对海明威的评价英文版(（精选7篇））由网友“花时间陪你”投稿提供，以下是小编为大家汇总后的对海明威的评价英文版，希望对大家有所帮助。
篇1：对海明威的老人与海的评价英文版
the Old Man and the Sea is one of Hemingway's most enduring works and may very well become one of the true classics of this generation. It played a GREat part in his winning the Pulizer Prize in 1953 and the 1954 Novel Prize for Literature and confirmed his power and presence in the literary world. Hemingway is also one of my favorite writers.
Besides The Old Man And the Sea, I have read some of his other works, such as The Sun Also Rises, A Farewell to Arms and The Snow of Kilimanijaro. But The Old Man and the Sea is the one that left the deepest impression on me.I first read this book when I was in my fifteens. And now I remember it just as well as if I had read it yesterday.Pride and Prejudice is a chefdoeuvre.My first impression of this story was from screen.It's long long ago, maybe before I can read english books. I don't remember which movie edition I had seen. But I was impressed by the music, the scenery and the costume. I was very favor of a section of music in its balls. It's pretty brisk, liked a wonderful song of a bird. Regarding to the characters, I liked Elizabeth, the he-ro-in-e,though I didn't think she's beautiful. But she's smart. However, I didn't pay much attention to the plot. I thought it's so long that it made me impatient and bored. By now, I haven't read the whole story in English or its Chinese version, either. I owe it to my prejudice. In fact, I didn't understand the story at that time. I didn't know why it called Pride and Prejudice. Of course someone was pride, but I didn't find where' s the prejudice. I thought it's normal, the way people treated each other in that. I considered prejudice would be very disgusting. But to the movie everthing was OK in my minds, except its length. Now, I think I have understood more about it. I'm a prejudiced person so I can't find where's wrong.
I merely like to do the things I like. Everytime I meet somebody or something,my thinking about he or it all depends on my foregone experience and my mood of the time.
“Vessel crossed the end of the world, into the unknown sea, hanging on the side of the bow while wind and rain erosion-stricken still incomparably beautiful flag, banner, brandishing a Yunlong general words glittering - beyond the limit ”This is the author of Hemingway's evaluation of his work“ The Old Man and the Sea ”. Life itself is an endless pursuit. It's a long road, difficult and full of bumpy, but as long as their indomitable courage and self-confidence to a heart to meet the challenge, he will always be a real winner!
篇2：对海明威的老人与海的评价英文版
This book gives me a deep impression especially the description about the man’s braveness and persistence.
When I was a high school student, I’ve finished this book in Chinese. But when I read it in English, I really gain something new both in the way of expression and the spirit it shows to us. May be different ages to read the same book we will learn different things from it. At least, for my part, that is true.
Firstly, I would like to review some information about this book. Such as the background, major characters and the topic of it.
The Old Man and the Sea is a story by Ernest Hemingway, written in Cuba in 1951 and published in 1952. It was the last major work of fiction to be produced by Hemingway and published in his lifetime. One of his most famous works, it centers upon Santiago, an aging Cuban fisherman who struggles with a giant marlin far out in the Gulf Stream.
The Old Man and the Sea served to reinvigorate Hemingway's literary reputation and prompted a reexamination of his entire body of work. The novella was initially received with much popularity; it restored many readers' confidence in Hemingway's capability as an author. Its publisher, Scribner's, on an early dust jacket, called the novella a “new classic,” and many critics favorably compared it with such works as William Faulkner's “The Bear” and Herman Melville's Moby-Dick.
The old man Santiago from The Old Man and the Sea is a character seen in many perspectives, as a hero, an ordinary fisherman, an unlucky old man, and a wise man. Throughout the novella he is made out as a person of motivation, passion, and hope. Despite what others do or do not think he is a man of action, and not one consumed by regret. The young and old villagers’ view of Santiago is an important one, but not a differentiating one. The villagers are split into two groups. The older fishermen that respect Santiago and wish him luck, and the younger fishermen that see him as little more than bad luck. While neither group is particularly important to the plot, each of their views sets an ambiance of Santiago forthcoming adventure. Without their views Santiago would be little more than a lucky old fisherman. Santiago has a resolute grip upon reality and lives by it. He sees himself as a man with little direction but enough determination and experience to live. He chose not to see what others thought but instead lived by how he perceived the world. His constant struggles and his persistent resolve to overcome the marlin and himself show his earnest desires to live and fish.
