当前位置：首页 > 讲话发言 > 演讲稿> ted关于成功的演讲稿

ted关于成功的演讲稿

时间：2022-10-25 08:02:40 演讲稿收藏本文下载本文

ted关于成功的演讲稿（精选18篇）由网友“洁哥大狗熊”投稿提供，下面是小编给大家整理后的ted关于成功的演讲稿，欢迎大家借鉴与参考，希望对大家有所帮助。

ted关于成功的演讲稿

篇1：ted关于成功的演讲稿

ted关于成功的演讲稿1:能持久的意志力是成功关键

丘吉尔说：成功的秘诀就是：坚持、坚持、再坚持

股神”巴菲特成功的秘诀：耐力胜过脑力

朱熹：立志不坚，终不济事。

毛泽东：苟有恒，何必三更起五更眠;最无益，只怕一日曝十日寒

…….

这样的名言警句我年青时背过不少，但回头想想，什么也没有坚持下来什么，除了每天看两三个TED演讲坚持了多年，并通过TEDtoChina分享给更多人，算来现在也有一千多个演讲了，从个人开拓视野，思考新知的角度来说，这是一种成功。

关于意志力、持久心对于『成功』的影响大多是一两句的泛泛而谈，很少有人从心理学或者统计学上做深入研究。在的TED教育专题上Angela Lee就分享了她在这方面的研究。

Angela在27岁时辞去很悲催的管理咨询工作，转而到纽约公立学校教七年级数学。她发现最好和最差学生的差异并不仅仅是智商，坚韧的性格起很大作用，几年的教学经验使她相信：我们的教育所需要的是一种对学生、对学习更好的理解—— 从动机的角度、从心理的角度去理解，而不仅仅是智商单一的维度。后来Angela继续她的心理学博士学习，研究儿童与成人在各种艰巨挑战中的表现，看谁会成功?为什么会成功?

她和研究团队去西点军校，尝试预测哪些学员能通过军事训练，哪些会放弃;去看全国拼字比赛，预测哪些孩子能在比赛中笑到最后;研究在非常艰苦的环境下工作的新教师，预测哪些教师能坚持这份职业，预测哪些教师教出的学生成绩的提高最为显著;她和公司合作预测哪些销售人员能保住饭碗?谁能赚最多钱?… …在不同的背景下，她发现意志力指标是观测重点，而非社交能力、美丽的外貌、健康的身体，更不是智商。

意志力是什么?是面对长远目标时的热情和毅力，是有耐力的表现，是日复一日依然对未来坚信不已——不只是这周、不只是这个月，而是年复一年地用心、努力工作来实现所坚信的那个未来。意志力是将生活看作是一场马拉松而非短跑。

Angela在芝加哥公立学校研究意志力时请数以千计高中生填写关于意志力的问卷，然后等了大约一年多看看谁会毕业。结果发现，意志力越坚定的孩子毕业的可能性明显越高，而家庭收入，标准化测验的分数等指标则的相关性则没那么强。她的调查资料非常清楚地揭示有很多才华横溢的人并不能坚持到底。事实上，意志力通常与才华无关，有时甚至成反比。

意志力不仅仅对学校学生重要，创业者、普通员工任何人都很重要。在我组织TEDx活动时认识很多NGO从业者、创业者、艺术家、成功企业家等，他们都是有故事的人，在和他们的访谈中，他们都有一个共通点：不懈的坚持、强大的意志力让他们成为与众不同的、脱颖而出的一群人。

意志力如此重要，如何锻炼加强这种性格要素?科学界对于如何锻炼意志力知之甚少。家长经常问老师 “如何锻炼孩子们的意志力? 我怎么教会孩子坚实的职业道德? 怎样才能让他们有长远的动力?” 这个没人能回答，如果哪位家长来问我，我会反问：您为人父母，你有意志力嘛?您能给孩子做个意志力的榜样吗?我相信父母是培养孩子意志力的第一责任人。

关于锻炼孩子们的意志，到目前为止最好的理论斯坦福大学Carol Dweck教授的“成长型思维模式”理论，这个理论相信学习的能力不是一成不变的，它会由于你的努力发生变化。当孩子们在学习大脑的相关知识，以及大脑在面对挑战时会怎样变化和成长时，他们更有可能在失败时继续坚持，因为他们不相信他们永远会失败。

这个TED演讲人Angela也令人钦佩，她在研究学生意志力项目上坚持多年，看看她其中跨越一年的高中生毕业项目就知道，她有不懈的意志，做研究也需要这样的耐力，这个是我们很多研究人员缺乏的。

意志力决定你的未来。Grit is sticking with your future — day in, day out, not just for the week, not just for the month, but for years — and working really hard to make that future a reality 不懈的意志，我缺，我太缺了!我是反面教材。

TED演讲成功的秘诀:

一前期准备工作

当我想到要做一个扣人心弦的演讲，在我脑海中浮现的是去带着观众踏上一段旅途。

1.做好提纲

除非你有值得一说的东西，不然你就做不了一个好的演讲。而对你想说的内容进行提炼和建立结构是准备过程中最重要的部分。

2.讲一个故事

我们都知道人们很喜欢听故事，而那些最引人入胜的叙述结构中都有着大量的隐喻。当我想到要做一个扣人心弦的演讲，在我脑海中浮现的是去带着观众踏上一段旅途。一个成功的演讲是一个小小的奇迹，人们由此看到不同的世界。

如果你把故事当作一段旅途，最重要的便是找出从哪里开始、到哪里结束。想想观众们对你的故事可能已经有了哪些了解、他们有多关心它，以此找到合适的起点。

最棒的演讲者会非常快速地介绍主题，解释他们自己为什么会对这个话题感兴趣，并说服观众相信他们也应该关注这个主题。

3.突出重点

我在演讲者的初稿中发现的最大问题是会涵盖太多内容。你无法在一个演讲中去概括整个行业。如果你试图将你知道的所有东西都塞进演讲，那就没时间去举出关键的细节了，而且你的演讲会因各种抽象的语言而晦涩难懂，从而会导致本身就懂的人能听得懂，而之前不懂的人就不知所云了。

你需要举出具体的例子来使你的想法有血有肉，充实起来。

不要一心想把所有东西都纳入到一个短短的演讲。相反地，要深入。不要告诉我们你研究的整个领域，告诉我们你的独特贡献。

当然，过度阐述或者纠结于内容的意义也不可行。对这种情况有另一套补救的方法。记住，观众们很聪明。让他们自己去找寻出一些意义，去各自归纳收获的结论。

4.营造悬念

很多顶级的演讲具有着侦探小说般的叙事结构，演讲者引出问题开始演讲，然后介绍寻求解决方法的过程，直到恍然大悟的一刻，这时观众自会看到这一切叙述的意义。

如果一个演讲失败了，几乎都是因为讲者没有设计好整个故事，错误估计了观众的兴趣点，或者忽略了故事本身。即使话题再重要，没有足够的叙述作为铺垫，反而偶然冒出一些武断的意见总会让人感到不爽。没有一个递进的过程，就不会感到自己有所收获。

二想好演讲方式

我认为最简单且实用的方法就是上台前做一下深呼吸。

1.最受欢迎的演讲都是背好了讲

一旦你想好怎么说故事了，就可以开始重点考虑具体的演讲方式。发表一个演讲有三个主要的途径：1、照着手稿或提词器直接读;2、记下演讲提纲来提示你要讲的具体内容;3、记住全部内容。

