考研英语阅读理解冲刺练习题（共5篇）由网友“阿阿阿明”投稿提供，下面是小编为大家整理后的考研英语阅读理解冲刺练习题，仅供大家参考借鉴，希望大家喜欢!
篇1：考研英语阅读理解冲刺练习题
I had two routine checkups last week， and both the eye doctor and the dentist asked me to my health history for their records. Their requests made sense. Health-care providers should know what problems their patients have had and what medications they're taking to be on the lookout for potential trouble or complications.
On each history， however， the section labeled FAMILY HEALTH HISTORY gave me pause. Few diseases are purely genetic， but plenty have genetic components. If my father suffered from elevated LDL， or bad cholesterol， my doctor should know that， because I'm probably at higher risk. If my mother had breast cancer， my sister (if I had one) would want her physician to be especially vigilant.
While I know something about the history of my parents' health-my father had prostate cancer at a relatively young age and suffered from macular degeneration and Parkinson's disease， and my mother died of lung cancer-there's plenty I don't know. What were my parents' cholesterol numbers and blood pressures? I assume I would have known if either suffered from diabetes， but I can't swear to that. And when it comes to my grandparents， whose genes I also have， I'm even more in the dark.
That makes me fairly typical. According to Dr. Richard Carmona， the U.S. Surgeon General， only about a third of Americans have even tried to put together a family-health history. That's why he has launched the Family History Initiative and declared Thanksgiving National Family History Day. Sitting around the turkey talking about cancer and heart disease may seem like a grim thing to do when you're supposed to be giving thanks for everything that's going right. But since many families will be gathering for the holiday anyway， it's a perfect time to create a medical family tree.
And the Surgeon General is making it easy： if you go to hhs.gov/familyhistory， you can use the Frequently Asked Questions link to find out which diseases tend to run in families， which ones you should be most and least worried about， and what to do if， like me， your parents and grandparents have passed away. You can also download a free piece of software called My Family Health Portrait， which helps you organize the information. The program prints that out in a easy-to-read form you can give to your doctors.
The website insists the software is “fun”， but that may be going a bit far. In any case， it's available only for Windows machines， so Mac users and people without computers have to use a printed version of the tree. It's worth it， though， since it could help save your life or the life of your children someday.
1. In the opening paragraph， the author introduces his topic by
[A] posing a contrast.
[B] justifying an assumption.
[C] explaining a phenomenon.
[D] making a comparison.
2. The statement “I assume I would have known if either suffered from diabetes， but I can't swear to that.” (Line 4， Paragraph 3) implies that
[A] only one of them suffered from diabetes.
[B] neither of them suffered from diabetes.
[C] both of them suffered from diabetes.
[D] it's uncertain whether they suffered from diabetes or not.
3. Family health report is very important because
[A] you can be careful about some disease and keep fit.
[B] you are connected with your parents and your grandparents.
[C] many diseases are genetic and should be noticed.
[D] you should be considerate and care about your parents.
4. Dr. Richard Carmona suggests that
[A] you should present your doctor with a medical history.
[B] you should print out your family's medical history.
[C] you should gather your family's medical history.
[D] you should give thanks for everything that is going right.
5. What can we infer from the last paragraph?
[A] The software is fun enough.
[B] Family medical tree shouldn't be neglected.
[C] The software is not available anywhere.
[D] It is worthwhile to draw a family tree.
答案：C B A C B
1.考研英语阅读理解冲刺练习题及答案
2.考研英语阅读理解练习题
3.考研英语阅读理解练习题及答案
4.考研英语阅读理解练习题
5.考研英语完型填空冲刺练习题
6.考研英语完型填空冲刺练习题及答案
7.考研英语阅读理解考前冲刺练习题及答案
8.考研英语阅读理解精读练习题
9.考研英语阅读理解巩固练习题
10.考研英语阅读理解备考练习题
篇2：考研英语阅读理解冲刺练习题及答案
Dr. Wise Young has never met the hundreds of thousands of people he has helped in the past 10 years， and most of them have never heard of Wise Young. If they did meet him， however， they'd want to shake his hand――and the remarkable thing about that would be the simple fact that so many of them could. All the people Young has helped were victims of spinal injuries， and they owe much of the mobility they have today to his landmark work.
