当前位置：首页 > 实用文档 > 其他范文> 新手练笔GRE写作需注意这5种易错扣分问题

新手练笔GRE写作需注意这5种易错扣分问题

时间：2023-02-08 07:43:27 其他范文收藏本文下载本文

新手练笔GRE写作需注意这5种易错扣分问题（合集6篇）由网友“一颗大番茄”投稿提供，这次小编在这里给大家整理过的新手练笔GRE写作需注意这5种易错扣分问题，供大家阅读参考。

篇1：新手练笔GRE写作需注意这5种易错扣分问题

【备考提升】新手练笔GRE写作需注意这5种易错扣分问题

GRE作文丢分点：逻辑问题

大体上来说，考生们的逻辑问题是最多的。逻辑问题有三种，通篇逻辑，段落之间，段落之中。

其实这可能和我们高中初中的英语教育有关系，大家都很喜欢一条一条摆原因。Firstly， secondly...然后后面至于这个ly后面是什么就不管了，一顿胡扯。也不管这段落与段落之间的衔接是否自然，反正都有什么ly给打头阵。

事实上，中西方的思维总是存在差异，很多时候看管老师们都不懂考生在说什么。考官很困惑，这个例子和这个有关系吗?为什么前面在说A，后面突然B了?

GRE作文丢分点：结构混乱

写GRE作文要记住一点，文章是一个整体，所以开篇结尾和中部内容都是应该有关联的。也就是说，在开头提到的，文中应该有展开，同时在结尾有总结。中文作文里也要求行文流畅，所以文章至少要做到逻辑通顺。

GRE作文丢分点：立场模糊

很多同学都很喜欢写中立观点“A不错，但不够好”，这虽然看起来很客观，但实际上这种新GRE写作对逻辑的要求非常高，要怎样去组织语言，组织相应的论据论点，非常考验人。

有同学想说A事件要瑕疵互见，但是写着写着就乱七八糟，东一块西一块，不知道在讲点什么了。更有厉害的索性冗长的来词，讲了个空话。所以建议刚上手的同学，还是选择一边倒，站定脚跟不放松。即便是真的要写中立观点，实际上也都在A和B之间有所偏好。

GRE作文丢分点：胡乱举例

现在很多老师和教材都会要求练写作的时候先写提纲。于是考生们就只写一个观点，然后后面的例子乱用，或者根本没有弄清楚什么是例子。事实上，这种展开，可以是实例，也可以是虚拟的假设。实例中往往分自己的经验和他人的经验。那么怎样的例子有说服力呢?

一般来说是：名人名事(知名度大)>众人众事(样本大)>自己经历(体会深)>他人经历。假设往往不够有说服力，因为很难涉及到每一个变量。但是假设在有的时候可以行得通，就是在很难说清楚步骤和因果关系的时候，用一个假设场景来推导会让文章变得浅显易懂。

所以建议，在刚开始上手写GRE作文的时候，先不要给自己30分钟的压力，先列出提纲(10分钟)，再用30分钟去写，看能写多少。

GRE作文丢分点：观点跑题

记住你的举例一定要死死扣住你的新GRE作文观点，不要是和观点打擦边球的。

GRE考试中例子一定要从论点出发，再回到论点。不要将你的论点发散，后果很可能就是越写越跑题。所以每次写好一篇文章，都看看，论据里的key words是不是和论点里的key words一样，论点里的key words又是不是和题目里的key words一样。你的key words 可以比大题里的key words更加narrow，但是千万不要更加广泛。

有关GRE考试写作的易丢分点就为大家介绍到这里，希望各位考生在复习时特别注意这些问题，认真对待GRE写作。

GRE作文典型句摘录

是非问题句子:

1. Whereas other societies look to the past for guidance, we cast our nets forward.

2. It is the belief in a brighter future that gives us optimism.

3. The job of the parents is to give the children every opportunity while they are growing up and then get out of their way.

4. When half the population goes to college, one cannot expect the colleges to maintain the same standards as in countries where only the elite attend.