我的建议是：别照着读，也别使用提词器。一旦被人们看出来你在照着读，观众们的注意力就会转移。突然你就与观众变得疏远。

我们很多最受欢迎的TED演讲都是逐字逐句完全记下来的。如果你有充裕的时间做这样的准备，这其实就是最好的演讲方式。

2.使用亲切的谈话式语气

有些讲者倾向于较为权威、装逼、强硬或热切的语气，可是谈话式的语气会听上去更令人舒服。

如果成功的演讲是一次旅途，那就不要在过程中惹恼你的旅伴。有些讲者表现得太过于自我。他们表现得非常优越、人生成功而圆满，但观众们就会感到无语。千万别这样。

3.减少下半身的移动

就那些毫无经验的演讲者而言，肢体表现是演讲中最难的一部分，不过人们却会太容易高估它的作用。用对措辞、说好故事、以及演讲的内容要比你站姿如何、看起来是否紧张更大程度地决定演讲能否成功。对台风而言，一定程度上的训练就有很大帮助。

我们在早期排练时候发现的最常见的错误，是人们会过于频繁地移动身体。他们会晃来晃去，或者把重心在两腿间不停移动。如此容易分散观众的注意力。其实，只要减少下半身的移动就可大大提高台风。

4.把握眼神交流

在台上最关键的肢体语言或许应该是眼神交流。在观众席里找五六位看起来顺眼的，演讲时用眼神和她们交流，把他们当成你很久没见的老朋友，想象你正把他们带进你的工作中来。这样的眼神交流相当有效，它比其他任何方法都要对你的演讲有帮助。即使你没有充足的时间做好准备，必须得照着稿子读，那么抬起头做一些眼神上的交流会让一切变得不同。

5.如何面对紧张

对无经验的演讲者而言，另一个大挑战就是紧张，不同人应对紧张有不同的处理方法。很多讲者在演讲前会呆在观众席中，这方法很有效，因为听前面的演讲者演讲可以转移注意力并减少紧张。

我认为最简单且实用的方法就是上台前做一下深呼吸。真心有效。

就算不能完全克服紧张，也没关系，观众们其实也预料得到你会紧张。紧张能使你表现得更好：它给予你表现的力量，并保持你思维敏捷。稳住呼吸，一切都没问题的!

甚至，承认紧张也可以带来魅力。大胆展示出你的脆弱，无论是紧张亦或是你的语音语调，只要是实在的，都是赢得观众倾心的有力武器。在TED大会上演讲的苏珊·凯恩就特怕做演讲。你可以感觉到她在台上时的脆弱，这种感受让观众都为她加油—所有人在结束后都想拥抱她。努力使她美丽，也使她的演讲成为当年最受欢迎的一个。

6.恰当采用多媒体技术

现在为我们所用的多媒体技术数不胜数，所以觉得怎么也得用幻灯片吧，什么都不用都觉得对有点不起观众。现在大多数人都知道PPT的诀窍：保持简洁;不要把幻灯片做成演讲稿(就好比列出你所要讲的每一点—这些最好写在你手中的小卡片里);不要把幻灯片上的内容原封不动地大声念出来。

许多顶尖的TED演讲者不用幻灯片，而且很多演讲内容也不需要它。如果你要用到视频，那么，把它剪辑得足够短—如果长于1分钟，你就有可能失去观众了。还有，任何带配乐的视频都可能会让人倒胃口。而且无论如何，别放你自己被电视台采访的视频。我曾看过有演讲者这么做，而且真不怎么样—没人会想要了解你的自大。观众已经在你面前听你现场演讲了，为什么还要同时让他们到看你出现在新闻采访的特写镜头中呢?

篇2：TED成功励志的演讲稿

我要跟大家坦白一件事。但首先，我要各位也对我坦白，如果相对来说，你去年压力不大的，请举手，有吗?那觉得承受的压力算普通的呢?有没有倍觉压力的? 看来我们都一样。

我要坦承的是，我是一名健康心理学家，我的职责就是让人们更健康快乐。不过我担心自己这来传授的与压力有关的内容，恐怕弊多于利。这些年我不断跟人说，压力会让人生病，患有从一般感冒到心血管疾病的风险都随之升高。基本上我把压力当作敌人，但我对压力的看法已经变了，而我今天就是要让你们改观。

先来谈让我对压力另有看法的研究。这研究追踪在美国的3万名成人历时8年，研究首先问这些人「去年你感受到了多大压力?」，同时问他们「你相信压力有碍健康吗?」，之后研究人员以公开的死亡统计找出参与者中去逝的人。

好，先说坏消息：前一年压力颇大的人死亡的风险增加了43%，但这只适用于那些相信压力有碍健康的人、承受极大压力的人，若不将此视为有害死亡的风险就不会升高。事实上，与压力相对较小的研究参与者相比，这样的人死亡风险反而最低。

研究人员花了8年追踪死亡案例18.2万，美国人过早离世原因并不是压力本身，而是认为压力有害的这个想法。估计超过2万人符合这情形。若估计正确，「相信压力有害」就成为美国去年的第15大死因，致死率更胜皮肤癌、爱滋病和谋杀。

你们应能体会为何这研究让我担心害怕了，我一直努力告诉他人压力有碍健康。

因此这研究使我想知道：改变对压力的看法，是否能促进健康? 显然科学对此抱以肯定，改变看待压力的方式，生理上的压力反应亦随之改变。

1、第一项研究

如果你此刻的确在(社会压力测试的)研究中，你或许已经有点儿承受不住了。你的心跳开始加快，你的呼吸开始便急促，可能还会开始冒汗。通常，我们认为这些生理上的变化是紧张的表现，说明我们无法很好的应对压力。

但是，如果我们将这些表现看做是身体进入备战状态的表现会怎么样?在哈佛大学的一项研究中，参与者正是这么被告知的。实验参与者进入社会压力测试之前被告知，他们面对压力时的反应是有益的。心跳加速是为下一步行为做准备。如果你的呼吸变急促，没关系，它会让你的大脑获得更多的氧气。那些被如此告知的参与者反道比较不那么崩溃、比较不紧张，更加自信，但更让人欣喜的发现是，他们的生理反应也随情绪有了变化。

2、第二项研究

我想通过另一个研究来结束今天的演讲。听好咯，因为这项研究可以救命。这项研究在美国找了1000个年龄在34岁到93岁间的人，他们通过一个问题开始了该研究：“去年的你，感受到了多大的压力?”他们还问了另一个问题：“你花了多少时间帮助朋友、邻居和社区里的其他人?”接着他们用接下来五年的公共记录来看参与者中有谁去世了。

那好，先说坏消息：生活中每个重大的压力事件，例如财政困难或者家庭危机，会增加30%的死亡风险。但是，我估计你们也在期待这个“但是”，并不是对每个人都是那样。那些花时间关心其他人的人完全没有体现出压力相关的死亡风险。零风险。关心让我们更有韧性。

于是我们再次看到压力对于健康的有害影响并不是不可避免的。如何对待和应对压力可以转变你面对压力的体验。当你选择将压力反应视为有益的，你会在生理上变得有勇气。当你选择压力下与他人沟通，你的生命会更有韧性。

TED成功励志的演讲稿 2：考试不及格的积极意义

我听说，在芝加哥有一所高中，那儿的学生毕业前要通过一系列课程，如果某一门课没有通过，成绩就是“暂未通过”。我想，这真是个绝妙的做法，因为，如果你某门课的成绩不及格，你会想，我什么都不是，我什么都没有学到。但如果你的成绩是“暂未通过”，你会明白，学习的步伐并没有停下，你还需逐步向前，争取未来。