Young， 51， head of the W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience at Rutgers University in New Brunswick， N.J.， was born on New Year's Day at the precise midpoint of the 20th century. Back then， the thinking about spinal-cord injury was straightforward： When a cord is damaged， it's damaged. There's nothing that can be done after an injury to restore the function that was so suddenly lost. As a medical student at Stanford University and a neurosurgeon at New York University Medical Center， Young never had much reason to question that received wisdom， but in 1980 he began to have his doubts. Spinal cords， he knew， experience progressive damage after they're injured， including swelling and inflammation， which may worsen the condition of the already damaged tissue. If that secondary insult could be relieved with drugs， might some function be preserved?
Young spent a decade looking into the question， and in 1990 he co-led a landmark study showing that when high doses of a steroid known as methylprednisolone are administered within eight hours of an injury， about 20% of function can be saved. Twenty percent is hardly everything， but it can often be the difference between breathing unassisted or relying on a respirator， walking or spending one's life in a wheelchair. “This discovery led to a revolution in neuroprotective therapy，” Young says.
A global revolution， actually. More than 50，000 people around the world suffer spinal injuries each year， and these days， methylprednisolone is the standard treatment in the U.S. and many other countries. But Young is still not satisfied. The drug is an elixir for people who are newly injured， but the relief it offers is only partial， and many spinal-injury victims were hurt before it became available. Young's dream is to help those people too――to restore function already lost――and to that end he is studying drugs and growth factors that could improve conduction in damaged nerves or even prod the development of new ones. To ensure that all the neural researchers around the world pull together， he has created the International Neurotrauma Society， founded the Journal of Neural Trauma and established a website (carecure.rutgers.edu) that receives thousands of hits each day.
“The cure for spinal injury is going to be a combination of therapies，” Young says. “It's the most collaborative field I know.” Perhaps. But increasingly it seems that if the collaborators had a field general， his name would be Wise Young.
1. By “the remarkable thing about that would be the simple fact that so many of them could”(Line three， Paragraph 1)， the author means_______________.
[A] The remarkable thing is actually the simple fact.
[B] Many people could do the remarkable things.
[C] When meeting him， many people could do the simple but remarkable thing.
[D] The remarkable thing lies in the simple fact that so many people could shake hands with him.
2. How did people think of the spinal-cord injury at the middle of 20th century?
[A] pessimistic
[B] optimistic
[C] confused
[D] carefree
3. By saying “Twenty percent is hardly everything”(Line 3， Paragraph 3)， the author is talking about_____________.
[A] the drug
[B] the function of the injured body
[C] the function of the drug
[D] the injury
4. Why was Young unsatisfied with his achievement?
[A] The drug cannot help the people who had spinal injury in the past.
[B] His treatment is standard.
[C] The drug only offers help to a small number of people.
[D] The drug only treats some parts of the injury.
5. To which of the following statements is the author likely to agree?
[A] Wise Young does not meet many people.
[B] When Young was young， he did not have much reason to ask questions.
[C] If there needs a head of the spinal-injured field， Young might be the right person.
[D] Young‘s dream is only to help the persons who were injured at early times.
答案：D A B A C
1.考研英语阅读理解练习题及答案
2.考研英语完型填空冲刺练习题及答案
3.考研英语阅读理解考前冲刺练习题及答案
4.考研英语阅读理解考前练习题及答案
5.考研英语完型填空冲刺练习题【含答案】
6.考研英语完型填空冲刺练习题及答案解析
7.考研英语阅读理解练习题
8.2018考研英语阅读理解练习题
9.考研英语完型填空冲刺练习题
10.2017考研英语阅读理解真题及答案
篇3：考研英语阅读理解练习题
Being a man hasalways been dangerous. There are about 105 males born for every 100 females,but this ratio drops to near balance at the age of maturity, and among70-year-olds there are twice as many women as men. But the great universal ofmale mortality is being changed. Now, boy babies survive almost as well as girlsdo. This means that, for the first time, there will be an excess of boys inthose crucial years when they are searching for a mate. More important, anotherchance for natural selection has been removed. Fifty years ago, the chance of ababy(particularly a boy baby) surviving depended on its weight. A kilogram toolight or too heavy meant almost certain death. Today it makes almost nodifference. Since much of the variation is due to genes, one more agent ofevolution has gone。
There is another way to commit evolutionary : stay alive,but have fewer children. Few people are as fertile as in the past. Except insome religious communities, very few women have 15 children. Nowadays thenumber of births, like the age of death, has become average. Most of us haveroughly the same number of offspring. Again, differences between people and theopportunity for natural selection to take advantage of it have diminished.India shows what is happening. The country offers wealth for a few in the greatcities and poverty for the remaining tribal peoples. The grand mediocrity oftodayDeveryone being the same in survival and number of offspring meansthat natural selection has lost 80% of its power in upper-middle-class Indiacompared to the tribes。
For us, this means that evolution is over; the biological Utopiahas arrived. Strangely, it has involved little physical change. No otherspecies fills so many places in nature. But in the past 100,000 years―even thepast 100 years―our lives have been transformed but our bodies have not. We did notevolve, because machines and society did it for us. Darwin had a phrase todescribe those ignorant of evolution: “they look at anorganic being as average looks at a ship, as at something wholly beyond hiscomprehension。” No doubt we will remember a 20th century way of life beyondcomprehension for its ugliness. But however amazed our descendants may be athow far from Utopia we were, they will look just like us。