The boy is a crucial element to Santiago world. Mandolin is always at the edge of Santiago mind when he thinks of convenience. At times with the fish, Santiago thinks to the boy and then to his own lack of ability. He may deny it,but at times it is his relationship with the boy that both makes him realize he needs help, and compels him to go on.
Christian imagery and concepts are important assets to the old fisherman personality. He is seen as a kind man, and although expresses his frustration towards certain points, only conveys his anger towards the evil representation of the sharks. His kind, infinite eyes, and he carrying his mast like Jesus and his cross only augment his Christ-like personage. His loneliness and greatness are both shown as Mandolin is assigned a new boat after 40 days with Santiago, the same length of time as Christ spent in the wilderness.
Santiago change at the end of the novella turns him into almost a universal hero. By being at sea, his ventures were never limited and the events of the story just seemed to happen. After he rebukes himself for his arrogance with the marlin, Santiago goes home and dreams of the lions playing in Africa, signaling a cycle of a child-like rebirth through Mandolin.
Throughout the story many aspects can be found about Santiago personality merely by the content of his 3-day fight with the marlin. The ideology that encompasses the story is only consumed by Santiago pure will to persevere. Certainly Santiago is a man of many themes and personality traits.
篇3：海明威评价老人与海
海明威评价老人与海
《老人与海 》原文
桑提亚哥是古巴的一个老渔夫，他年轻时非常出色，强健有力，他曾经和一个黑人比赛掰腕子，比了一天一夜，最后终于战胜了对手。到了晚年，他的经历和反应都不如从前，老婆死后，他一个人孤独地住在海边简陋的小茅棚里。
有一段时间，老渔夫独自乘小船打鱼，他接连打了84天，但一条鱼也没有捕到。本来一个叫曼诺林的男孩子总是跟他在一起，可是日子一久曼诺林的父母认为老头悖运，吩咐孩子搭另一条船出海，果然第一个星期就捕到三条好鱼。孩子每次见到老头每天空船而归，心里非常难受，总要帮他拿拿东西。
桑提亚哥瘦削憔悴，后颈满是皱纹，脸上长着疙瘩，但他的双眼象海水一样湛蓝，毫无沮丧之色。他和孩子是忘年交。老头教会孩子捕鱼，因为孩子很爱他。村里很多打鱼的人都因为老头捉不到鱼拿他开玩笑，但是在曼诺林的眼里，老头是最好的渔夫。他们打渔不但是为了挣钱，而是把它看作共同爱好的事业。孩子为老头准备饭菜，跟他一起评论垒球赛。老头特别崇拜垒球好手狄马吉奥。他是渔民的儿子，脚跟上虽长有骨剌，但打起球来生龙活虎。老头认变自己已经年迈，体力不比壮年，但他懂得许多捕鱼的诀窍，而且决心很大，因此他仍是个好渔夫。
老人和孩子相约第二天，也就是第85天一早一起出海。半夜醒后他踏着月光去叫醒孩子，两人分乘两条船，出港后各自驶向自己选择的海面。
天还没有亮，老头已经放下鱼饵。鱼饵的肚子里包着鱼钩的把子，鱼钩的突出部分都裹着新鲜的沙丁鱼。鱼饵香气四溢，味道鲜美。
