当前位置：首页 > 实用文档 > 其他范文> 官方道歉信

官方道歉信

时间：2022-06-20 09:33:11 其他范文收藏本文下载本文

官方道歉信（合集8篇）由网友“李好奇”投稿提供，以下是小编收集整理的官方道歉信，仅供参考，希望对大家有所帮助。

官方道歉信

篇1：官方道歉信

6月15日，中国男子足球队在与泰国男子足球队的热身赛中以1：5失利，引起了广大球迷和群众的强烈不满。从这场比赛的过程和结果看，是不正常的、不可接受的，完全没有体现中国国家队应有的精神风貌和水平。这场比赛的失利，并不仅仅是技战术层面的原因，更是思想、精神、意志、队伍管理方面的原因。赛后，国家体育总局领导对国家队本场比赛的表现提出了严厉批评，也对中国足协的工作提出了严厉的批评。

本场比赛后，国家队、国家队管理部、中国足协进行了认真总结和深刻反思。中国足协认为，这场比赛的大比分失利，原因是多方面的，但无论是教练、队员还是其他方面的客观原因，都不是中国足协推卸责任的理由，作为中国足球的管理机构，中国足协必须对本场比赛的失利承担最主要的责任。对于广大群众和领导的批评，中国足协诚恳接受并将认真整改。

足球是深受广大群众喜爱的项目，中国足球长期落后，令人痛心。近年来，在党和政府的`关怀下，在社会各界的支持下，在国家体育总局的正确领导下，足球反赌扫黑、治理整顿取得了积极成效，人们对于足球发展的信心逐步恢复，足球发展的气氛开始回暖。而中泰之战的耻辱性失利，极大打击了广大球迷和群众的足球热情，对足球的健康发展带来极大的负面影响，也极大损害了中国体育的良好形象。在此，中国足协向热爱、支持足球事业的广大球迷、群众、赞助商、社会各界表示诚恳道歉！

中国足协决心汲取“6.15”的深刻教训，以此为鉴，加强中国足协队伍建设和制度建设，改进作风，提升素质，加强国家队管理和教育，激发运动队和全行业为国争光的政治责任感，为改变中国足球的落后面貌务实工作、努力奋斗。

篇2：官方邀请函

洛阳XXXXXX公司

×X年×月×日

这是商务礼仪活动邀请函的主体内容，标题除了文种“邀请函”、事由“××广告公司年终客户答谢会”字样外，还出现了活动主题标语“财富主角”；正文亦符合礼仪文书的行文要求，可谓是事务与礼仪的完美结合。

商务礼仪活动邀请函的回执则常采用表格的形式，将需要被邀请方填写的事项逐项列出。一般包括参会企业名称、参会人员姓名、性别、职务、民族习惯、参会要求(如参与某项专题活动)；被邀请方的联系人、联系电话、电子邮件地址等。礼仪活动组织部门的名称、联系人、联系电话、电子邮件地址、企业网址等。

篇3：官方兽医年终总结

在区畜牧兽医局和地方党委、政府的正确领导下，通过兽医站全体职工的共同努力，紧紧围绕畜牧兽医局年初下达的各项目标任务，突出重点，很抓落实，以示范带动为引领，全面推进全镇畜牧业整体发展，取得了一定的成绩，现总结如下：

一、指导思想

全站统一思想，使大家认识到，进一步转变服务观念，以群众满意为标尺，认真开展日常工作，推动全镇畜牧业持续健康发展；深入贯彻落实《食品安全法》、《农产品质量安全法》、《畜牧法》、《动物防疫法》、《饲料和饲料添加剂管理条例《兽药管理条例》等法律法规。

二、突出重点，切实完成各项工作

（一）切实抓好春防工作。我站把春防工作作为今年上半年年度工作的重中之重，同时分派技术精干人员，采取分片分社，责任到头，严格按照“村不漏组、组不漏户、户不漏畜、畜不漏针”的标准要求，建立了免疫档案等；确保了免疫密度和质量。

（二）抓好检疫及食品安全工作。加强检疫监管，严格落实产地检疫和屠宰检疫“四到位”，要求屠宰点的检疫员严格执行各项规章制度，准时到岗，按照检疫操作规程进行检疫，严格杜绝不合格肉品出场。上半年，全镇共实施产地检疫生猪1955头、禽类xx羽、屠宰检疫猪1864头，全镇共收检疫费13943元。同时加强质量检验检测，认真完成饲料、兽药、养殖及屠宰环节“瘦肉精”等各项质量安全监测任务，扩大抽查覆盖面，提高检测频次和密度，其中共用“瘦肉精”检测卡221张。