1. What used to be the danger in being a man according to thefirst paragraph?
[A]A lack of mates。
[B]A fierce competition。
[C]A lower survival rate。
[D]A defective gene。
2. What does the example of India illustrate?
[A]Wealthy people tend to have fewer children than poor people。
[B]Natural selection hardly works among the rich and the poor。
[C]The middle class population is 80% smaller than that of thetribes。
[D]India is one of the countries with a very high birth rate。
3. The author argues that our bodies have stopped evolving because____。
[A]life has been improved by technological advance
[B]the number of female babies has been declining
[C]our species has reached the highest stage of evolution
[D]the difference between wealth and poverty is disappearing
4 Which of the following would be the best title for the passage?
[A]Sex Ration Changes in Human Evolution
[B]Ways of Continuing Man's Evolution
[C]The Evolutionary Future of Nature
名师解析
1. What used to be the danger in being a man according to the firstparagraph?
根据第一段，做男人以前有什么危险?
[A]A lack of mates. 缺少配偶。
[B]A fierce competition. 激烈竞争。
[C]A lower survival rate. 低存活率。
[D]A defective gene. 有缺陷的基因。
【答案】 C
【考点】 事实细节题。
【分析】 文中第一段提到“做男人从来都充满危险，新生儿男女比例大约是105:100，但到了成年，这一比例基本持平，而在70岁的老人中女性是男性的两倍，但是男性死亡率高这种普遍情况正在改变，现在男婴存活率同女婴的基本一样高”这说明男人的存活率相对是比较低的。
2. What does the example of India illustrate?
印度的例子证明了什么?
[A] Wealthy people tend to have fewer children than poor people。
富人往往孩子比穷人少。
[B] Natural selection hardly works among the rich and the poor。
自然选择在穷人和富人之间几乎不起作用。
[C] The middle class population is 80% smaller than that of thetribes。
中产阶级的人口比部落人口少80%。
[D] India is one of the countries with a very high birth rate。
印度是出生率很高的国家之一。
【答案】 B
【考点】 推断题。
【分析】 使用事例来证明是常见的逻辑思维模式。既然有事例，我们就需要看到它的论点是什么。本文中提到，“进化意义上的自杀还有一种方法：存活，但少生孩子”。首先“现在几乎没有人像过去那样多育。除了在一些宗教社区，几乎没有几名妇女会生15个孩子”表明了“当今出生的数量同死亡年龄一样变得平均化，我们大多数人的子女数量大致相当”，再一次，人与人之间的差异和利用差异进行自然选择的机会降低了。其次，“印度证明了这种情况。这个国家给大城市里的少数人提供财富，而给其余的各部落居民造成了贫困。今天这种每个人的生存机会和子女数量都相同的极其显著的平均化意味着与部落相比，自然选择在印度社会中、上层人群中，已经失去了80%的效力”是为了证明“人与人之间的差异和利用差异进行自然选择的机会降低了”，换言之，“自然选择在穷人和富人之间几乎不起作用”。答案应该是[B]选项。
3. The author argues that our bodies have stopped evolvingbecause____。
作者认为我们的身体已经停止进化，因为____。
[A] life has been improved by technological advance
技术进步改善了人的生活
[B] the number of female babies has been declining
女婴的数量一直在减少
[C] our species has reached the highest stage of evolution
我们人种已经到达进化最高阶段
[D] the difference between wealth and poverty is disappearing
贫富差距间的区别正在消失
【答案】 A
【考点】 逻辑关系题。
【分析】 文中提到停止进化是在第三段第一句“对我们来说，这意味着进化已经结束”。第三段中指出，“在过去的10万年――甚至过去的1中，我们的生活发生了变化，但我们的身体却没变。我们没有进化。因为机器和社会替我们办了这一切”，“机器”代表的就是“技术”，因此我们可以判定[A]是正确答案。
4. Which of the following would be the best title for the passage?
以下哪一个最合适做本文标题?
