考研英语备考 英语阅读多长时间合适?

时间:2022-05-05 23:37:03 其他范文 收藏本文 下载本文

考研英语备考 英语阅读多长时间合适?((锦集6篇))由网友“恨反派過分美麗”投稿提供,下面是小编整理过的考研英语备考 英语阅读多长时间合适?,欢迎您阅读分享借鉴,希望对您有所帮助。

考研英语备考 英语阅读多长时间合适?

篇1:考研英语备考 英语阅读多长时间合适?

16分钟是可以的速度,考研阅读要求精读,不能像4级考试那样单一的追求速度。考研英语阅读一般读题和做题的时间应该是相同的,每个选项都要回到原文定位定位,以保证它的准确性,因此是比较消耗时间的,建议做题时间是15-18分钟。如果只是追求过线,翻译的时间可以尽量的拿去给阅读,因为翻译难答,全国平均分才3分左右,基础不好的同学还是不要只望了,不如把更多的心思花在阅读和作文上,加上完型和7选5,英语一定能过。

其实,现在做考研阅读慢没有关系。因为几乎没有哪一个人一开始就做的很快,而且对于考研阅读最重要的是精读细读,而不是一味的追求速度。

现在速度慢,正确率不高这是很正常的。想我刚开始做英语阅读真题的时候,有时候读完了,最后竟然全错了,当时的我和你一样有种想死的感觉,但又没有办法。调整了下心态又继续奋战了,一直坚持到现在,现在速度也提高了,基本上是20多分钟,而且正确率也提高了,基本是3到4个。而且据专家分析,考研阅读的时间最好是 18~20分钟,所以不要太追求速度,我觉得20分钟就好了,呵呵!

所以对于真题要反复研究,尤其是阅读,对于文中的'疑难句、不认识的单词,文中经典的句型,出题思路都要研究。这样一直研究下去,知道看到考研真题,就有一种亲切感,习惯这样的出题思路,这样我想最后肯定会成功的,会达到自己想的高度的,我一直坚信这点。虽然这可能难以达到,但再难也要这么做!!!

篇2:考研英语阅读备考指南

考研英语中阅读部分是重头戏,阅读理解是考研英语中分值最大的一项,所以有“得阅读者得天下”之说,但是很多同学可能会遇到觉得文章读懂了却做错题的情况。那么针对这种情况,对于考研学子,阅读要早规划,下面我们介绍一下阅读的备考指南:

一、了解考研英语阅读文章的特点

1. 了解考研英语阅读的来源,有针对性的复习阅读

六大期刊来源: The Economist Time Scientific American Harvard Business Review Business Week Newsweek 2. 体裁: 议论文;说明文 3. 题材:社会生活;商业经济;文化教育;科普知识

二、准备词汇,基础较差的考生更要提前做准备,寒假到暑假词汇要记忆三至五遍,

三、寻找阅读语料,三月份开始阅读,针对考研阅读真题的来源,我们从期刊上选出阅读语料进行阅读学习以便巩固词汇及提高语感,也可以买本阶梯阅读类的书。

不要为了考试才去读,对于准备时间比较充分的朋友,应该早早就开始逼迫自己每天花十到十五分钟去读一些英语文章,特别是要选一些略带有专业性质的文章,这样可以增加自己的知识面和敏感度,这个工作坚持一两个月后,对加强自己的语感和猜测能力是很有帮助的,

备考资料

四、提高阅读速度,首先要逼迫自己有选择地读不同专业不同内容的英语文章,从平时开始,在做题以外的时候自然地去读。当你自然地理解了一篇东西,哪怕是猜测到一些大意,这个速度比硬梆梆地去啃是快很多的。