（三）切实开展惠民工程。

一是加强宣传。通过村社干部，以会代训等形式，切实宣传好中央财政实施能繁母猪死亡保险、向规模化发展畜牧业以及退耕还林后续产业化发展等惠民工程，鼓励调动农民的积极性；

二是严格执行惠民工程。及时落实相关惠民工程的补贴等。

三、狠抓标准化、规模化生产发展

为大力倡导鼓励标准化、规模化养殖发展要求，今年我站在年初推进了实施方案，使得全镇生猪养殖大户有11户、养牛大户有2户、养羊大户xx户、养鹅大户6户、1个养鹅基地、养鸡大户2户。

四、存在的.不足。

1、是农户对养殖积极性不高，市场价格不稳定、发展不平衡。

2、是防检管理工作有待于加强，由于交通条件和现有体制，导致防检管理工作难度不断增大。

五、下半年的工作打算：

通过半年深入开展群众路线教育实践活动，全站人员的学习意识得到了进一步加强，服务宗旨意识进一步增强，工作的自觉性有了很大的提高。纵观半年的工作，虽然取得了一定成效，但还存在着许多不足，同上级的要求还有差距，我们将以此为契机，紧紧围绕全镇经济发展的大局，认真做好服务工作，努力提高工作效率，为群众提供优质、高效、及时的服务，为全镇的畜牧业增效、农民增收作出新的贡献。

篇4：UGNX6.0官方教程

UG NX 6是Unigraphics Solutions公司（简称UGS）提供的集CAD/CAE/CAM集成系统的最新版本，它在UG NX5的基础上做了许多改进，为当今世界最先进的计算机辅助设计、分析和制作软件之一。此软件集建模、制图、加工、结构分析、运动分析和装配等功能于一体，广泛应用与航天、航空、汽车、造船等领域，显著地提高了相关工业的生产率。本UGNX6.0官方教程主要介绍UG NX 6软件的基础知识及基本操作等。

UG软件作为UGS公司的旗舰产品，是当今最流行的CAD/CAE/CAM一体化软件，为用户提供了最先进的集成技术和一流实践经验的解决方案，能够把任何产品的构思付诸实际，

UG NX6是UG系列软件的最新版本，7月发布。其不仅具有UG以前版本的强大功能，而且用户界面更加灵活。并由多个应用模块组成，使用这些模块，可以实现工程设计、绘图、装配、辅助制造和分析一体化。随着版本的不断更新和功能的不断补充，使其向专业化和智能化不断迈进，例如机械布管、电器布线、航空钣金、车辆设计等。

第1章 UG NX6基础知识第2章 UG NX 6基本操作作第3章创建草图第4章曲线功能第5章实体建模第6章曲面建模第7章装配第8章工程制图基础第9章视图管理第10章工程图标注和符号第11章 UG建模实例—齿轮泵建模第12章 UG建模实例—油泵壳体的设计装配

篇5：实习总结(官方)