[A]Sex Ration Changes in Human Evolution 人类进化中的性别比例变化
[B]Ways of Continuing Man's Evolution 继续人类进化的方式
[C]The Evolutionary Future of Nature 自然进化的未来
[D]Human Evolution Going Nowhere 人类进化无路可走
【答案】 D
【考点】 文章主旨题。
【分析】 文章中在第一段结尾提到“由于大部分差异是由基因引起的，又一个进化的因素消失了。”第二段中说“再一次，人与人之间的差异和利用差异进行自然选择的机会降低了。”第三段提到“但我们的身体却没变。我们没有进化，因为机器和社会替我们办了这一切。”这些都表明作者认为进化机制已不再起作用，认为自然进化机制已不能再左右人口的出生率。在总结全文的第三段时，作者直截了当地指出，进化已经结束。因此可以认为人类的进化是无路可走的。另外三个选项都不全面或者不对题。
[D]Human Evolution Going Nowhere
1.考研英语阅读理解精读练习题
2.考研英语练习题
3.考研英语阅读理解练习题及答案解析
4.考研英语阅读理解如何快速找答案
5.考研英语阅读理解技巧
6.2017考研英语阅读理解练习试题
7.2017考研英语阅读理解真题及答案
8.考研英语阅读理解技巧全解
9.2017考研英语阅读理解技巧讲解
10.考研英语阅读理解测试题
篇4：考研英语阅读理解练习题
Why do so many Americans distrust what they read in theirnewspapers? The American Society of Newspaper Editors is trying to answer thispainful question. The organization is deep into a long self-analysis known asthe journalism credibility project.
Sad to say, this project has turned out to be mostly low-levelfindings about factual errors and spelling and grammar mistakes, combined withlots of head-scratching puzzlement about what in the world those readers reallywant.
But the sources of distrust go way deeper. Most journalists learnto see the world through a set of standard templates (patterns) into which theyplug each day's events. In other words, there is a conventional story line inthe newsroom culture that provides a backbone and a ready-made narrativestructure for otherwise confusing news.
There exists a social and cultural disconnect between journalistsand their readers, which helps explain why the “standard templates”of the newsroom seem alien to many readers. In a recent survey, questionnaireswere sent to reporters in five middle-size cities around the country, plus onelarge metropolitan area. Then residents in these communities were phoned atrandom and asked the same questions.
Replies show that compared with other Americans, journalists aremore likely to live in upscale neighborhoods, have maids, own Mercedeses, andtrade stocks, and they're less likely to go to church, do volunteer work, orput down roots in a community.
Reporters tend to be part of a broadly defined social and culturalelite, so their work tends to reflect the conventional values of this elite.The astonishing distrust of the news media isn't rooted in inaccuracy or poorreportorial skills but in the daily clash of world views between reporters andtheir readers.
This is an explosive situation for any industry, particularly adeclining one. Here is a troubled business that keeps hiring employees whoseattitudes vastly annoy the customers. Then it sponsors lots of symposiums and acredibility project dedicated to wondering why customers are annoyed andfleeing in large numbers. But it never seems to get around to noticing thecultural and class biases that so many former buyers are complaining about. Ifit did, it would open up its diversity program, now focused narrowly on raceand gender, and look for reporters who differ broadly by outlook, values,education, and class.
篇5：考研英语阅读理解练习题
名师解析
29. What is the passage mainly about? 本文主要讲的是什么?
[A]Needs of the readers all over the world. 全世界读者的需要。
[B]Causes of the public disappointment about newspapers. 造成公众对报纸失望的原因。
[C]Origins of the declining newspaper industry. 新闻业衰败的根源。
[D]Aims of a journalism credibility project. 新闻可信度项目的目标。
【答案】 B
【考点】文章主旨题。
【分析】文章的第一句就提出了本文旨在说明的问题“为什么那么多的美国人不相信自己在报纸上读到的内容呢?”从第二段、第三段的内容来看，作者都在试图寻找造成公众对报纸失望的一个真正的根本性的原因。因此可以判断 [B] 为正确答案。 [A] 不正确，是因为它仅仅是新闻界的调查项目得到的一个结果而已。 [C] 和 [A] 相比较，还是 [A] 来得比较确切。 [C] 已经从文章主旨引申到别的项目上去了。 [D]仅仅是为了查明原因而进行的一个调查项目而已。