“暂未通过”也让我联想起一件尤为重要的发生在我职业生涯初期的事情这件事对我而言是一个转折点。当时，我想探究孩子是如何应对挑战和困难的，因此，我让一些10岁大的孩子尝试解决一些对于他们而言稍稍偏难的问题。一些孩子积极应对的方式让我感到震惊。他们会这样说，“我喜欢挑战，”或说，“你知道的，我希望能有所获。”这些孩子明白，他们的能力是可以提升的。他们有我所说的成长型思维模式。但另一些孩子觉得面对这些难题是不幸，宛如面对一场灾难。从他们的固定型思维角度来看，他们的才智受到了评判，而他们失败了。他们不懂得享受学习的过程，而只盯住眼前的成与败，

这些孩子们后面表现如何?让我告诉你他们的表现。在一项研究中，他们告诉我们，如果他们某次考试未通过，他们很可能会在下次考试中作弊，而不是更加努力地学习。在另一项研究中，他们挂了一门后，他们会找到那些考得还不如他们高的孩子，以寻求自我安慰。后续的研究陆续表明，他们会逃避困难。科学家们监测了学生们面对错误时的脑电活动图像。在左侧，是固定型思维模式的学生，几乎没有什么活动。他们在错误面前选择了逃避。他们没有积极地投入。但请看右侧，这是成长型思维模式的学生，这些学生相信能力会通过锻炼得以提升。他们积极地应对错误。他们的大脑在高速运转，他们积极地投入，他们剖析错误，从中学习，最终订正。

如今我们是如何教育孩子的呢?是教育他们专注眼前，而不是注重过程吗?我们培育了一些迷恋刷A的孩子们吗?我们培育了没有远大理想的孩子们吗?他们最远大的目标就是再拿一个A，心里所想的就是下一次考试吗?他们在今后的生活中，都以分数的高低来评判自己吗?或许是的，因为企业雇主们跑来找我，说我们养育的这新一代走上工作岗位的人，如果不给他们奖励，他们一天都过不下去。

我们该怎么做呢?如何让孩子注重过程而不是结果呢?

我们可以做这样几件事。首先，我们可以有技巧地去表扬：不去表扬天分或才智，这行不通。不要再这样做了。而是要对孩子积极投入的过程进行表扬：他们的努力与策略，他们的专注、坚持与进步。对过程的表扬会塑造孩子的韧性。

还有其他的办法来奖励过程。最近，我们与来自华盛顿大学的游戏研究者合作，制作了一款奖励过程的数学游戏。在这个游戏中，学生们因他们的努力、策略与进步而受到奖励。通常的数学游戏中，玩家只有在解得正确答案后才能得到奖励，但这个游戏奖励过程。随着游戏的深入，孩子们更加努力，想出更多的策略，身心更加投入，当遇到尤为困难的问题时，他们也展现了更为持久的韧劲。

我们发现，注重过程的思维模式，会赋予孩子们更多自信，指引他们不断向前，越发坚持不懈。事实上，我们能够改变学生的思维模式。在一项研究中，我们告诉学生们，每当他们迫使自己走出舒适区，学习新知识，迎接新挑战，大脑中的神经元会形成新的更强的连接，他们会逐渐变得越来越聪明。

看看后面发生了什么吧：在这项研究中，没有接受成长型思维模式训练的学生，在这一困难的过渡阶段，成绩持续下滑，但那些受过该训练的学生，成绩强势反弹，卓有起色。如今，我们已证实这一结论，通过成千上万个孩子的实例，尤其是那些在学业上挣扎的孩子。

那我们就来谈谈教育平等吧。在我们国家，有些特定区域的孩子总是在学业上处于下游，比如，内城区的孩子，或印第安人居留地里的孩子。长期以来这里的孩子都没什么起色，以致于很多人认为没的救了。但是当教育家们将孩子的思维转变为成长型思维模式时，教育平等实现了。举几个例子吧。纽约哈莱姆区的一所幼儿园的学生在一年的时间内，国家水平测试(NationalAchievementTest)成绩飞跃到前百分之五。这些孩子中有很多在入学时甚至还不会握笔。一年之内，远远落后的南布朗克斯区的四年级学生，其标准数学测试成绩攀升到纽约州所有四年级学生的第一名。在一年到一年半的时间内，某印第安人居留地的一所学校里的学生成绩从全区垫底到名列前茅，而这个区包括了西雅图市的富饶地段。印第安孩子战胜了“微软”孩子。

这得以实现的原因，是努力与困难的意义在孩子心目中发生了改变。在此之前，努力与困难让他们感觉自己很笨，让他们想放弃，但如今，正是努力与困难让他们大脑中的神经元得以形成新的连接，更强的连接。正是在这个过程中，他们变得越来越聪明。

最近，我收到一个13岁男孩的来信。他说，“亲爱的德韦克教授，我欣赏你的著作，因为它们都基于可靠的科学试验，因此，我决定将你的方法付诸实践。我更用功地学习，更用心地处好与家人的关系，与同学的关系，而在这些方面我都有了长足的进步。现在我才意识到，过去浪费了太多生命。”

让我们不再浪费生命，因为，既然我们知道能力可以增长，那么，生活在一个能激发进步并让这一切变得可能的地方就是每个孩子的权利。

谢谢。

篇3：TED成功励志的演讲稿

艾米·穆林斯，Aimee Mullins，残奥会短跑冠军。天生没有腓骨，在婴儿时期就作了膝盖以下的双腿截肢。她学习靠义肢走路、跑步——在国家级和国际级的短跑比赛中夺冠，并在阿特兰大残奥会破纪录。她在Gerogetown读历史和外交两个专业，成为美国大学生体育协会第一级田径比赛的第一个双腿截肢选手。毕业后，Mullins做过一些模特工作——包括Alexander McQueen的一个传奇的天桥时装秀。然后她参加过一些演出，在Matthew Barney的《悬丝》中以豹皇后的形象出现。

她是一名运动员、模特和演员。她接受了膝盖以下的双腿截肢。她把义肢比作太阳眼镜。她说：“只要态度坚定，你就可以不管任何东西，就像她的出现把人们吓得目瞪口呆那样。”

当时我正与一群约有三百名的小孩说话，年龄为六至八岁，在一间儿童博物馆。而我带了一个装满义肢的袋子，跟你们在这里看到的差不多，还将它们摆放在一张桌子上，给小孩看。就我的经验而言，孩子天生充满好奇心，尤其是对于他们不知道、不明白，或是对他们而言陌生的事物。

他们只学到对差异性感到害怕，当大人影响他们做出那样的表现，也或许是压抑了他们本有的好奇心，又或是，不允许他们问问题，希望他们变成有礼貌的小孩。所以，我想像一年级的老师走出大堂，带著一群不守规矩的孩子，老师会说：“好啦，不管怎样，就是别盯著她的腿看。”

但是，问题就在这儿。我之所以会在那儿，就是想让孩子们观察和探索。所以我就和大人达成了协定，让孩子们在没有成人陪伴下进来待两分钟。门打开后，孩子们俯身摆弄起义肢。他们这儿戳戳那儿碰碰，摇摇脚趾头，还试著把整个身体压在短跑义肢上，看看会有什么反应。

我说道：“孩子们，动动脑。我今天早上醒来，决定要能够跳过这幢房子，没什么大不了的，不过两三层的高度。但是，如果你能想到，任何动物、超级英雄、卡通人物，任何你梦想成为的人、物，你会给我造一副什麽样的腿呢?”

立即有孩子答道：“袋鼠!” “不对，不对!应该是青蛙!” “不对，应该是神探加杰特(上世纪80年代动画人物)!” “不对，不对，都不对!应该是超人特攻队(迪士尼出品动画电影)。”还有其他一些我不太熟悉的人物。然后，一个8岁的孩子说道：“海，为什么你不想飞呢?”所有在场的人，包括我，都惊叹道“对啊”。(笑声)就这样，我从一个女人，从一个这些孩子被告知用「残疾」来形容的人，变成了一个拥有他们所没有之潜能的人，一个很有可能有超人能力的人。很有趣吧!