实习总结(官方) -实习学习总结

第一次实习，地点是人们平日里觉得甚是神秘的电视台。实习内容是编导，对于编导的这一说法觉得很是新鲜，日后才深刻体会，这个平常节目里被喊为小编或者是导演的工作，与生活是如此贴近。我所在的节目组《健康时间》，我所做过的工作有听同期、写稿子、录口播、剪片子、拍外景、跟后期。可以说一个编导该做的我都很努力地去学。在电视台里，如若不是外拍便是在3楼机房，刚开始的不熟悉，不仅是对工作还是对实习老师，因为觉得融不入工作的圈子，始终觉得自己是个工作以外的人，因此很少到19楼办公室。也因为“常驻”3楼机房，一连看了好几位老师编片，也几乎每位老师都教过我怎么编片。编片就是对拍摄素材进行剪辑，使之串联成播出的成片，这也是每位编导所要掌握的最基本技术。一开始看到陌生的机器，觉得无从下手，再加上每位老师编片时“绚烂”的.手法，不得不令我佩服，也暗暗思付什么时候才可以学会，什么时候才可以自己编片。看了好几位老师编片的过程，也聆听了他们的教诲，对于编片的步骤已然烂熟于胸，但当老师拿过两盘带子要我自己编编看的时候，依旧不知道从哪里下手。有一天，一位老师要我亲自剪片，而他在旁边告诉我剪片的步骤，这一次的实践将我所掌握的理论串了起来，一回生二回熟，我也算慢慢学会了片子的剪辑，到最后能够独立进行剪辑。想说，实践真的是检验真理的唯一标准，要想看看自己到底学会了什么，唯有实践。也只有真正去实践了，才知道自己还有哪些不足，还有哪些需要请教。可以说学会编片是我实习编导以来对自己最大的肯定。实习一个多月，可以说最最紧张，压力最大的是最后一个礼拜，为了自己的实习作品努力着。并非说前面的工作不上心，毕竟最后一期节目是自己担纲，各种细节自己把握，没有谁能够帮忙，有一种只许成功不许失败的悲壮。从前期准备到后期成片，我很高兴尽管很多时候是一个人走过，但周围还是有那么多人的鼓励。还记得在节目播出的那天，因为是晚上播出，所以白天大家都在赶片子的后期，连午餐都错过了。不会忘记成片出来那一刻的放松，终于，完成了。实习的经历是宝贵的。很高兴在实习结束的时候可以大声地说，我无愧于这一个月，我努力用最认真最负责的态度去面对每个老师交给我的任务。即使是最没技术含量的同期，我会也会在最快时间内完成，并且保证没有错误。有一位同在实习的同学告诉我，他说，他还蛮欣赏我的，因为我在面对工作时候的专注有超乎年龄的感觉，是其他实习生所不具备的。我不禁要将这种褒奖归功到中学时期的学生干部生涯。那时候身为学生会主席，很多任务必须高质量、高速度完成，也许如此，锻炼了我在工作上严谨、追求完美的态度。曾经很长一段时间以为，集中留给我的，不过是主席的虚名而已，于我而言并没有什么实质性的东西。现在终于明白，原来，一切尽在潜移默化中。

篇6：新GREIssue官方

Issue test 3

The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.

Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement above and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how those considerations shape your position.

The following sample issue response received a score of 6:

Passion is clearly necessary for a truly great idea to take hold among a people—passion either on the part of the original thinker, the audience, or ideally both. The claim that the most lucrative subject matter for inspiring great ideas is “commonplace things” may seem initially to be counterintuitive. After all, aren’t great ideas usually marked by their extraordinary character? While this is true, their extraordinary character is as often as not directly derived from their insight into things that had theretofore gone unquestioned. While great ideas certainly can arise through seemingly pure innovation... say, for example, Big Bang cosmology, which developed nearly all of its own scientific and philosophical precepts through its own process of formation, it is nevertheless equally true that such groundbreaking thought was, and is, still largely a reevaluation of previous assumptions to a radical degree... after all, the question of the ultimate nature of the universe, and man’s place in it, has been central to human thought since the dawn of time. Commonplace things are, additionally, necessary as material for the generation of “the best ideas” since certainly the success among an audience must be considered in evaluating the significance and quality of an idea.

The advent of Big Bang cosmology, which occured in rudimentary form almost immediately upon Edwin Hubble’s first observations at the Hooker telescope in California during the early 20th century, was the most significant advance in mankind’s understanding of the universe in over 400 years. The seemingly simple fact that everything in the universe, on the very large scale, is moving away from everything else in fact betrays nearly all of our scientific knowledge of the origins and mechanics of the universe. This slight, one might even say commonplace, distortion of tint on a handful of photographic plates carried with it the greatest challenge to Man’s general, often religiously reinforced, conception of the nature of the world to an extent not seen since the days of Galileo. Not even Charles Darwin’s theory, though it created more of a stir than Big Bang cosmology, had such shattering implications for our conceptions of the nature of our reality. Yet it is not significant because it introduced the question of the nature of what lies beyond Man’s grasp. A tremendous number of megalithic ruins, including the Pyramids both of Mexico and Egypt, Stonehenge, and others, indicate that this question has been foremost on humankind’s collective mind since time immemorial. Big Bang cosmology is so incredibly significant in this line of reasoning exactly because of the degree to which it changed the direction of this generally held, constantly pondered, and very ancient train of thought.

Additionally, there is a diachronic significance to the advent of Big Bang cosmology, which is that, disregarding limitations such as the quality of optical devices available and the state of theoretical math, it could have happened at any point in time. That is to say, all evidence points to roughly the same raw intellectual capacity for homo sapiens throughout our history, our progress has merely depended upon the degree of it that a person happens to inherit, a pace that has been increasing rapidly since the industrial revolution. Yet this discovery had to happen at a certain point in time or another—it cannot have been happening constantly or have never happened yet still be present—and this point in time does have its own significance. That significance is precisely the fact that the aforementioned advent must have occurred at precisely the point in time at which it truly could have occured—that is to say, it marks the point in our history when we had progressed sufficiently to begin examining, with remarkable substantiated acuity, the workings of the universe across distances that would take millions of human lifetimes to reach or to traverse. The point for the success of this advent must necessarily have been, additionally, the point at which the audience concerned was capable and prepared to accept such a radical line of reasoning.