五、研究真题阅读,包括分析考研真题阅读题型及阅读中的长难句。考试意义上的阅读理解是一种定向理解,即要求考生在阅读短文后回答命题人设计的理解题,与考题无关的内容则可以不理解。站在命题人角度去分析阅读理解题题型,并掌握不同题型的特点及答题要求。阅读理解题型大致可以归纳为以下五类:事实细节题,推理判断题,观点态度题,主旨大意题和语义理解题。

六、精心选择模拟题,时间充裕的话,12月底可以做一套权威性的模拟题,以便查漏补缺。

本人根据自己对考研真题阅读多年分析的经验总结了阅读题的备考指南,学生通过此方法的学习及练习后,均能达到可观的分数,在此拿出来与大家分享,希望广大学员早点开始备考,认真学习,耐心练习。最后老师恭祝您快乐学习,顺利通过考研!

篇3:考研英语备考

考研英语备考:打好基础最重要

考研英语是靠长期积累才见成效的学科,因此大家在复习过程中,一定要注重对于基础部分的巩固和跟进。俗话说基础不牢,地动山摇。考研英语的基础无谓乎是词汇和语法两大部分内容的背诵和学习。

词汇

建议大家将词汇的学习贯穿到考研复习始终。尽管我们从小学就开始学习英语,开始记单词,但是这里仍然要提一下学习词汇的注意事项。因为,考研英语复习与此前的学习最大的不同是,计划和实施完全要依靠个人督促和跟进。这就要求我们在最短的时间里制定出最有效的学习计划,并且掌握最有效的学习方法去实施。

记忆方法可以灵活多样,词缀法,联想法等,只要有利于记忆的都可以用。但务必要确保每个单词有意识复习三遍以上。然后通过做往年试题来随机复习,查漏补缺。词汇复习尽量利用自己的零散时间,要降低一次背诵的期望值,重复是解决遗忘的最好办法。另外单独背单词和背诵经典文章可以相结合,在语境中进一步体会单词含义,也为下一步提高阅读速度和写好文章打下基础。大家可以到相关网站下载一个电子版的词汇大纲,删掉自己熟悉的词汇、短语,然后打印剩下的内容,做成单词卡片(A4的纸裁成4张,每张14个单词)带在身上,随时随地进行复习,几分钟就能复习一张单词卡。

语法

语法是很多同学的弱项环节,尤其是对长难句结构的划分。句子成分划分不准确,直接会影响对整个句子的理解。而长难句通常是阅读理解中设题的关键之处。因此同学在前期准备阶段,尽量巩固语法知识,对考研涉及到的重要语法点做到耳熟于胸。此外,我们可以找来英汉互译的权威读物,扣上英文,按照中文的意思去译为英文,然后比较、分析。也可以抽出真题中的阅读理解或其他题型中的英文训练翻译成中文。然后,对照真题详析类的资料进行修改。不过,无论何种方式,对于当时错误中显现出的知识点,一定要事后彻底弄懂。

阅读

此外,大家要明白一点,背单词,学语法最主要的目的是为了看的懂文章,做的对题目。因此,大家可以同步得看一些题源文章,这里给大家推荐比如《发现》、《时代周刊》、《探索》、《经济学家》、《新闻周刊》等专业型极高的刊评。如果能够坚持看这些期刊,对于考研英语阅读水平确有非常大的帮助。

至于其它专项,明年六月份之后,大家可以通过系统地作真题,掌握相关做题方法来搞定。成功一定会降临给那些有准备的人,希望备考考研的小伙伴们从现在开始马上有行动。

篇4:考研英语备考阅读理解练习题

IF YOU'RE CONFUSED BY ALL the news about the health effects of eating fish, you're not alone. On one hand, the omega-3 fatty acids in fish are known to reduce the risk of heart disease, as the American Heart Association reminded us two weeks ago when it restated its recommendation that everybody eat at least two fish servings a week. On the other hand, fish that feed in contaminated waterways contain high levels of mercury, which can lead to cognitive problems in developing brains. That's why pregnant women and nursing mothers are advised to limit their consumption.