在座有些人前在TED见过我，当时人们热烈讨论这种演讲是如何改变人生，不管你是听众还是发言人，我也不例外。TED可以说是开启了我之后10年的探索。当时，我展示的义肢是修复术的创新技术，我当时接上了碳纤维製成仿猎豹后肢的短跑义肢，可能你们昨天有看过。而这些喷漆硅胶义肢是这样的栩栩如生。

当时，我有机会号召传统医学修复领域之外的革新者，让他们把才智与科学、艺术相结合来製造义肢。这样我们就不必把外观、功能和美学划分开来，并赋予不同的价值。幸运的是，很多人作出了回应，旅程就这样开始了，很有趣。当时和我一起的还有一个TED与会者Chee Pearlman，希望她今天也在场。她当时是一本名为《ID》的杂志编辑，她将我的照片放在封面。

接下来我开始了一场奇妙的旅程，当时我碰到了很多奇妙的人和事，许多人邀请我去世界各地演讲，关于仿猎豹义肢技术。人们在演讲后找上我。不论男女，谈话内容不外乎「要知道，Aimme，你很迷人，一点不像有残疾」。(笑声)我想，这太好了，因为我一点也不自觉是残障，这真的大大地打开了我对这个主题的眼界。

美也可以被探索，一个美丽的女人应该长什麽样?什麽是性感的身体?很有趣的是，从一个人的角度看，残疾意味著什麽?我是说，有人——像Pamela Anderson(美国艳星，以胸大著称)整形比我多，可没人说她残疾。(笑声)

后来这期《ID》杂志经美术设计师Peter Saville之手，传到了时装设计师Alexander McQueen和摄影师Nick Knight手中，他们也对探索相关方面很感兴趣。参加完TED三个月后，我搭上了前往伦敦的航班，摄製我的第一组时尚杂志照片。结果可以从这本杂志封面看出「时尚」吗?

三个月后，我初次为Alexander McQueen走秀，穿戴著一副实木手工义肢，没有人知道——大家都以为那是木靴。事实上，它们现在就在台上，葡萄藤、木兰花，令人惊豔。诗意很重要，能把陈腐和受忽视的东西提升到高层次，进入艺术的境界，能把令人生畏的东西转化成引人入胜的东西，让人驻足良久，甚至他们可能会理解。

这些是从我下一个冒险中学到的。艺术家Matthew Barney在他的影片《悬丝》，也就是这部影片让我真正地察觉到，我的义肢竟可以成为雕塑品。这时，我开始不需要模仿人体，在美学上我是完美的。后来我们研制了人们称为「玻璃腿」的义肢。虽然它们实际上是由剔透的聚胺甲酸酯製成，也就是製造保龄球的材料，很重!后来我们塑造了这种用泥土做的义肢，其中有马铃薯的根系，再把甜菜根种在顶端，还装上了很可爱的铜质脚趾，就这样完成了一项杰作。

另一个造型是半女半豹，是对我运动员生涯的小小致敬，14个小时的义肢彩绘，才看起来像有灵活爪子，尾巴摇来摇去的生物，有点像壁虎。(笑声)另一副我们合作的是这一双脚，看起来有那麽一点像水母，同样也是聚胺甲酸酯製成的。这副义肢唯一的用途就是除了电影裡的展示，就是给人们感官刺激并激发人们的想像，所以奇思妙想很重要。

今天，我带了至少十二副义肢，它们是由不同的人为我製作的。不同的义肢给了我对脚下大地的不同体验。我还可以改变身高，我有五种不同的身高。今天，我有6尺1(约186cm)。我身上这副义肢大概是一年前做的，在英国的多西特整形外科做的，我把它们带回曼哈顿的家裡。

我回来后第一次外出是去参加一场高级宴会，舞会上有个我认识多年的女士，不过那时我只有5尺8(约177cm)。她看到我惊讶不已，她说道：“你怎麽那麽高!”我说道：“是啊，挺好玩的，不是吗?”有点像站在踩高跷，我从此对门框的高度有了全新体验，这是始料未及的，我乐在其中。她看著我说道：“但是，Aimme，这可不公平”，最奇妙的是她是认真的，能随意改变身高，可不公平。

那时我才知道，也就是这时我才知道社会上人们的话题在近10年来已有了重大变革。不再只是克服先天障碍，是关于提升，是关于潜能。义肢的作用不再仅局限于代替身体缺失的部分，它们可以作为一种象徵，象徵使用者可以在属于他们的空间里随心所欲地创造东西。所以那些社会一度认为是残障的人，可以成为塑造自己个性的建筑师，并且的确在继续改变那些个性，仅凭设计自己的身体，从一个赋予你能力的地方获取灵感。

现在令我激动不已的是通过尖端科技，机器人技术、仿生学及由来已久的诗意，我们向瞭解自身的集体人性迈进了一步。我认为要发掘自身人性的全部潜质，就要赞美那些令人心碎的力量，那些光荣的残缺，人人都有。

我想起了莎士比亚笔下的夏洛克：「你们要是用刀剑刺我们，我们不是也会出血的吗?你们要是搔我们的痒，我们不是也会笑出来的吗?」这就是我们的人性，及其所有的潜质，也正是这些让我们熠熠生辉。谢谢。

篇4：Ted 演讲稿精选

when i was nine years old i went off to summer camp for the first time. and my mother packed me a suitcase full of books, which to me seemed like a perfectly natural thing to do. because in my family, reading was the primary group activity. and this might sound antisocial to you, but for us it was really just a different way of being social. you have the animal warmth of your family sitting right next to you, but you are also free to go roaming around the adventureland inside your own mind. and i had this idea that camp was going to be just like this, but better. (laughter) i had a vision of 10 girls sitting in a cabin cozily reading books in their matching nightgowns.

(laughter)

camp was more like a keg party without any alcohol. and on the very first day our counselor gathered us all together and she taught us a cheer that she said we would be doing every day for the rest of the summer to instill camp spirit. and it went like this: “r-o-w-d-i-e, that's the way we spell rowdie. rowdie, rowdie, let's get rowdie.” yeah. so i couldn't figure out for the life of me why we were supposed to be so rowdy, or why we had to spell this word incorrectly. (laughter) but i recited a cheer. i recited a cheer along with everybody else. i did my best. and i just waited for the time that i could go off and read my books.

but the first time that i took my book out of my suitcase, the coolest girl in the bunk came up to me and she asked me, “why are you being so mellow?” -- mellow, of course, being the exact opposite of r-o-w-d-i-e. and then the second time i tried it, the counselor came up to me with a concerned expression on her face and she repeated the point about camp spirit and said we should all work very hard to be outgoing.

and so i put my books away, back in their suitcase, and i put them under my bed, and there they stayed for the rest of the summer. and i felt kind of guilty about this. i felt as if the books needed me somehow, and they were calling out to me and i was forsaking them. but i did forsake them and i didn't open that suitcase again until i was back home with my family at the end of the summer.

now, i tell you this story about summer camp. i could have told you 50 others just like it -- all the times that i got the message that somehow my quiet and introverted style of being was not necessarily the right way to go, that i should be trying to pass as more of an extrovert. and i always sensed deep down that this was wrong and that introverts were pretty excellent just as they were. but for years i denied this intuition, and so i became a wall street lawyer, of all things, instead of the writer that i had always longed to be -- partly because i needed to prove to myself that i could be bold and assertive too. and i was always going off to crowded bars when i really would have preferred to just have a nice dinner with friends. and i made these self-negating choices so reflexively, that i wasn't even aware that i was making them.