5. Just as not every Japanese is hardworking and deferential to superiors,not every Chinese is devoted to family, not every American is ambitious or patriotic—or even unsophisticated.

6. No one could seriously think that anyone who grows up poor, lives in a bad neighborhood, and attends an inferior school has an opportunity equal to that of someone more favored.

7. Current wisdom says that if you want a successful product, you need first to perform detailed market analysis, making sure that there are plenty of people who need the new product and that you entry into the market will be able to gain a significant share of that market.

8. The evidence suggests that, on balance, people today tend to concern themselves with only practical matters that are related to their life.

9. At first glance, it would seem that increased bureaucracy creates obstacles between the citizens and those who govern, thereby separating the two groups. Closer examination reveals, however, that in many ways government bureaucracy actually bridges the gap, and that new technologies now allow for ways around the gap.

10. There is no doubt that hard work contributes to success, yet a person can work awfully hard and still achieve very little.

逻辑问题句子:

1. The mere fact that ticket sales in recent years for screenplay-based movies have exceeded those for book-based movies is insufficient evidence to conclude that writing screenplays now provides greater financial opportunity for writers.

2. The argument fails to rule out the possibility that a writer engages in both types of writing as well as other types.

3. The argument simply equates success with movie ticket sales, which is unwarranted.

4. Moreover, the author provides no evidence that the realism of color photography is the reason for its predominance.

5. This assumption presents a false dilemma, since the two media are not necessarily mutually exclusive alternatives.

6. The argument ignores the factors—such as initiative, creativity, technical skills, and business judgment—that may be more important than the choice of medium in determining success in photography.

7. While this may be true in some cases, it is equally possible that only companies with products that are already best-sellers can afford the higher ad rates that popular shows demand.

8. The author’s conclusion that switching to incineration would be more salutary for public health would be seriously undermined.

9. Consequently, unless the author can demonstrate that the city will incur expenses that are not covered by the increased revenues from these projects, the author’s concern about these issues is unfounded.

10. The author’s proposal is inconsistent with the author’s conclusion about the consequences of adopting an ethics code.

GRE考试范文：名人观点

When famous people give their opinions， many people listen. Should we pay attention to those remarks?

When Tom Cruise once appeared in a TV program， he was too excited so he jumped up and down the couch. Later “jump the couch” was adopted in the American dictionary for slang. This is a bit exaggerating， but it definitely reflects the fact that when famous people give their opinions， many people listen. But， should we pay attention to these remarks or actions?

Firstly， famous people are “famous”， for they have one or few aspects that exceed common people. Like Albert Einstein once said， “I think and think for months， for years， ninety-nine times the conclusion false， but the hundredth time I am right.” As a brilliant scientist， he speaks of the right attitudes towards science and inspires countless people to fight for the truth. Hollywood actors or actresses， they may talk about their dressing styles or skin cares on magazine. These are all advice that we might as well take， for real life is not just serious academic things but also the satisfaction of living.

But the point is that， celebrities are not perfect role models for the public. Once I heard a story about Einstein， saying that he nearly got into the water when he once harassed a young lady and got refused when they were in a boat in a park. Is Einstein evil somehow? No! He's just being human. Then is it wrong to harass ladies? Yes. But all humans make mistakes. Celebrities are experts in certain areas but not all. In some other fields， they should even learn from us.

Generally， there are two extremes when talking about celebrities： the public are either too critical or too superstitious. Objectively， both of the attitudes are unnecessary. As a Chinese saying which generalizes this situation the best goes： to take in the good， while to get rid of the bad.