As if that weren't confusing enough, two new studies published last week in the New England Journal of Medicine investigated the possible effects of mercury on the heart, and they seem to have reached contradictory conclusions. One found no clear link between mercury levels and heart disease; the other found that men with high levels of mercury in their toenails were more likely to suffer a heart attack than those with low levels. What are we to make of this? The first thing to remember is that this is how science proceeds, by fits and starts and seemingly contradictory results that get resolved only by further study. The second is that not all fish are created equal.

Compared with all the other things you might eat, fish are an excellent source of protein. They tend to eat algae as part of their natural life cycle, converting it into omega-3 fatty acids that can improve your cholesterol profile. But it's also true that our waterways have become increasingly contaminated with all sorts of pollutants, including mercury, and that these pollutants tend to accumulate at different levels in different species. The fish most at risk are predators high in the pelagic food chain, such as swordfish and sharks (see chart)。

It was to test the effects of mercury on the heart that the two new studies compared the mercury levels in clippings from toenails, where heavy metals tend to be deposited. In one study, researchers led by Dr. Eliseo Guallar at Johns Hopkins found that European and Israeli men with the highest mercury levels were nearly 2.2 times as likely to have a heart attack as those with the lowest levels. The other study, led by Dr. Walter Willett at the Harvard School of Public Health, looked at a selection of American men and found no connection between mercury exposure and risk of heart disease, although Willett told me a “weak association” cannot be ruled out.

For most of us, eating two servings of fish a week should not pose any problems. Guallar, who hails from coastal Spain, continues to flavor his paella with salmon, which has negligible mercury levels. Willett eats swordfish only about twice a month――because of its expense, not any fear of mercury. Fish-oil supplements are high in omega3 fatty acids and probably don't contain as much mercury as whole fish. But they don't taste nearly as good.

1. In the opening paragraph, the author introduces his topic by

[A]making a comparison

[B]justifying an assumption

[C]posing a contrast

[D]explaining a phenomenon

2. The phrase “by fits and starts”(Line 6, Paragraph 2) most probably means _______.

[A]something happens smoothly

[B]something keeps starting and then stopping again

[C]something deserves a lot of effort

[D]something is troublesome

3. Clippings from toenails were chosen for the research most probably because _______.

[A]they are more likely to contain mercury

[B]they influence a person‘s heart

[C]they can be easily obtained

[D]they are connected with the heart

4. The views of Dr. Eliseo Guallar and Dr. Walter Willett are ______.

[A]identical

[B]similar

[C]opposite

[D]complementary

5. What can we infer from the last paragraph?

[A]Fish is no threat to Man.

[B]Do not be frightened by some fish.

[C]Eat Fish-oil supplements instead of fish.

[D]Taste is more important than the safety of the food.

答案:CBACB

1.考研英语阅读理解备考练习题

2.考研英语阅读理解练习题

3.考研英语阅读理解练习题

4.考研英语阅读理解练习题及答案

5.考研英语阅读理解B型题练习题及答案

6.考研英语阅读理解冲刺练习题及答案

7.2018考研英语阅读理解备考试题

8.考研英语阅读理解巩固练习题

9.考研英语阅读理解B型题练习题

10.考研英语阅读理解模拟练习题及答案

篇5:2018考研英语阅读理解备考试题

备考试题一:

I had two routine checkups last week, and both the eye doctor and the dentist asked me to my health history for their records. Their requests made sense. Health-care providers should know what problems their patients have had and what medications they're taking to be on the lookout for potential trouble or complications.

On each history, however, the section labeled FAMILY HEALTH HISTORY gave me pause. Few diseases are purely genetic, but plenty have genetic components. If my father suffered from elevated LDL, or bad cholesterol, my doctor should know that, because I'm probably at higher risk. If my mother had breast cancer, my sister (if I had one) would want her physician to be especially vigilant.