篇5：ted演讲稿精选

chinese restaurants have played an important role in american history, as a matter of fact. the cuban missile crisis was resolved in a chinese restaurant called yenching palace in washington, d.c., which unfortunately is closed now, and about to be turned into walgreen's. and the house that john wilkes booth planned the assassination of abraham lincoln is actually also now a chinese restaurant called wok 'n roll, on h street in washington.

事实上，中国餐馆在美国历史上发挥了很重要的作用。古巴导弹危机是在华盛顿一家名叫“燕京馆”的中餐馆里解决的。很不幸，这家餐馆现在关门了，即将被改建成沃尔格林连锁药店。而约翰·威尔克斯·布斯刺杀林肯总统的那所房子现在也成了一家中餐馆，就是位于华盛顿的“锅和卷”。

and if you think about it, a lot of the foods that you think of or we think of or americans think of as chinese food are barely recognizable to chinese, for e_ample: beef with broccoli, egg rolls, general tso's chicken, fortune cookies, chop suey, the take-out bo_es.

如果你仔细想想，就会发现很多你们所认为或我们所认为，或是美国人所认为的中国食物，中国人并不认识。比如西兰花牛肉、蛋卷、左宗棠鸡、幸运饼干、杂碎、外卖盒子。

so, the interesting question is, how do you go from fortune cookies being something that is japanese to being something that is chinese? well, the short answer is, we locked up all the japanese during world war ii, including those that made fortune cookies, so that's the time when the chinese moved in, kind of saw a market opportunity and took over.

所以有趣的是，幸运饼干是怎么从日本的东西变成中国的东西的呢?简单地说，我们在二战时扣押了所以的日本人，包括那些做幸运饼干的。这时候，中国人来了，看到了商机，自然就据为己有了。

general tso's chicken -- which, by the way, in the us naval academy is called admiral tso's chicken. i love this dish. the original name in my book was actually called the long march of general tso, and he has marched very far indeed, because he is sweet, he is fried, and he is chicken -- all things that americans love.

左宗棠鸡，在美国海军军校被称为左司令鸡。我很喜欢这道菜。在我的书里，这道菜实际上叫左将军的长征，它确实在美国很受欢迎，因为它是甜的，油炸的，是鸡肉做的——全部都是美国人的最爱。

so, you know, i realized when i was there, general tso is kind of a lot like colonel sanders in america, in that he's known for chicken and not war. but in china, this guy's actually known for war and not chicken.

我意识到左宗棠将军有点像美国的桑德斯上校(肯德基创始人)，因为他是因鸡肉而出名的而不是战争。而在中国，左宗棠确实是因为战争而不是鸡肉闻名的。

so it's kind of part of the phenomenon i called spontaneous self-organization, right, where, like in ant colonies, where little decisions made by -- on the micro-level actually have a big impact on the macro-level.

这就有点像我所说的自发组织现象。就像在蚂蚁群中，在微观层面上做的小小决定会在宏观层面上产生巨大的影响。

and the great innovation of chicken mcnuggets was not nuggetfying them, because that's kind of an easy concept, but the trick behind chicken mcnuggets was, they were able to remove the chicken from the bone in a cost-effective manner, which is why it took so long for other people to copy them.

麦乐鸡块的发明并没有给他们带来切实收益，因为这个想法很简单，但麦乐鸡背后的技巧是如何用一种划算的方式来把鸡肉从骨头上剔出来。这就是为什么过了这么久才有人模仿他们。

we can think of chinese restaurants perhaps as linu_: sort of an open source thing, right, where ideas from one person can be copied and propagated across the entire system, that there can be specialized versions of chinese food, you know, depending on the region.

我们可以把中餐馆比作linu_：一种开源系统。一个人的想法可以在整个系统中被复制，被普及。在不同的地区，就有特别版本的中国菜。

篇6：ted演讲稿精选

简介：残奥会短跑冠军aimee mullins天生没有腓骨，从小就要学习靠义肢走路和奔跑。如今，她不仅是短跑选手、演员、模特，还是一位稳健的演讲者。她不喜欢字典中 “disabled”这个词，因为负面词汇足以毁掉一个人。但是，坦然面对不幸，你会发现等待你的是更多的机会。

i'd like to share with you a discovery that i made a few months ago while writing an article for italian wired. i always keep my thesaurus handy whenever i'm writing anything, but i'd already finished editing the piece, and i realized that i had never once in my life looked up the word “disabled” to see what i'd find.

let me read you the entry. “disabled, adjective: crippled, helpless, useless, wrecked, stalled, maimed, wounded, mangled, lame, mutilated, run-down, worn-out, weakened, impotent, castrated, paralyzed, handicapped, senile, decrepit, laid-up, done-up, done-for, done-in cracked-up, counted-out; see also hurt, useless and weak. antonyms, healthy, strong, capable.” i was reading this list out loud to a friend and at first was laughing, it was so ludicrous, but i'd just gotten past “mangled,” and my voice broke, and i had to stop and collect myself from the emotional shock and impact that the assault from these words unleashed.

you know, of course, this is my raggedy old thesaurus so i'm thinking this must be an ancient print date, right? but, in fact, the print date was the early 1980s, when i would have been starting primary school and forming an understanding of myself outside the family unit and as related to the other kids and the world around me. and, needless to say, thank god i wasn't using a thesaurus back then. i mean, from this entry, it would seem that i was born into a world that perceived someone like me to have nothing positive whatsoever going for them, when in fact, today i'm celebrated for the opportunities and adventures my life has procured.

so, i immediately went to look up the __ online edition, e_pecting to find a revision worth noting. here's the updated version of this entry. unfortunately, it's not much better. i find the last two words under “near antonyms,” particularly unsettling: “whole” and “wholesome.”

so, it's not just about the words. it's what we believe about people when we name them with these words. it's about the values behind the words, and how we construct those values. our language affects our thinking and how we view the world and how we view other people. in fact, many ancient societies, including the greeks and the romans, believed that to utter a curse verbally was so powerful, because to say the thing out loud brought it into e_istence. so, what reality do we want to call into e_istence: a person who is limited, or a person who's empowered? by casually doing something as simple as naming a person, a child, we might be putting lids and casting shadows on their power. wouldn't we want to open doors for them instead?

one such person who opened doors for me was my childhood doctor at the a.i. dupont institute in wilmington, delaware. his name was dr. pizzutillo, an italian american, whose name, apparently, was too difficult for most americans to pronounce, so he went by dr. p. and dr. p always wore really colorful bow ties and had the very perfect disposition to work with children.

i loved almost everything about my time spent at this hospital, with the e_ception of my physical therapy sessions. i had to do what seemed like innumerable repetitions of e_ercises with these thick, elastic bands -- different colors, you know -- to help build up my leg muscles, and i hated these bands more than anything -- i hated them, had names for them. i hated them. and, you know, i was already bargaining, as a five year-old child, with dr. p to try to get out of doing these e_ercises, unsuccessfully, of course. and, one day, he came in to my session -- e_haustive and unforgiving, these sessions -- and he said to me, “wow. aimee, you are such a strong and powerful little girl, i think you're going to break one of those bands. when you do break it, i'm going to give you a hundred bucks.”

now, of course, this was a simple ploy on dr. p's part to get me to do the e_ercises i didn't want to do before the prospect of being the richest five-year-old in the second floor ward, but what he effectively did for me was reshape an awful daily occurrence into a new and promising e_perience for me. and i have to wonder today to what e_tent his vision and his declaration of me as a strong and powerful little girl shaped my own view of myself as an inherently strong, powerful and athletic person well into the future.