30. The results of the journalism credibility project turned outto be .
新闻可信度项目的结果是。
[A]quite trustworthy 相当可信
[B]somewhat contradictory 有点矛盾
[C]very illuminating 非常有启发性
[D]rather superficial 相当肤浅
【答案】 D
【考点】事实细节题。
【分析】根据本题题干可以定位到第二段，文中指出“该项目最终所发现的原因大都是新闻报道中的事实错误，拼写或语法错误，以及许多关于读者到底想读些什么令人挠头的困惑”，在作者看来，这些发现大都是“低级的”(low-level) ，而真正的原因没有这么表面“ go waydeeper ” ( 第三段首句中 ) 。因此可以判定是答案是 [D] 选项。
31. The basic problem of journalists as pointed out by the writerlies in their _____.
作者描述的新闻记者的基本问题存在于他们的 _____ 。
[A]working attitude 工作态度
[B]conventional lifestyle 传统的生活方式
[C]world outlook 世界观
[D]educational background 教育背景
【答案】 C
【考点】事实细节题。
【分析】文章的解题点在文章的倒数第二段中“对新闻媒体的这种令人震惊的不信任的根源不在于报道失实或低下的报道技巧，而在于记者与读者的世界观每天都发生着碰撞”这句话。也就是说，作者的基本问题是“世界观”的问题。另外三个选项都不是最基本的问题。
32. Despite its efforts, the newspaper industry still cannotsatisfy the readers owing to its _________.
尽管很努力，新闻行业仍然不能满足读者的需要是因为其 _______ 。
[A]failure to realize its real problem 不能够认识到真正的问题
[B]tendency to hire annoying reporters 倾向于雇佣那些恼人的记者
[C]likeliness to do inaccurate reporting 可能作出不准确的报道
[D]prejudice in matters of race and gender 在种族和性别方面的歧视
【答案】 A
【考点】事实细节题。
【分析】本题的解题点可以确定到最后一段。文中说他们“又举办许多研讨会，搞什么可信度项目，试图了解读者为什么对他们不满意，为什么大量流失。但是，对于那么多原来的顾客所不满的文化和阶级偏见，他们似乎就是没有看见”。由此我们可以看出，真正的原因是他们不能够意识到真正的问题所在，因此正确答案是 [A] 。
难句解析：
1. Sad to say, this project has turned out to be mostly low-levelfindings about factual errors and spelling and grammar mistakes, combined withlots of head-scratching puzzlement about what in the world those readers reallywant.
【结构分析】本句主干是“ thisproject has turned out to be…findings ”，“ mostly low-level”是“findings ”的定语。“ aboutfactual errors and spelling and grammar mistakes ”是介宾短语做定语。“combined with lots of head-scratching puzzlement about what in the world thosereaders really want ”是一个过去分词引导的伴随状语，其中“ aboutwhat in the world those readers really want ”是“puzzlement ”的定语。
2. There exists a social and cultural disconnect betweenjournalists and their readers, which helps explain why the “ standard templates ” of the newsroomseem alien to many readers.
【结构分析】主句是“ there+ 系表结构”。“ which ”引导一个非限定性定语从句，该词指代前面一句话。而在这个定语从句“ whichhelps explain why the ‘ standard templates’ of the newsroom seem alien to manyreaders ”中，又出现一个“ why ”引导的宾语从句。
3. If it did, it would open up its diversity program, now focusednarrowly on race and gender, and look for reporters who differ broadly byoutlook, values, education, and class.
【结构分析】本句的主句中，“ it ”代表上文提到的“ a troubled business ”，即“备受困扰的新闻界”。“ now focused narrowly on race and gender ”是插入语，也是修饰“ program ”的定语。后面有两个并列谓语“ wouldopen up ”和“( would) look for ”。这里需要注意的就是一个意思上的问题，那就是“虽然报业也有多样性项目，招收不同的人当记者，但是这样的多样性仅仅局限于性别和种族，而报业需要多招收那些具有不同的人生观、教育以及来自于不同阶级的人”。
【考研英语阅读理解冲刺练习题（共5篇）】相关文章：
考研数学倒计时计划(11.5-11.11)2023-02-25
考研英语倒计时冲刺计划(12.10-12.16)2022-07-06
考研数学倒计时冲刺计划2022-12-07
考研倒计时40天：英语词汇背诵计划2022-05-22
考研冲刺阶段抓住四大关键有效学习2023-09-14
考研数学 要得高分冲刺复习四步骤2023-03-04
分秒必争?考研冲刺时间管理14法2022-10-08
考研冲刺 勤动笔大于短暂记忆2022-11-24
考研数学 冲刺高分攻略2024-01-10
30天考研冲刺复习之数学各个击破2022-10-06