While I know something about the history of my parents' health-my father had prostate cancer at a relatively young age and suffered from macular degeneration and Parkinson's disease, and my mother died of lung cancer-there's plenty I don't know. What were my parents' cholesterol numbers and blood pressures? I assume I would have known if either suffered from diabetes, but I can't swear to that. And when it comes to my grandparents, whose genes I also have, I'm even more in the dark.

That makes me fairly typical. According to Dr. Richard Carmona, the U.S. Surgeon General, only about a third of Americans have even tried to put together a family-health history. That's why he has launched the Family History Initiative and declared Thanksgiving National Family History Day. Sitting around the turkey talking about cancer and heart disease may seem like a grim thing to do when you're supposed to be giving thanks for everything that's going right. But since many families will be gathering for the holiday anyway, it's a perfect time to create a medical family tree.

And the Surgeon General is making it easy: if you go to hhs.gov/familyhistory, you can use the Frequently Asked Questions link to find out which diseases tend to run in families, which ones you should be most and least worried about, and what to do if, like me, your parents and grandparents have passed away. You can also download a free piece of software called My Family Health Portrait, which helps you organize the information. The program prints that out in a easy-to-read form you can give to your doctors.

The website insists the software is “fun”, but that may be going a bit far. In any case, it's available only for Windows machines, so Mac users and people without computers have to use a printed version of the tree. It's worth it, though, since it could help save your life or the life of your children someday.

注(1):本文选自Time; 11/22/, p100;

注(2):本文习题命题模仿对象为真题Text 1;

1. In the opening paragraph, the author introduces his topic by

[A] posing a contrast.

[B] justifying an assumption.

[C] explaining a phenomenon.

[D] making a comparison.

2. The statement “I assume I would have known if either suffered from diabetes, but I can't swear to that.” (Line 4, Paragraph 3) implies that

[A] only one of them suffered from diabetes.

[B] neither of them suffered from diabetes.

[C] both of them suffered from diabetes.

[D] it's uncertain whether they suffered from diabetes or not.

3. Family health report is very important because

[A] you can be careful about some disease and keep fit.

[B] you are connected with your parents and your grandparents.

[C] many diseases are genetic and should be noticed.

[D] you should be considerate and care about your parents.

4. Dr. Richard Carmona suggests that

[A] you should present your doctor with a medical history.

[B] you should print out your family's medical history.

[C] you should gather your family's medical history.

[D] you should give thanks for everything that is going right.

5. What can we infer from the last paragraph?

[A] The software is fun enough.

[B] Family medical tree shouldn't be neglected.

[C] The software is not available anywhere.

[D] It is worthwhile to draw a family tree.

答案:C B A C B

备考试题二:

Depending on whom you ask, the experiment announced at a Texas medical conference last week was a potential breakthrough for infertile women, a tragic failure or a dangerous step closer to the nightmare scenario of human cloning.

There's truth to all these points of view. Infertility was clearly the motivation when Chinese doctors used a new technique to help one of their countrywomen get pregnant. Unlike some infertile women, the 30-year-old patient produced eggs just fine, and those eggs could be fertilized by sperm. But they never developed properly, largely because of defects in parts of the egg outside the fertilized nucleus. So using a technique developed by Dr. James Grifo at New York University, Dr. Zhuang Guanglun of Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou took the patient's fertilized egg, scooped out the chromosome-bearing nuclear material and put it in a donated egg whose nucleus had been removed. In this more benign environment, development proceeded normally, and the woman became pregnant with triplets who carried a mix of her DNA and her husband's――pretty much like any normal baby.

What has some doctors and ethicists upset is that this so-called nuclear-transfer technique has also been used to produce clones, starting with Dolly the sheep. The only significant difference is that with cloning, the ed nucleus comes from a single, usually adult, cell, and the resulting offspring is genetically identical to the parent. Doing that with humans is ethically repugnant to many. Besides, for reasons that aren't yet well understood, cloned animals often abort spontaneously or are born with defects; Dolly died very young, though she had seemed healthy. And because the Chinese woman's twins were born prematurely and died (the third triplet was removed early on to improve chances for the remaining two), critics have suggested that cloning and nuclear transfer are equally risky for humans.