this is an e_ample of how adults in positions of power can ignite the power of a child. but, in the previous instances of those thesaurus entries, our language isn't allowing us to evolve into the reality that we would all want, the possibility of an individual to see themselves as capable. our language hasn't caught up with the changes in our society, many of which have been brought about by technology. certainly, from a medical standpoint, my legs, laser surgery for vision impairment, titanium knees and hip replacements for aging bodies that are allowing people to more fully engage with their abilities, and move beyond the limits that nature has imposed on them -- not to mention social networking platforms allow people to self-identify, to claim their own descriptions of themselves, so they can go align with global groups of their own choosing. so, perhaps technology is revealing more clearly to us now what has always been a truth: that everyone has something rare and powerful to offer our society, and that the human ability to adapt is our greatest asset.

the human ability to adapt, it's an interesting thing, because people have continually wanted to talk to me about overcoming adversity, and i'm going to make an admission: this phrase never sat right with me, and i always felt uneasy trying to answer people's questions about it, and i think i'm starting to figure out why. implicit in this phrase of “overcoming adversity” is the idea that success, or happiness, is about emerging on the other side of a challenging e_perience unscathed or unmarked by the e_perience, as if my successes in life have come about from an ability to sidestep or circumnavigate the presumed pitfalls of a life with prosthetics, or what other people perceive as my disability. but, in fact, we are changed. we are marked, of course, by a challenge, whether physically, emotionally or both. and i'm going to suggest that this is a good thing. adversity isn't an obstacle that we need to get around in order to resume living our life. it's part of our life. and i tend to think of it like my shadow. sometimes i see a lot of it, sometimes there's very little, but it's always with me. and, certainly, i'm not trying to diminish the impact, the weight, of a person's struggle.

there is adversity and challenge in life, and it's all very real and relative to every single person, but the question isn't whether or not you're going to meet adversity, but how you're going to meet it. so, our responsibility is not simply shielding those we care for from adversity, but preparing them to meet it well. and we do a disservice to our kids when we make them feel that they're not equipped to adapt. there's an important difference and distinction between the objective medical fact of my being an amputee and the subjective societal opinion of whether or not i'm disabled. and, truthfully, the only real and consistent disability i've had to confront is the world ever thinking that i could be described by those definitions.

in our desire to protect those we care about by giving them the cold, hard truth about their medical prognosis, or, indeed, a prognosis on the e_pected quality of their life, we have to make sure that we don't put the first brick in a wall that will actually disable someone. perhaps the e_isting model of only looking at what is broken in you and how do we fi_ it, serves to be more disabling to the individual than the pathology itself.

by not treating the wholeness of a person, by not acknowledging their potency, we are creating another ill on top of whatever natural struggle they might have. we are effectively grading someone's worth to our community. so we need to see through the pathology and into the range of human capability. and, most importantly, there's a partnership between those perceived deficiencies and our greatest creative ability. so it's not about devaluing, or negating, these more trying times as something we want to avoid or sweep under the rug, but instead to find those opportunities wrapped in the adversity. so maybe the idea i want to put out there is not so much overcoming adversity as it is opening ourselves up to it, embracing it, grappling with it, to use a wrestling term, maybe even dancing with it. and, perhaps, if we see adversity as natural, consistent and useful, we're less burdened by the presence of it.

this year we celebrate the 200th birthday of charles darwin, and it was 150 years ago, when writing about evolution, that darwin illustrated, i think, a truth about the human character. to paraphrase: it's not the strongest of the species that survives, nor is it the most intelligent that survives; it is the one that is most adaptable to change. conflict is the genesis of creation. from darwin's work, amongst others, we can recognize that the human ability to survive and flourish is driven by the struggle of the human spirit through conflict into transformation. so, again, transformation, adaptation, is our greatest human skill. and, perhaps, until we're tested, we don't know what we're made of. maybe that's what adversity gives us: a sense of self, a sense of our own power. so, we can give ourselves a gift. we can re-imagine adversity as something more than just tough times. maybe we can see it as change. adversity is just change that we haven't adapted ourselves to yet.

i think the greatest adversity that we've created for ourselves is this idea of normalcy. now, who's normal? there's no normal. there's common, there's typical. there's no normal, and would you want to meet that poor, beige person if they e_isted? (laughter) i don't think so. if we can change this paradigm from one of achieving normalcy to one of possibility -- or potency, to be even a little bit more dangerous -- we can release the power of so many more children, and invite them to engage their rare and valuable abilities with the community.

anthropologists tell us that the one thing we as humans have always required of our community members is to be of use, to be able to contribute. there's evidence that neanderthals, 60,000 years ago, carried their elderly and those with serious physical injury, and perhaps it's because the life e_perience of survival of these people proved of value to the community. they didn't view these people as broken and useless; they were seen as rare and valuable.

a few years ago, i was in a food market in the town where i grew up in that red zone in northeastern pennsylvania, and i was standing over a bushel of tomatoes. it was summertime: i had shorts on. i hear this guy, his voice behind me say, “well, if it isn't aimee mullins.” and i turn around, and it's this older man. i have no idea who he is.

and i said, “i'm sorry, sir, have we met? i don't remember meeting you.”

he said, “well, you wouldn't remember meeting me. i mean, when we met i was delivering you from your mother's womb.” (laughter) oh, that guy. and, but of course, actually, it did click.

this man was dr. kean, a man that i had only known about through my mother's stories of that day, because, of course, typical fashion, i arrived late for my birthday by two weeks. and so my mother's prenatal physician had gone on vacation, so the man who delivered me was a complete stranger to my parents. and, because i was born without the fibula bones, and had feet turned in, and a few toes in this foot and a few toes in that, he had to be the bearer -- this stranger had to be the bearer of bad news.

he said to me, “i had to give this prognosis to your parents that you would never walk, and you would never have the kind of mobility that other kids have or any kind of life of independence, and you've been making liar out of me ever since.” (laughter) (applause)

the e_traordinary thing is that he said he had saved newspaper clippings throughout my whole childhood, whether winning a second grade spelling bee, marching with the girl scouts, you know, the halloween parade, winning my college scholarship, or any of my sports victories, and he was using it, and integrating it into teaching resident students, med students from hahnemann medical school and hershey medical school. and he called this part of the course the _ factor, the potential of the human will. no prognosis can account for how powerful this could be as a determinant in the quality of someone's life. and dr. kean went on to tell me, he said, “in my e_perience, unless repeatedly told otherwise, and even if given a modicum of support, if left to their own devices, a child will achieve.”

see, dr. kean made that shift in thinking. he understood that there's a difference between the medical condition and what someone might do with it. and there's been a shift in my thinking over time, in that, if you had asked me at 15 years old, if i would have traded prosthetics for flesh-and-bone legs, i wouldn't have hesitated for a second. i aspired to that kind of normalcy back then. but if you ask me today, i'm not so sure. and it's because of the e_periences i've had with them, not in spite of the e_periences i've had with them. and perhaps this shift in me has happened because i've been e_posed to more people who have opened doors for me than those who have put lids and cast shadows on me.

see, all you really need is one person to show you the epiphany of your own power, and you're off. if you can hand somebody the key to their own power -- the human spirit is so receptive -- if you can do that and open a door for someone at a crucial moment, you are educating them in the best sense. you're teaching them to open doors for themselves. in fact, the e_act meaning of the word “educate” comes from the root word “educe.” it means “to bring forth what is within, to bring out potential.” so again, which potential do we want to bring out?

there was a case study done in 1960s britain, when they were moving from grammar schools to comprehensive schools. it's called the streaming trials. we call it “tracking” here in the states. it's separating students from a, b, c, d and so on. and the “a students” get the tougher curriculum, the best teachers, etc. well, they took, over a three-month period, d-level students, gave them a's, told them they were “a's,” told them they were bright, and at the end of this three-month period, they were performing at a-level.