正当桑提亚哥目不转睛地望着钓丝的时候，他看见露出水面的一根绿色竿子急遽地附入水中。他用右手的大拇指和食指轻轻捏着钓丝。接着钓丝又动了一下，拉力不猛。老头明白，一百英寻之下的海水深处，一条马林鱼正在吃鱼钓上的沙丁鱼。他感觉到下面轻轻的扯动，非常高兴。过了一会儿他觉得有一件硬梆梆、沉甸甸的东西，他断定这是一条大鱼。这激起他要向它挑战的决心。
老人先松开钓丝，然后大喝一声，用尽全身的力气收拢钓丝，但鱼并不肯轻易屈服，非但没有上来一英寸，反而慢慢游开去。老头把钓丝背在脊梁上增加对抗马林鱼的拉力，可是作用不大，他眼睁睁地看着小船向西北方飘去。老头想鱼这样用力过猛很快就会死的，但四个小时后，鱼依然拖着小船向浩渺无边的海面游去，老头也照旧毫不松劲地拉住背在脊梁上的钓丝。他们对抗着。
这时，老人回头望去，陆地已从他的视线中消失。太阳西坠，繁星满天。老人根据对星的观察作出判断：那条大鱼整夜都没有改变方向，夜里天气冷了，老头的汗水干了，他觉得浑身上冷冰冰的。他把一个麻袋垫在肩膀上的钓丝下面减少摩擦，再弯腰靠在船头上，他就感到舒服多了。为了能坚持下去，他不断的和鱼、鸟、大海对话，不断的回忆往事，并想到了曼诺林，他大声地自言自语：“要是孩子在这儿多好啊，好让他帮帮我，再瞧瞧这一切。”
破晓前天很冷，老头抵着木头取暖。他想鱼能支持多久我也能支持多久。他用温柔的语调大声说：“鱼啊，只要我不死就要同你周旋到底。”太阳升起后，老头发觉鱼还没有疲倦，只是钓丝的斜度显示鱼可能要跳起来，这正是他求之不得的事。他说：“鱼啊，我爱你，而且十分尊敬你。可是今天天黑以前我一定要把你弄死。”鱼开始不安分了，它突然把小船扯得晃荡了一下。老头用右手去摸钓丝，发现那只手正在流血。过了一会他的左手又抽起筋来，但他仍竭力坚持。他吃了几片金枪鱼肉好增加点力气来对付那条大鱼。
正在这时钓丝慢慢升起来，大鱼终于露出水里。在阳光下，这浑身明亮夺目，色彩斑斓。它足有18英尺长，比他的船还要大。它的喙长得象一根垒球棒，尖得象一把细长的利剑。它那大镰刀似的尾巴入水中后，钓丝也飞快地滑下去。
老人和大鱼一直相持到日落，双方已搏斗了两天一夜，老头不禁回想起年轻时在卡萨兰卡跟一个黑人比赛扳手的经历。他俩把胳膊肘放在桌上划粉笔线的地方，前臂直，两手握紧，就这样相持了一天一夜。八小时后每隔四个钟头就换一个裁判，让他们轮流睡觉。他和黑人的手指甲里都流出血来。赌注给黑人的.渔民喝了朗姆酒使出全身力气，竟把他的手压下去将近三英寸，但桑提亚哥又把手扳回原来的位置，并且在第二天天亮时奋力把黑人的手扳倒，从此他成了人们心目中的“冠军”。
老人和大鱼的持久战又从黑夜延续到天明。大鱼跃起十二次后开始绕着小船打转。老人头昏眼花，只见眼前黑点在晃动，但他仍紧紧拉着钓丝。当鱼游到他身边时，他放下钓丝踩在脚下，然后把鱼叉高高举起扎进鱼身。大鱼跳到半空，充分展示了它的美和力量，然后轰隆一声落到水里，浪花溅满老头一身，也溅湿了整条小船。
鱼仰身朝天，银白色的肚皮翻上来，从它心脏流出来的血染红了蓝色的海水。老头把大鱼绑在船边胜利返航。可是一个多小时后鲨鱼嗅到了大鱼的血腥味跟踪而至抢吃鱼肉。老头见到第一条游来的鲨鱼的蓝色的脊背。他把鱼叉准备好，干掉了第一只鲨鱼。几小时后又两条鲨鱼逼近船尾去咬大鱼的尾巴，老头用刀系在船桨上杀死了两条来犯的鲨鱼，但在随后的搏斗中刀也折断了，他又改用短棍。然而半夜里鲨鱼成群结队涌来时，他已无对付他们了，但他坚持搏斗，甚至把船舵都打断了，最后鲨鱼还是吃光了老人两天的辛劳，只剩下鱼头和鱼尾……
船驶进小港老人回到窝棚，天亮后人们看见船旁硕大无比的白色鱼脊骨，大家都惊叹老人桑提亚哥。
一天早上，孩子来看望老头，见到他疲倦得熟睡不醒时不禁放声大哭。老头醒来后，孩子给他端一杯热气腾腾的咖啡。两人相约过几天一起去打鱼，孩子说他还有很东西要学。孩子离去后，老头睡着了，他又梦见非洲的狮子……
对老人与海的评价
由于他精湛的小说艺术——这在其近著《老人与海》中有充分表现——同时还由于他对当代文体的影响。
——获得诺贝尔文学奖评语
《老人与海》是一部异常有力、无比简洁的作品，具有一种无可抗拒的美。
——瑞典文学院院士霍尔斯陶穆
《老人与海》是一首田园诗，大海就是大海，不是拜伦式的，不是麦尔维尔式的，好比荷马的手笔：行文又沉着又动人，犹如荷马的诗。真正的艺术家既不象征化，也不寓言化——海明威是一位真正的艺术家——但是任何一部真正的艺术品都能散发出象征和寓言的意味，这一部短小但并不渺小的杰作也是如此。
——美国艺术史家贝瑞孙
海明威有着一种强烈的愿望，他试图把自己对事物的看法强加于我们，以便塑造出一种硬汉的形象……当他在梦幻中向往胜利时，那就必定会出现完全的胜利、伟大的战斗和圆满的结局。
——美国作家索尔·贝娄
人可以失败，但不可以被击败，外在的肉体可以接受折磨，但是内在的意志却是神圣不可侵犯的，这是《老人与海》一再强调的论点。真正的大师都是用最简单的语言来表达最深刻的道理，真正的好作品都是用生命的历练做题材，《老人与海》所刻画出来的正是海明威的一辈子最好的画像，正如海明威所说，“我一直读过2””多遍，每读一次，我就多一份收获，好像我最后得到了我这一生辛苦工作所欲得到的东西”。
——台湾学者陈人孝