Not likely, says Grifo. “The obstetric outcome was a disaster,” he admits, “but the embryos were chromosomally normal. We have no evidence that it had anything to do with the procedure.” Even so, concern over potential risks is why the Food and Drug Administration created a stringent approval process for such research in ――a process that Grifo found so onerous that he stopped working on the technique and gave it to the researchers in China, where it was subsequently banned (but only this month, long after Zhuang's patient became pregnant)。

The bottom line, say critics, is that perfecting a technique that could be used for human cloning, even if it were developed for another purpose, is just a bad idea――an assertion Zhuang rejects. “I agree that it makes sense to control these experiments,” he says. “But we've developed an effective technology to help people. We understand how to do it. We need it.”

注(1):本文选自Time; 10/27/, p47;

注(2):本文习题命题模仿对象真题Text 4;

1. What is implied in the first paragraph?

[A]Some people regard it as a tragic failure.

[B]The new experiment means a breakthrough for some people.

[C]People have different reactions to the new experiment.

[D]The new experiment means a step further to the dangerous human cloning.

2. The author uses the case of Dolly and the Chinese pregnant woman to show that _________.

[A]both nuclear-transfer and cloning are dangerous for humans and animals

[B]both of them benefit from the new technique

[C]both of them are the examples of technical failure

[D]both of them are the fruits of the new technology

3. Zhuang‘s attitude toward the critics’ conclusion is one of __________.

[A]reserved consent

[B]strong disapproval

[C]slight contempt

[D]enthusiastic support

4. The only difference existing between nuclear-transfer and cloning technique is ________.

[A]whether it is used for research or for helping the infertile

[B]whether the offspring looks like the parent

[C]whether it is used in animals or human beings

[D]whether the ed nucleus comes from a single and usually adult cell

5. The text intends to express the idea that _________.

[A]research of cloning has potential risks

[B]the research of cloning should be stopped totally

[C]ethics and research of cloning are in contradiction

[D]researchers should have the right to continue the study of cloning

答案:CABDC

备考试题三:

A widely heralded but still experimental cancer-fighting compound may be used someday to prevent two other major killers of Americans: heart disease and stroke. That was the implication of a remarkable report published last week in the journal Circulation by a team of researchers from Dr. Judah Folkman's laboratory at the Children's Hospital in Boston.

The versatile compound is endostatin, a human protein that inhibits angiogenesis, the growth of new blood vessels in the body. In tests reported in by Folkman, a prominent cancer researcher who pioneered the study of angiogenesis, the drug had reduced and even eradicated tumors in laboratory mice. How? By stunting the growth of capillaries necessary for nourishing the burgeoning mouse tumors.

When news of Folkman's achievement became widely known last year, it led to wildly exaggerated predictions of imminent cancer cures. When other scientists were initially unable to duplicate those results, questions arose about the validity of Folkman's research. Then in February scientists at the National Cancer Institute, with guidance from Folkman, finally matched his results. Reassured, the N.C.I. gave the go-ahead for clinical trials of endostatin later this year on patients with advanced tumors.

How can a drug that is apparently effective against tumors also reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke? The answer lies in the composition of plaque, the fatty deposit that builds up in arteries and can eventually clog them. Plaque consists of a mix of cholesterol, white blood cells and smooth muscle cells, and as it accumulates, a network of capillaries sprouts from the artery walls to nourish the cells. Could endostatin halt the growth of capillaries and starve the plaque?