and, of course, the heartbreaking, flip side of this study, is that they took the “a students” and told them they were “d's.” and that's what happened at the end of that three-month period. those who were still around in school, besides the people who had dropped out. a crucial part of this case study was that the teachers were duped too. the teachers didn't know a switch had been made. they were simply told, “these are the 'a-students,' these are the 'd-students.'” and that's how they went about teaching them and treating them.

so, i think that the only true disability is a crushed spirit, a spirit that's been crushed doesn't have hope, it doesn't see beauty, it no longer has our natural, childlike curiosity and our innate ability to imagine. if instead, we can bolster a human spirit to keep hope, to see beauty in themselves and others, to be curious and imaginative, then we are truly using our power well. when a spirit has those qualities, we are able to create new realities and new ways of being.

i'd like to leave you with a poem by a fourteenth-century persian poet named hafiz that my friend, jacques dembois told me about, and the poem is called “the god who only knows four words”: “every child has known god, not the god of names, not the god of don'ts, but the god who only knows four words and keeps repeating them, saying, 'come dance with me. come, dance with me. come, dance with me.'”

thank you. (applause)

篇7：ted演讲稿精选

in a funny, rapid-fire 4 minutes, ale_is ohanian of reddit tells the real-life fable of one humpback whale's rise to web stardom. the lesson of mister splashy pants is a shoo-in classic for meme-makers and marketers in the facebook age.

这段有趣的4分钟演讲，来自 reddit 网站创始人 ale_is ohanian。他讲了一个座头鲸在网上一夜成名的真实故事。“溅水先生”的故事是脸书时代米姆(小编注：根据《牛津英语词典》，meme被定义为：“文化的基本单位，通过非遗传的方式，特别是模仿而得到传递。”)制造者和传播者共同创造的经典案例。

演讲的开头，ale_is ohanian 介绍了“溅水先生”的故事。“绿色和平”环保组织为了阻止日本的捕鲸行为，在一只鲸鱼体内植入新片，并发起一个为这只座头鲸起名的活动。“绿色和平”组织希望起低调奢华有内涵的名字，但经过 reddit 的宣传和推动，票数最多的却是非常不高大上的“溅水先生”这个名字。经过几番折腾，“绿色和平”接受了这个名字，并且这一行动成功阻止了日本捕鲸活动。

演讲内容节选(ale_ ohanian 从社交网络的角度分析这个事件)

and actually, redditors in the internet community were happy to participate, but they weren't whale lovers. a few of them certainly were. but we're talking about a lot of people who were just really interested and really caught up in this great meme, and in fact someone from greenpeace came back on the site and thanked reddit for its participation. but this wasn't really out of altruism. this was just out of interest in doing something cool.

事实上，reddit 的社区用户们很高兴参与其中，但他们并非是鲸鱼爱好者。当然，他们中的一小部分或许是。我们看到的是一群人积极地去参与到这个米姆(社会活动)中，实际上 “绿色和平”中的人登陆 reddit.com，感谢大家的参与。网友们这么做并非是完全的利他主义。他们只是觉得做这件事很酷。

and this is kind of how the internet works. this is that great big secret. because the internet provides this level playing field. your link is just as good as your link, which is just as good as my link. as long as we have a browser, anyone can get to any website no matter how big a budget you have.

这就是互联网的运作方式。这就是我说的秘密。因为互联网提供的是一个机会均等平台。你分享的链接跟他分享的链接一样有趣，我分享的链接也不赖。只要我们有一个浏览器，不论你的财富几何，你都可以去到想浏览的页面。

the other important thing is that it costs nothing to get that content online now. there are so many great publishing tools that are available, it only takes a few minutes of your time now to actually produce something. and the cost of iteration is so cheap that you might as well give it a go.

另外，从互联网获取内容不需要任何成本。如今，互联网有各种各样的发布工具，你只需要几分钟就可以成为内容的提供者。这种行为的成本非常低，你也可以试试。

and if you do, be genuine about it. be honest. be up front. and one of the great lessons that greenpeace actually learned was that it's okay to lose control. the final message that i want to share with all of you -- that you can do well online. if you want to succeed you've got to be okay to just lose control. thank you.

如果你真的决定试试，那么请真挚、诚实、坦率地去做。“绿色和平”在这个故事中获得的教训是，有时候失控并不一定是坏事。最后我想告诉你们的是——你可以在网络上做得很好。如果你想在网络上成功，你得经得起一点失控。谢谢。

篇8：ted演讲稿精选

try something new for 30 days 小计划帮你实现大目标

a few years ago, i felt like i was stuck in a rut, so i decided to follow in the footsteps of the great american philosopher, morgan spurlock, and try something new for 30 days. the idea is actually pretty simple. think about something you’ve always wanted to add to your life and try it for the ne_t 30 days. it turns out, 30 days is just about the right amount of time to add a new habit or subtract a habit — like watching the news — from your life.

几年前，我感觉对老一套感到枯燥乏味，所以我决定追随伟大的美国哲学家摩根·斯普尔洛克的脚步，尝试做新事情30天。这个想法的确是非常简单。考虑下，你常想在你生命中做的一些事情接下来30天尝试做这些。这就是，30天刚好是这么一段合适的时间去养成一个新的习惯或者改掉一个习惯——例如看新闻——在你生活中。

there’s a few things i learned while doing these 30-day challenges. the first was, instead of the months flying by, forgotten, the time was much more memorable. this was part of a challenge i did to take a picture everyday for a month. and i remember e_actly where i was and what i was doing that day. i also noticed that as i started to do more and harder 30-day challenges, my self-confidence grew. i went from desk-dwelling computer nerd to the kind of guy who bikes to work — for fun. even last year, i ended up hiking up mt. kilimanjaro, the highest mountain in africa. i would never have been that adventurous before i started my 30-day challenges.

当我在30天做这些挑战性事情时，我学到以下一些事。第一件事是，取代了飞逝而过易被遗忘的岁月的是这段时间非常的更加令人难忘。挑战的一部分是要一个月内每天我要去拍摄一张照片。我清楚地记得那一天我所处的位置我都在干什么。我也注意到随着我开始做更多的，更难的30天里具有挑战性的事时，我自信心也增强了。我从一个台式计算机宅男极客变成了一个爱骑自行车去工作的人——为了玩乐。甚至去年，我完成了在非洲最高山峰乞力马扎罗山的远足。在我开始这30天做挑战性的事之前我从来没有这样热爱冒险过。

i also figured out that if you really want something badly enough, you can do anything for 30 days. have you ever wanted to write a novel? every november, tens of thousands of people try to write their own 50,000 word novel from scratch in 30 days. it turns out, all you have to do is write 1,667 words a day for a month. so i did. by the way, the secret is not to go to sleep until you’ve written your words for the day. you might be sleep-deprived, but you’ll finish your novel. now is my book the ne_t great american novel? no. i wrote it in a month. it’s awful. but for the rest of my life, if i meet john hodgman at a ted party, i don’t have to say, “i’m a computer scientist.” no, no, if i want to i can say, “i’m a novelist.”

我也认识到如果你真想一些槽糕透顶的事，你可以在30天里做这些事。你曾想写小说吗?每年11月，数以万计的人们在30天里，从零起点尝试写他们自己的5万字小说。这结果就是，你所要去做的事就是每天写1667个字要写一个月。所以我做到了。顺便说一下，秘密在于除非在一天里你已经写完了1667个字，要不你就甭想睡觉。你可能被剥夺睡眠，但你将会完成你的小说。那么我写的书会是下一部伟大的美国小说吗?不是的。我在一个月内写完它。它看上去太可怕了。但在我的余生，如果我在一个ted聚会上遇见约翰·霍奇曼，我不必开口说，“我是一个电脑科学家。”不，不会的，如果我愿意我可以说，“我是一个小说家。”

(laughter)

(笑声)

so here’s one last thing i’d like to mention. i learned that when i made small, sustainable changes, things i could keep doing, they were more likely to stick. there’s nothing wrong with big, crazy challenges. in fact, they’re a ton of fun. but they’re less likely to stick. when i gave up sugar for 30 days, day 31 looked like this.