《老人与海》讲了一个老渔夫的故事，但是在这个故事里却揭示了人类共同的命运。我佩服老人的勇气，佩服他不屈不挠的斗争精神，也佩服海明威。
——当代著名作家王小波
在《老人与海》中，读者看到的只有温情。老人和男孩的深厚感情就不说了，连露台酒吧的老板马丁也经常给老人免费的饭吃，而老人则对他的邻居满怀感激，认为“我生活的这个乡镇很友好”。人在这里变成了大写的人，对应着的是自然。
——翻译家李继宏
篇4：对海明威生平的评价英文
Ernest Hemingway is a giant of modern literature. Among twentieth-century American fiction writers, his work is most often compared to that of his contemporaries William Faulkner and F. Scott Fitzgerald. Combined with his outstanding short stories, Hemingway’s four major novels—The Sun Also Rises (1926), A Farewell to Arms (1929), For Whom the Bell Tolls (1940), and The Old Man and the Sea (1952)—comprise a contribution to modern fiction that is far more substantial than Fitzgerald’s and that approximates Faulkner’s.
Faulkner was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature a few years before Hemingway received this recognition, but their respective approaches to fiction are so dissimilar that this belated receipt says little or nothing about Hemingway’s stature relative to that of Faulkner. When set alongside Faulkner’s Mississippi novels, Hemingway’s major works feature simpler structures and narrative voices/personae.
As or more important, Hemingway’s style, with its consistent use of short, concrete, direct prose and of scenes consisting exclusively of dialogue, gives his novels and short stories a distinctive accessibility that is immediately identifiable with the author. Owing to the direct character of both his style and his life-style, there is a tendency to cast Hemingway as a “representative” American writer whose work reflects the bold, forthright and rugged individualism of the American spirit in action.
His own background as a wounded veteran of World War I, as an engaged combatant in the fight against Fascism/Nazism, and as a “he-man” with a passion for outdoor adventures and other manly pursuits reinforce this association.
But this identification of Hemingway as a uniquely American genius is problematic. Although three of his major novels are told by and/or through American men, Hemingway’s protagonists are expatriates, and his fictional settings are in France, Italy, Spain, and later Cuba, rather than America itself.