A Folkman lab team led by Dr. Karen Moulton decided to find out. The scientists put baby lab mice on a 16-week “Western diet” that was high in fat and cholesterol, then measured the plaque buildup on the walls of each aorta, the large artery that carries blood from the heart to the rest of the body. Meanwhile, they injected one group of mice with endostatin, another with a different blood-vessel inhibitor called TNP-470 and a control group with an inert saline solution. Twenty weeks later the researchers again measured plaque in the mouse aortas. The results were startling: the endostatin group averaged 85% less plaque buildup and the TNP-470 group 70% less than those in the control group.

All too aware of the premature hopes raised last year after Folkman's tumor report, the researchers have been careful not to oversell the new results. “If this finding is supported in future studies,” says Moulton, “[it could open the way for] treatments that could delay the progression of heart disease and possibly reduce the incidence of heart attacks and strokes.” But any such treatments, she stresses, are probably five to 10 years away.

注(1):本文选自Time; 04/19/99, p48;

注(2):本文习题命题模仿对象真题Text 1;

1. What did the report indicate?

[A]A very important drug is now at experimental stage.

[B]Heart disease and stroke are the most serious threats to Americans.

[C]The tumor drug can be used for the heart disease in the future.

[D]Many Americans suffer from heart disease and stroke.

2. Why did the N.C.I. agree to have clinical trials of endostatin on the patients?

[A]They were convinced of the Folkman's research.

[B]They can do such a research as well as Folkman.

[C]The patients with advanced tumors need the drug.

[D]The drug should be proved effective on humans.

3. The expression “stunting the growth of capillaries”(Line 8, Paragraph 2) most probably

means _______.

[A]help the growth of capillaries

[B]limit the growth of capillaries

[C]improve the growth of capillaries

[D]prevent the growth of capillaries

4. Why can the tumor drug be used for the heart?

[A]It can accumulate a network of capillaries and nourish the cells.

[B]It can stop the growth of capillaries and provide no nourishment for plaque.

[C]The curing method of tumor and heart disease is the same.

[D]The tumor and heart disease are made up of the same substance.

5. Which of the following is true according to the text?

[A]Folkman's tumor report had been exaggerated.

[B]The tumor drug is not as effective as what has been expected.

[C]The new results of the research are far more encouraging.

[D]Researchers still have a long way to go to make another successful experiment.

答案:CADBC

备考试题四:

IF YOU'RE CONFUSED BY ALL the news about the health effects of eating fish, you're not alone. On one hand, the omega-3 fatty acids in fish are known to reduce the risk of heart disease, as the American Heart Association reminded us two weeks ago when it restated its recommendation that everybody eat at least two fish servings a week. On the other hand, fish that feed in contaminated waterways contain high levels of mercury, which can lead to cognitive problems in developing brains. That's why pregnant women and nursing mothers are advised to limit their consumption.

As if that weren't confusing enough, two new studies published last week in the New England Journal of Medicine investigated the possible effects of mercury on the heart, and they seem to have reached contradictory conclusions. One found no clear link between mercury levels and heart disease; the other found that men with high levels of mercury in their toenails were more likely to suffer a heart attack than those with low levels. What are we to make of this? The first thing to remember is that this is how science proceeds, by fits and starts and seemingly contradictory results that get resolved only by further study. The second is that not all fish are created equal.

Compared with all the other things you might eat, fish are an excellent source of protein. They tend to eat algae as part of their natural life cycle, converting it into omega-3 fatty acids that can improve your cholesterol profile. But it's also true that our waterways have become increasingly contaminated with all sorts of pollutants, including mercury, and that these pollutants tend to accumulate at different levels in different species. The fish most at risk are predators high in the pelagic food chain, such as swordfish and sharks (see chart)。

It was to test the effects of mercury on the heart that the two new studies compared the mercury levels in clippings from toenails, where heavy metals tend to be deposited. In one study, researchers led by Dr. Eliseo Guallar at Johns Hopkins found that European and Israeli men with the highest mercury levels were nearly 2.2 times as likely to have a heart attack as those with the lowest levels. The other study, led by Dr. Walter Willett at the Harvard School of Public Health, looked at a selection of American men and found no connection between mercury exposure and risk of heart disease, although Willett told me a “weak association” cannot be ruled out.

