给政治工作带来的新情况和新问题；另一条是处理好两个关系，即中心与业务、综合调查与专题调查的关系。多搞一点综合调查、综合分析，把各项具体工作放到某个大局的位置上综合考虑，才能取得实在管用的研究成果，才能收到综合效益。

三、提高拟定调查报告的能力

任务：一是调查了解某一个单位或某一项工作的基本情况；二是调查总结某一个单位、某项工作的经验教训；三是调查了解某一个先进典型的事迹和经验；四是调查核实某人或某单位的情况。

1、要多看多读一些好的范文。

2、善于提炼主题。

3、学会事实说话。

4、正确使用观点和材料。

篇2：GRE写作：怎样准备提纲

GRE写作：怎样准备提纲

1、什么时候开始练习在模考时加入提纲?

比较适合的是在最后10天到一周的样子。因为这首先需要在一定高强度的写作练习之后，再者，需要对题目已经有了一定的把握。很多的提纲在之前都大体列过。然后在限时中加入提纲的写作。

2、用多长时间列提纲?

我的经验是ISSUE总体比ARGU短。ISSUE大体要2-3分钟，ARGU怎么都要3分钟。可能要5分钟。

3、提纲里都要包含些什么?

对ISSUE来说，读第一遍题目时把关键词提出来，接着将核心话题列出来，根据这个话题开始一条一条列出你要写的东西;ARGU来说，因为题目比较长，所以读题的时间就要比前者长。第一遍建议先把每一个意群讲的是什么简要提出来，排上序号;第二从这些小短句分析其文章结构和主要错误;第三把自己对错误的阐述顺序列出来。这样差不多是可以的了。

4、列提纲的一些技巧

需要在练习中找到自己的记录法，哪种缩写是自己看得明了的。要记出来的摘要最后自己还要辨析几分钟。建议在平时列提纲的时候就有意识的做一下限定时间练习，看2-3分钟能不能把大体的框架列出来。

GRE写作满分范文赏析

“Both the development of technological tools and the uses to which humanity has put them have created modern civilizations in which loneliness is ever increasing.”

The technological tools we as a society have developed are not in themselves positive or negative, they are just that, tools. The uses, however, are definitely a different story. Computers, I believe at one time, were developed to save us time. Do our work more quickly for us so that we could have more leisure time to spend doing those things we enjoy. We have found now, especially those of us that are parents, that all of the leisure time we have gained is either spent watching our children learn things on the computer or creating our own unique something on the family computer. For one thing, it has become a very fun item, the computers have become more than just work related technological tools. The amount of human interaction is limited, because people in general are spending much of their leisure time doing solo on the computer. In the past, it was common for the new young exectutive to get a membership to the exercise club as a perk, where he could socialize with the upper crust. Now the new young exec. gets a car phone or a portable fax, so that he can work from whereever he is, usually doing that solo trip to somewhere. Given these as examples, I would tend to agree with the statement that lonliness has increased as a direct result.

Comments:

This response is limited in its analysis of the issue.

The writer clearly expresses the idea that “the technological tools we as a society have developed are not in themselves positive or negative.” However, the response provides only limited support for the position. The two examples are loosely connected and undeveloped; for example, the relevance of the “young executive” example is not clear because there is no transition from the preceding example of the computer. The conclusion, one sentence long, simply restates the claim made in the topic.

The awkward sentences are evidence of a limited fluency. Greater use of compound sentences could help eliminate structural problems and facilitate the communication of ideas (e.g., sentences 3 and 4 could be combined).

For all of these reasons, this is not an adequate response. It received a score of 3.

GRE写作满分范文赏析

“Both the development of technological tools and the uses to which humanity has put them have created modern civilizations in which loneliness is ever increasing.”

Looking at the above statement, I see a lot of truth to the statement . There are many ways that society has used the advanced technology in order to isolate themselves. It may or may not be a consious move, but the results are all the same. The isolation occurs in a variety of ways and in all different areas. By computerizing factories, there are more and more people working long hours by themselves, with there only companion as a computer monitor. Although the company may be getting better production, the question that needs to be ask is at what cost to their employees.

It is not only the management of big factories that are responsible for this isolation. This lonliness can be seen in many other settings. With the growing popularity of the television, the nation is seeing a decline in families talking and an increase in watching the television. Not only can this result in a generation of “coach potatoes”, it is also causes less communication and a feeling of isolation from everyone that a person cares about.

So far technology has entered the work place and the home, it has also entered the social relm. When you go to order food in the drive-thru, who is or better yet what is it that you talk to? It is a machine, although there is a person on the other end, you are still reciting your order to a machine. If it is ten o'clock at night and you need money, there are ATM's. All of these gadgets may be very nice and convient, but they result in lack of human contact.

Although it might be easy to blame technolgy for our feelings of loneliness, it is just a cop out. By looking at all the ways technology causes isolation, it is still people who choose to use these convenient methods. If a person wants to have human contact, all they have to do is go inside to the bank or go inside the resturaunt to order. What it basically boils down to, is that it is our choice whether or not we use technology. It is a scary thought to think maybe one day we might live in a society where you will never have to leave your house. That by using FAX machines, computers, modems, and the telephone a person would never have to have human contact to get their job done. The thing is that if that is not what we as a society wants, we are the ones to speak out and change the outcome.

Comments:

This is a competent discussion of the issue. The position presented in the first paragraph -- that “there are many ways that society has used the advanced technology in order to isolate themselves” -- is adequately sustained, but the examples are not always clearly relevant (e.g., in the case of paragraph one's “computerizing” of factories, the decision to use the technology is not made by the individual worker.) Also, the reasoning is not developed as fully as it would be in a response at the score level of 6 or 5.

While organization is adequate, the response lacks the organized coherence of ideas that exemplify a 5 essay. Transitions, within and between paragraphs, are not always logical. The last paragraph could be much more clearly focused: since several sentences repeat the same idea -- that “it is our choice whether or not we use technology” -- and the purpose or meaning of others (e.g., the last) is not immediately clear.

In general, ideas are presented clearly, although awkward phrasing sometimes contributes to vagueness (e.g., “By looking at all the ways technology causes isolation, it is still people who choose to use these convenient methods”). Lack of sentence variety seems to inhibit the communication of ideas (e.g., many short sentences are often used where one or two compound ones could make the points more effectively). Overall, however, this is an adequate response to the topic.