Both factors, a radical, passionate interpretation of the commonplace and the preparedness to accept such an interpretation, are necessary for the formulation of a truly great idea. If the passion is absent from an inquiry by the thinker or by the bulk of an audience, the idea will die out if it comes to fruition at all. If the material is not sufficiently commonplace to be considered by an informed audience of sufficient size, the same two hazards exist. Given these two factors, the idea must still be found palatable and interesting by the audience if it is to hope to gain a foothold and eventually establish itself in a significant fashion.

Comments on sample essay receiving score of 6:

This outstanding response presents a cogent, well-articulated analysis of the complexities of the issue by arguing that (1) great ideas develop from commonplace observations that are interpreted in a radical way; and (2) passion is required of both thinkers and the audience in order for great ideas to take hold.

The argument is based on an extended example (Big Bang cosmology) and has two parts. The first part defines “commonplace things” as universal questions (i.e., the quest to understand the cosmos is commonplace, though complex, because it is an ancient and universal question) and places Big Bang cosmology in context with the scientific breakthroughs of Galileo and the Pyramids of ancient Mexico and Egypt.

The second part explains Big Bang as the result of a convergence of factors: both thinkers and the audience must be ready to reevaluate “previous assumptions” and accept “radical, passionate interpretations.”

The argument’s careful line of reasoning is strengthened by appropriate transitions between paragraphs (“Additionally,” “Both factors, a radical, passionate interpretation of the commonplace and the preparedness to accept such an interpretation, are necessary for the formulation of a truly great idea,” etc.) and within paragraphs (“Not even Charles Darwin’s,” “Yet,” “that is to say,” etc.). Fluent and precise language—advent, rudimentary, diachronic, shattering implications, megalithic ruins—and effective sentence variety also characterize this response as outstanding. Finally, despite the presence of minor errors (overuse of comma and inconsistent use of ellipses in paragraph 1), this response demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English.

篇7：新GREIssue官方

The following sample issue response received a score of 5:

The statement above comes from the perspective that the best thinkers, inventors, and innovators are the way that they are because they explore passionately the interesting things around them. Yes, I would say that this is definitely true.I understand best the things that interest me, but it is only the things with which I am familiar with and understand in my surroundings. It would be difficult to take passionate interest in the things which I did not have available in my environment.

For example, let’s consider some “idea” people in history. The person who invented the basketball hoop, or the game of volleyball, or ice skates, all had interest in those things before they had their brilliant ideas. I do know that the inventor of the basketball hoop used to coach a basketball team of young boys, and they would throw the ball into a fruit basket that was nailed to the wall. Obviously, a basket has a bottom to it, and they would have to fish it out after every successful throw. So he had the brilliant idea of cutting out the bottom of the basket. It seems so simple to us now, but nobody had ever played basketball like that in his day.

The phrase, “commonplace things” can be rather misleading, I believe. I think every person has slightly different “commonplace things” in their environment depending on their interests, their financial status, and availability of items. What is commonplace for one person may never be known by another. I take passionate interest in things having to do with sewing using patterns, fabrics and threads. However, my mother and grandmother are excellent seamstresses and I had the availability of learning from them. It was a “commonplace thing” for me. I have had some wonderful ideas come out of my passion for this kind of art.

Orville and Wilbur Wright had a passionate interest in things having to do with flight, a rather ordinary thing for the sorts of birds who can fly with their wings, but certainly not people. If I had lived during the Wright brothers’ time, I would probably not have had the same passionate interest in figuring out how to make humans fly, because it is not something that I would have thought possible. But their dreams and visionary possibilities were much bigger than mine would have been at that time. They not only had a passionate interest but they were willing to experiment, to risk financial ruin and ridicule, and even put their lives on the line. So while it is true that the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commplace things, there also has to be an element of daring to challenge “norms” and not being able to just accept things as they are. There has to be a desire to make things better and to improve on the present.

There also has to be the element of not being afraid of failure. Most ideas do inevitably fail. Einstein is viewed today as being one of the most brilliant thinkers and “idea” people in all of history. But nobody really talks about how many times his ideas failed. The number is quite amazing. Many people are afraid of failure, so even though they make take a passionate interest in something commonplace, and have some great ideas, they may never carry them through because of uncertainty that they would work. We must be willing to try!