我这儿想提的最后一件事。当我做些小的、持续性的变化，我可以不断尝试做的事时，我学到我可以把它们更容易地坚持做下来。这和又大又疯狂的具有挑战性的事情无关。事实上，它们的乐趣无穷。但是，它们就不太可能坚持做下来。当我在30天里拒绝吃糖果，31天后看上去就像这样。

(laughter)

(笑声)

so here’s my question to you: what are you waiting for? i guarantee you the ne_t 30 days are going to pass whether you like it or not, so why not think about something you have always wanted to try and give it a shot for the ne_t 30 days.

所以我给大家提的问题是：大家还在等什么呀?我保准大家在未来的30天定会经历你喜欢或者不喜欢的事，那么为什么不考虑一些你常想做的尝试并在未来30天里试试给自己一个机会。

thanks.

谢谢。

(applause)

(掌声)

篇9：ted演讲稿精选

I was one of the only kids in college who had a reason to go to the P.O. bo_ at the end of the day, and that was mainly because my mother has never believed in email, in Facebook, in te_ting or cell phones in general. And so while other kids were BBM-ing their parents, I was literally waiting by the mailbo_ to get a letter from home to see how the weekend had gone, which was a little frustrating when Grandma was in the hospital, but I was just looking for some sort of scribble, some unkempt cursive from my mother.

And so when I moved to New York City after college and got completely sucker-punched in the face by depression, I did the only thing I could think of at the time. I wrote those same kinds of letters that my mother had written me for strangers, and tucked them all throughout the city, dozens and dozens of them. I left them everywhere, in cafes and in libraries, at the U.N., everywhere. I blogged about those letters and the days when they were necessary, and I posed a kind of crazy promise to the Internet: that if you asked me for a hand-written letter, I would write you one, no questions asked. Overnight, my inbo_ morphed into this harbor of heartbreak -- a single mother in Sacramento, a girl being bullied in rural Kansas, all asking me, a 22-year-old girl who barely even knew her own coffee order, to write them a love letter and give them a reason to wait by the mailbo_.

Well, today I fuel a global organization that is fueled by those trips to the mailbo_, fueled by the ways in which we can harness social media like never before to write and mail strangers letters when they need them most, but most of all, fueled by crates of mail like this one, my trusty mail crate, filled with the scriptings of ordinary people, strangers writing letters to other strangers not because they're ever going to meet and laugh over a cup of coffee, but because they have found one another by way of letter-writing.

But, you know, the thing that always gets me about these letters is that most of them have been written by people that have never known themselves loved on a piece of paper. They could not tell you about the ink of their own love letters. They're the ones from my generation, the ones of us that have grown up into a world where everything is paperless, and where some of our best conversations have happened upon a screen. We have learned to diary our pain onto Facebook, and we speak swiftly in 140 characters or less.

But what if it's not about efficiency this time? I was on the subway yesterday with this mail crate, which is a conversation starter, let me tell you. If you ever need one, just carry one of these. (Laughter) And a man just stared at me, and he was like, “Well, why don't you use the Internet?” And I thought, “Well, sir, I am not a strategist, nor am I specialist. I am merely a storyteller.” And so I could tell you about a woman whose husband has just come home from Afghanistan, and she is having a hard time unearthing this thing called conversation, and so she tucks love letters throughout the house as a way to say, “Come back to me. Find me when you can.” Or a girl who decides that she is going to leave love letters around her campus in Dubuque, Iowa, only to find her efforts ripple-effected the ne_t day when she walks out onto the quad and finds love letters hanging from the trees, tucked in the bushes and the benches. Or the man who decides that he is going to take his life, uses Facebook as a way to say goodbye to friends and family. Well, tonight he sleeps safely with a stack of letters just like this one tucked beneath his pillow, scripted by strangers who were there for him when.

These are the kinds of stories that convinced me that letter-writing will never again need to flip back her hair and talk about efficiency, because she is an art form now, all the parts of her, the signing, the scripting, the mailing, the doodles in the margins. The mere fact that somebody would even just sit down, pull out a piece of paper and think about someone the whole way through, with an intention that is so much harder to unearth when the browser is up and the iPhone is pinging and we've got si_ conversations rolling in at once, that is an art form that does not fall down to the Goliath of “get faster,” no matter how many social networks we might join. We still clutch close these letters to our chest, to the words that speak louder than loud, when we turn pages into palettes to say the things that we have needed to say, the words that we have needed to write, to sisters and brothers and even to strangers, for far too long. Thank you. (Applause) (Applause)

篇10：ted演讲稿

TED: 怎样从错误中学习

Diana Laugenberg: How to learn From mistakes

讲者分享了其多年从教中所认识到的一从错误中学习的观念“允许孩子失败，把失败视为学习的一部分”，以及从教育实践中学到的三件事：“1.体验学习的过程 2.倾听学生的声音 3.接纳错误的失败。”

TED演讲文本：

0:15

I have been teaching for a long time, and in doing so have acquired a body of knowledge aboutkids and learning that I really wish more people would understand about the potential ofstudents. In 1931, my grandmother -- bottom left for you guys over here -- graduated from theeighth grade. She went to school to get the information because that's where the informationlived. It was in the books; it was inside the teacher's head; and she needed to go there to getthe information, because that's how you learned. Fast-forward a generation: this is the one-roomschoolhouse, Oak Grove, where my father went to a one-room schoolhouse. And he again hadto travel to the school to get the information from the teacher, stored it in the only portablememory he has, which is inside his own head, and take it with him, because that is howinformation was being transported from teacher to student and then used in the world. When Iwas a kid, we had a set of encyclopedias at my house. It was purchased the year I was born,and it was extraordinary, because I did not have to wait to go to the library to get to theinformation. The information was inside my house and it was awesome. This was different thaneither generation had experienced before, and it changed the way I interacted with informationeven at just a small level. But the information was closer to me. I could get access to it.

1:34

In the time that passes between when I was a kid in high school and when I started teaching,we really see the advent of the Internet. Right about the time that the Internet gets going as aneducational tool, I take off from Wisconsin and move to Kansas, small town Kansas, where Ihad an opportunity to teach in a lovely, small-town, rural Kansas school district, where I wasteaching my favorite subject, American government. My first year -- super gung-ho -- going toteach American government, loved the political system. Kids in the 12th grade: not exactly allthat enthusiastic about the American government system. Year two: learned a few things -- hadto change my tactic. And I put in front of them an authentic experience that allowed them tolearn for themselves. I didn't tell them what to do or how to do it. I posed a problem in front ofthem, which was to put on an election forum for their own community.

2:27

They produced flyers. They called offices. They checked schedules. They were meeting withsecretaries. They produced an election forum booklet for the entire town to learn more abouttheir candidates. They invited everyone into the school for an evening of conversation aboutgovernment and politics and whether or not the streets were done well, and really had thisrobust experiential learning. The older teachers -- more experienced -- looked at me and went,

“Oh, there she is. That's so cute. She's trying to get that done.” (Laughter)

“She doesn't knowwhat she's in for.” But I knew that the kids would show up, and I believed it, and I told themevery week what I expected out of them. And that night, all 90 kids -- dressed appropriately,doing their job, owning it. I had to just sit and watch. It was theirs. It was experiential. It wasauthentic. It meant something to them. And they will step up.