While Hemingway’s early career benefited from his connections with Fitzgerald and (more so) with American novelist Sherwood Anderson, his aesthetic is actually closer to that shared by the transplanted American poets that he met in Paris during the 1920s; T. S. Eliot, Ezra Pound, and, most crucially, Gertrude Stein. In this context, we must realize that Hemingway’s approach to the craft of fiction is direct but never blunt or just plain simple.
Hemingway’s text is the result of a painstaking selection process, each word performing an assigned function in the narrative. These choices of language, in turn, occur through the mind and experience of his novels’ central characters whether they serve explicitly as narrators of their experience or as focal characters from whose perspectives the story unfolds. The main working corollary of Hemingway’s “iceberg principle” is that the full meaning of the text is not limited to moving the plot forward: there is always a web of association and inference, a submerged reason behind the inclusion (or even the omission) of every detail.
We note, too, that although Hemingway’s novels usually follow a straightforward chronological progression as in the three days of For Whom the Bell Tolls, Hemingway does make use of summary accounts of the past, of memories related externally as stories, and of flashbacks. These devices lend further depth to his characters and create narrative structures that are not completely straightforward chronicles.
Hemingway is direct. But he is also quite subtle, and subtlety is not a trait that we ascribe to the American way. In the end, Hemingway is an international artist, a man who never relinquished his American identity but who entered new territories too broad and too deep to fit within the domain of any national culture.
篇5：对海明威生平的评价英文
Hemingway in the creation of a prominent feature is the shape of a flesh and blood, the distinctive character of the image. Most of these characters are soldiers, journalists, bullfighters, hunters, fishermen, professional boxers, etc., Hemingway with a sincere heart to love them, with a simple ink to praise them. In them, the reader can see a group of distinctive “tough guy” character character image. Hemingway's protagonist is a typical character who has created all his features according to his own experience and created by artistic processing. Hemingway is an intuitionist, he believes that the image of the art of life and soul lies in its high degree of realism. “The writer's job is to tell the truth”, and therefore stressed that writing with a sense of straightforwardness, his novel themes are mostly taken from personal experience and personal experience. As a teenager, Hemingway was very competitive. He was “loyal to all things first, and if he did not get first in a sport, he would give up that sport.” This spirit is manifested in his short story “beat undefeated people”, the old power failure of the bullfighter Manuel in order to safeguard the honor of the past, regardless of the brutal exploitation of the boss and the companions of goodwill discouraged, decided to play bullfighting . In the short life of “Francis Macomber's Short Happy Life,” the author simply asked Wilson to borrow the language of Shakespeare, saying bluntly: “I do not care at all, people can only die once ... anyway this year, ”He finally endured the test of morality and courage under violence, his death confirmed the dignity of his personality, where the author strongly praised the“ tough guy ”fear of death, indomitable attitude towards life. “Gamblers nuns and radio” in the gamblers suffered a robbery, not only bite the bullet and not hum, humor and humor to laugh freely, showing the death of the “relaxed” and “elegant.”“Fifty thousand dollars” in the boxer to hold back the pain down the foul opponent, destroyed a double hoax. This flesh and blood fullness of the characters are the lives of the unfortunate and losers, but they are the spirit of the strong and winners, which is popular in Europe and America so-called “tough guy” character. II Hemingway's creative career, the young Hemingway's “tough guy” image is invincible warrior, reflects the young Hemingway's vigor and indomitable enterprising heart, and his later years of Hemingway's “ Tough guy ”image, it is the vicissitudes of life, repeated setbacks but not willing to fail the spirit of the winner. In his later years of the novel “the old man and the sea” is particularly prominent. Santiago in The Old Man and the Sea is Hemingway 's last tragic hero and the final conclusion of his tough personality.
篇6：对海明威生平的评价英文
Hemingway was born in the United States, from childhood love of nature, like travel, watch the Spanish bullfight ... ... through a variety of ways to exercise their ability to live. 18-year-old on the war, he created a lot of his life works, are based on their own personal experience. On one occasion, Hemingway was distributing chocolate in the trenches, and a shell exploded near him and stunned him. When he regained his intuition, he saw an Italian wounded so badly that he could not move. He immediately put the man back in the back, sent to the first-aid shelter. At this point, his body is blood, the shoe was hit two holes. After a medical examination, he suffered 227 injuries, fortunately, no one in the hip above, so he survived.Injury, he risked his life once again came to the battlefield interview, this kind of spirit is how valuable ah!