For most of us, eating two servings of fish a week should not pose any problems. Guallar, who hails from coastal Spain, continues to flavor his paella with salmon, which has negligible mercury levels. Willett eats swordfish only about twice a month――because of its expense, not any fear of mercury. Fish-oil supplements are high in omega3 fatty acids and probably don't contain as much mercury as whole fish. But they don't taste nearly as good.

注(1):本文选自Time; 12/9/, p99;

注(2):本文习题命题模仿对象真题Text 1;

1. In the opening paragraph, the author introduces his topic by

[A]making a comparison

[B]justifying an assumption

[C]posing a contrast

[D]explaining a phenomenon

2. The phrase “by fits and starts”(Line 6, Paragraph 2) most probably means _______.

[A]something happens smoothly

[B]something keeps starting and then stopping again

[C]something deserves a lot of effort

[D]something is troublesome

3. Clippings from toenails were chosen for the research most probably because _______.

[A]they are more likely to contain mercury

[B]they influence a person‘s heart

[C]they can be easily obtained

[D]they are connected with the heart

4. The views of Dr. Eliseo Guallar and Dr. Walter Willett are ______.

[A]identical

[B]similar

[C]opposite

[D]complementary

5. What can we infer from the last paragraph?

[A]Fish is no threat to Man.

[B]Do not be frightened by some fish.

[C]Eat Fish-oil supplements instead of fish.

[D]Taste is more important than the safety of the food.

答案:CBACB

1.2018考研英语完型填空备考试题

2.2018考研英语阅读理解复习技巧

3.考研英语基础备考指南

4.2018考研英语复习计划及备考建议

5.2018考研英语完型填空备考题

6.考研英语阅读理解练习试题

7.考研英语阅读理解测试题

8.考研英语阅读理解试题

9.考研英语试题(阅读理解)

10.2018考研英语复习

篇6:考研英语阅读及翻译备考指导

考研英语阅读及翻译备考指导

有的放矢 突破阅读

阅读是考研英语的重头戏,从很大程度上说,考研成败在此一举。阅读的分值比重大,复习时可以阅读为重点,带动完形填空和英译汉,同时兼顾写作和听力。

阅读没有什么诀窍,但有一定的技巧,靠的是平时的训练,持之以恒,熟能生巧,形成良好的语感。特别是阅读新题型:完形填空和阅读理解的结合,7选1,如果没有一定的阅读实力,无论什么方法技巧都不管用。阅读不像背生词那样可以很快见效,不是几个星期就能突击起来的。考生平时可通过阅读英语原文报纸期刊、六级以上或研究生英语精泛读教材来提高阅读能力。

对于考生阅读中出现的主要问题,归纳起来有三点:一是读不懂,二是速度慢,三是准确率低。考生应针对自己的具体情况作相应的复习准备。

如果自己属于第一种情况,读不懂,这主要是语法词汇问题造成了阅读障碍,可在解决了词汇量的基础上,集中精力做句法分析,将历年考研阅读、翻译重新做一遍。先解决长难句的理解问题,理清句式结构,译出原文的每一个字句,然后再考虑速度。这种做法刚开始可能速度很慢,不过一旦上了路,情况就会大为改观。

如果属于第二种情况,速度慢,这主要是词汇和阅读习惯问题,需要掌握一定的阅读技巧。可采取精、快读分头训练、相互结合的方式。譬如说,在某一特定复习期间进行精读训练,重点放在把握句子语法结构、准确理解词语意思上,然后转入快读训练,重点放在捕捉信息,把握要点上,限时完成,逐步加快速度。精读要尽量细,力争读懂每一个词,快读要尽量准,努力把握文章的要点、信息。最后将二者结合起来,在精和快之间取一个中数,也就是考试所需有把握的阅读速度。