So, yes, it is true that the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things, because these are the things that we know, these are the things that we understand, and the things that we want to explore in even more depths. But there must be more elements involved than just taking interest in something. We must be willing to face risks of many kinds in order to separate the ideas that fail from the ones that will triumphantly succeed.

Comments on sample essay receiving score of 5:

This strong response presents a well- considered analysis of the complexities of the issue by arguing that great ideas come, not only from a passionate interest in the commonplace, but also from great imagination and a willingness to succeed.

The logic of the response unfolds very smoothly: paragraph 3 explores the term “commonplace” and offers support for the prompt’s position; paragraphs 4 and 5 discuss the related issues of imagination, willingness to experiment, and overcoming failure. The examples are well chosen and generally well developed.

Paragraph 2 offers a relevant, though predictable, sports example (invention of basketball hoop) to examine how commonplace things/familiarity can spark great ideas. A personal example is used in paragraph 3 to further explore the definition of “commonplace” and illustrate how the term is relative to financial status and availability (though only the concept of availability is developed in this example). Paragraph 2 logically extends into paragraph 3, and the same connection is seen between paragraphs 4 and 5.

In paragraph 4 the Wright brothers are used to argue that great ideas also come from imagination and a willingness to experiment. The final example, in which Einstein is offered to illustrate the necessity of overcoming failure, is not as fully developed as the others. The respondent does not explain what failures Einstein endured or how he overcame them, which makes the example less compelling. Overall, the analysis demonstrated in the examples is “perceptive and clear,” but not “insightful and cogent” as required for a score of 6. While the response expresses ideas clearly, using appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety, it does not use language as fluently and precisely as would a typical 6. Occasional wordiness/ awkwardness could be avoided with more precise diction (e.g., “There also has to be the element of not being afraid of failure,” or “I have had some wonderful ideas come out of my passion for this kind of art”).

篇8：新GREIssue官方

The following sample issue response received a score of 3:

How do new knowledge came into being? Sometimes it stemed from exsiting knowledge. Sometimes it was born all out of sudden. Both ways seem work well. As I see through this question, I believe that what plays a key role in creating new ideas is a passionate interest.

Throughout history, a myriad of examples help prove the importance of interest. Edison, the greatest inventors in the world, possessed a sharp interest ever since his childhood. In his eyes, every common things were full of mysteries. It was his unique interest which helped him look into the machanism of things around therefore new iders came into his mind and, changed into conceret machines facilitating our lives. Another famous example is that of Newton. A riped apple from a tree fell onto his head one afternoon. For ordinary people, this kind of trivial instance would slip off their mind at once. However, Newton lost hisself in thought of the relation between objects. Finally he found gravitation and opened up a new era of physics.

On the other hand, without interest, the opportunity of great discoveries will pass by. Most people are experiencing ordinary lives everyday. Why don’t they come up with great ideas? Because interest is a state of skeptism, a state in which we do not stop to disclose the truth beneath a surface of commonplaces. Interest means the ability to explore the internal corelations. Therefore, with a passiontae interest, those commonplace things are no longer commonplace, and new ideas are created.

From what have been discussed above, we can see that interest serves as force to propell the exploration of unknowns, to perfect the structure of human knowledge, and to move towards the ultimate truth.

Comments on sample essay receiving score of 3:

This limited response demonstrates some competence in its analysis and in conveying meaning but is obviously flawed.

The response agrees with the prompt by arguing that a passionate interest allows people to see beyond the commonplace and create new ideas (paragraphs 1 and 3). However, the response is limited in presenting and developing this position.

In paragraph 2 the response offers two relevant but underdeveloped examples to illustrate the importance of interest in generating ideas.

The Edison example is not persuasive because its development is limited to generalities (“common things were full of mysteries...which helped him look into the machanism of things...therefore new iders came into his mind and, changed into conceret machines”). The response does not provide specific examples of the common “things” that interested Edison nor does it discuss any of Edison’s particular ideas. Thus, it does little to advance the response’s position. The Newton example is not penalized for historical inaccuracy. However, like the previous example, it is overly general and underdeveloped.

The response also contains an accumulation of language errors (in usage, word choice, and sentence structure) that often result in a lack of clarity. For instance, the rhetorical device used in paragraph 1 contains frequent errors that render it ineffective. The imprecise language use in the Newton example is particularly unsettling: “Newton lost hisself in thought of the relation between objects. Finally he found gravitation and opened up a new era of physics.” While these errors do not generally interfere with meaning, they constitute a lack of language control that precludes a score of 4.