His repeated failures at the time had cast a shadow over his own heart, but he remained independent and unrelenting. Finally he won the Nobel Prize, won the attention of the Nobel Prize in Literature. Of course, its success is by no means a flash in the pan, but with its high degree of creativity, in the history of human literature inscribes a lasting impression.
And we now live in a peaceful era, in the excellent environment, why not learn it? When we face a little bit of frustration in life, always help parents, teachers, friends ... ... why can not independent brave to face it? However, the reality is terrible. Some people live with their debauchery, do not give the refugees a penny, only their own happiness, regardless of the pain of others. Such people live in the world is a parasite, there is no sense. Of course, some people all the year round obscure service for the people, dedicated their young life, they have long been out of the life and death. As Hemingway put it, “What a great spirit it is to die in the frail age, when the illusion dies, not as a young man dying in an illusion of happiness, extinguished when the glory is bright and splendid.”
Hemingway, a writer, a Nobel Prize winner, a true hero of the times. Is he let me know how to shape themselves, shape the future; he inspired me to create the spirit of self-improvement; he let me know how to face life!
This book let me understand, although life is full of dangerous and painful, but we have to like a matador “tough guy” spirit to face the suffering of life.
Comments: “Instead of head down life, not as high head dead.” Small writer wrote the world's writers Hemingway's not do the laity of the move; also write their own life in the future, no matter what kind of danger , Should be the same as Hemingway to do a matador-like “tough guy” to face the suffering of life, read to inspire people.
篇7：对罗斯福的评价英文版
“New Deal” just launched, it caused widespread concern in American society from top to bottom, different political groups to give it a different evaluation. Roosevelt's strong opponent, the newspaper king Hearst, said the New Deal was a crude deal; it was not Soak the Rich, but Soak the Successful. John Goodwin, the famous American journalist and writer, said he had heard the best definition of the “New Deal”: “It is an attempt by some gutless liberals to save capitalism for the distraught capitalists.”There was also a condemnation of the “New Deal” as a fascist fascination of liberalism.
American economists have two views on the “New Deal”, one that the “New Deal” in encouraging the confidence of private enterprises without success, the basic conditions for the success of the capitalist order is to encourage entrepreneurial spirit entrepreneurs, and the induction of this spirit will need Stimulus and compensation, “New Deal” some measures is to suppress this spirit. The other group was Keynes and his followers, or half-followers, who argued that Roosevelt was not doing enough to make the national economy on the path of rejuvenation only if it really implemented a bold deficit-raising policy.
From Roosevelt's “New Deal” as the program for the presidency, to the “New Deal” throughout the implementation process, the United States has its two extremes of evaluation: a Roosevelt “New Deal” abandoned the American tradition, the most valuable liberalism Economic model, a socialist country like a “planned economy”, many conservatives (such as former President Hoover) fear Roosevelt will banks, railways and other important national economic sector nationalization, and ultimately the United States onto politics The other is more radical point of view that Roosevelt's reform is not thorough enough radical people initially Roosevelt have great expectations, they hope that through the “New Deal”, Roosevelt can not only solve the current crisis in the United States, But also to solve such as class, poverty, race and other deep-seated problems of American society.
It can be seen that the evaluation of Roosevelt's New Deal in the United States focused on the success of its intervention in the US economy, first, whether it was conducive to the political democratization of the United States.
★ 英文电影影评范文
★ 英语专业毕业论文
【对海明威的评价英文版（精选7篇）】相关文章：
英语专业论文题目2022-05-29
海明威《雨中的猫》的叙事与文体分析2022-05-20
英语专业教学论文题目2023-04-29
模糊综合评价模型在交通建设项目管理中的应用2022-05-02
英语专业论文题目推荐2022-11-10
观后感及影视短论的写作技巧2022-09-04
高中暑假阅读书单2023-10-21
海明威人生英文名人名言2023-04-03
高中如何提高语文阅读技巧2023-07-20
《老人与海》读后感作文500字左右2023-08-22