对于第三种情况,准确率低,问题的关键是考生把握信息的能力不强,弄不清文章中哪些是主要信息,哪些是次要信息,哪些是冗余信息。建议这类考生根据每次错误的情况认真总结经验教训。最好的办法就是将最近5年的考研真题仔细阅读,认真分析。因为这些阅读试题的命题是经过多位专家反复推敲形成的,无论是文章内容还是问题的设置都具有很好的指导意义。

有些考生常常抱怨说,有时候全看懂的文章出错多,一些看不太懂的文章反而错误比较少,这是为什么呢?这里面有两方面的因素。一是主观原因,所谓能看懂,看懂到什么程度?懂其大意、细节还是深刻的内在含义?打一个比方,高考语文的阅读,几乎没有哪个考生会抱怨说看不懂,而能在阅读上不扣分的却寥寥无几。其次是客观原因,题目的干扰性大,文章内容易懂,题出得难,弦外之音不容易辨析。考生不清楚出题者的意图,把握不好题意,一不小心就掉进了干扰陷阱。对这种情况不妨送大家四句话去慢慢琢磨体会:动脑筋,多分析,抓主线,排干扰。

透彻理解 通顺翻译

翻译的关键是准确理解,通顺表达。历览近10年的研究生入学翻译试题,我们不难发现,考题往往有这样几大特点:首先,划线句子的'结构都比较复杂,指代关系不能一眼就看出来,需要考生根据上下文去寻找替换词语;其次,需要翻译的句子里往往带有一些成语、习惯表达句型,不能采用字对字的直译方法来处理;第三,由于英汉表达习惯上的差异,对有些词语需要根据汉语表达的需要进行增减、调整、转换或引申处理。

应当怎样准备翻译考试呢?我们认为,平时要结合阅读理解训练来加强语感,把握好句式结构与重心,着重解决长句、难句的翻译。做到读不懂不罢休,读懂了,再动手译。考试时,要冷静细心,不要拿着题就急匆匆拼命往前赶。可先用2-3分钟时间通读全文,理出每一划线句的主谓结构,搞清句与句之间的主次关系,各个意群之间的修饰关系,然后在靠近英语原文的位置用铅笔简要地译出主、谓、宾等关键词语,即先从整体上领会原文的意思,把握好句式结构,然后再动笔翻译一气呵成,将构思好的译文写到答题卡上。只要理解透彻,表达清楚,考分自然低不了。

如果翻译题中有不认识的生词怎么办?最好不要直接将原词硬抄上去,更不要放弃全句的翻译,可以根据上下文推断出该词的大概意思。

中国大学网

考研计算机专业:基础阶段备考常见问题

备考BEC中级需要哪些资料

GRE写作高分经验

商务英语经验BEC考后总结

一份详细有效的寒假英语学习计划

高考百日誓师演讲稿

110+托福大神备考经验

口语训练:你有什么好的建议吗?

研究生招生考试之政治全程规划

给孤军奋战的研友 武汉理工环境艺术设计考研经历

考研英语备考 英语阅读多长时间合适?
《考研英语备考 英语阅读多长时间合适?.doc》
将本文的Word文档下载到电脑,方便收藏和打印
推荐度:
点击下载文档

【考研英语备考 英语阅读多长时间合适?(锦集6篇)】相关文章:

考研英语作文备考句2022-05-14

如何通过“三心二意”学英语2023-11-14

高考备考最后阶段注意事项2022-05-06

雅思口语考试避免陷阱2023-07-13

高考语文备考2023-03-11

国庆七天英语考研复习法指南2023-07-06

英语口语范文中文翻译2023-09-19

华东师大学生阅读情况报告2023-05-09

托业听力与阅读考试机考小贴士2022-09-04

关于成都小学生期末考试如何提高20分2022-09-12

点击下载本文文档