篇2：新手练笔GRE写作需注意易错扣分问题

新手练笔GRE写作需注意这5种易错扣分问题

GRE作文丢分点：逻辑问题

大体上来说，考生们的逻辑问题是最多的。逻辑问题有三种，通篇逻辑，段落之间，段落之中。

GRE作文丢分点：结构混乱

GRE作文丢分点：立场模糊

有同学想说A事件要瑕疵互见，但是写着写着就乱七八糟，东一块西一块，不知道在讲点什么了。更有厉害的索性冗长的2000来词，讲了个空话。所以建议刚上手的同学，还是选择一边倒，站定脚跟不放松。即便是真的要写中立观点，实际上也都在A和B之间有所偏好。

GRE作文丢分点：胡乱举例

所以建议，在刚开始上手写GRE作文的时候，先不要给自己30分钟的压力，先列出提纲(10分钟)，再用30分钟去写，看能写多少。

GRE作文丢分点：观点跑题

记住你的举例一定要死死扣住你的新GRE作文观点，不要是和观点打擦边球的。

GRE写作备考三阶段

GRE考试写作备考第一阶段：重视题库

Arg题库如何准备?

每个题目都要看，把逻辑错误找出来，提取关键词或者信号词。比如调查类错误就是找survey，看到nationwide就想到fa，这要成为一种习惯，找的时间长了，自然形成一种感觉。这个阶段要开始写arg，不计时间的写，能写多少写多少，写的越多越好。

Issue题库的准备

按照传统分类模式可以分成社会、科技、行为、教育、历史、媒体、艺术、国际化等几个大类。但是在后期复习中这样的分类方式无法满足高效复习的需求。所以，一开始准备issue题库的时候，需要对题库进行在分类。

找出每个大类之间的横向关系。比如科技在教育、社会、行为、历史中的应用和影响等等。这样对每个题目采取二位定位，题目的核心点就会更加清晰，写起来方向也多。题库梳理的时间为7~10天，需要完成度任务还是很多的。

GRE考试写作备考第二阶段：规划攻击顺序

arg的第二阶段

arg的第二阶段核心是规划攻击顺序。经典的让步攻击必须掌握，但这种方法存在一些限制，因为论据和论据之间的逻辑关系可以分为两种，递推和并列。递推型的数据结构用让步发当然是非常完美。但是论据是并列关系的话，让步法就会显得松散。

在第二阶段中，一定要做好的事情就是分析论据结构。如果是并列型论据，我们需要找到论据支撑的核心假设，然后弱化论据和核心假设之间的logic link，使得核心假设无法成立。攻击语言不要太过强硬，多用might这样的词，但是逻辑要强大。

如何分辨论据结构?如果论据之间存在推理关系，那就是递推型。如果只是单纯的事实堆砌，甚至主语都是一样的，那么自然就是并列型。

Arg第二阶段要开始计时练笔了，规定45分钟写到450~600词。

Issue第二阶段

Issue第二阶段中，需要挖掘题目的隐含逻辑。比如说竞争就要想到合作，说历史就要想到现在和未来等等。其次，要了解issue的一个核心是推理而不是堆砌。中国学生写issue分数一般的原因就是很喜欢举例子证明，慢慢的就成了阐释what的过程，但是issue要求我们对概念加以阐释和推理，用逻辑手法证明我们的观点，也就是需要解释why的过程。

拿竞争举例，我们写的方向是竞争促进种群进步，一个例子;竞争促进企业发展，一个例子;不良竞争不利于社会发展，一个例子;所以要适度竞争。这样是一直在说what，而高分的文章会这样竞争的本质源于物质稀缺性，物种为了生存延续不得不去争抢稀缺的物质，这个过程产生竞争。得到物质的个体存活下来，能力不足没有得到的个体就被淘汰，这就是竞争刺激优胜劣汰。

这样的一个推理过程就是为什么竞争是好的，这个推理过程是ets想看到的。再比如“诺贝尔奖是给少数人的，这样不利于科学发展”，这个题目本质是资源分配中的马太效应，不揭示这个概念，文章只能写得很表面。

第二阶段准备issue提纲，最好配上素材大全，可以找一些核心概念引导。这时候需要开始练笔了45分钟600字甚至更多。写提纲的时候要深度剖析一下。

GRE考试写作备考第三阶段：练笔过程

对于arg和issue都是，每天看写过的提纲。用模考软件练笔，争取27分钟写到400+，找一些厉害的人批改也会很促进成长。自己修改也是可以的，但是要注意对句子进行润色和再修饰。

GRE考试中写作不同于数学部分，可以通过大量的习题练习，好的写作水平在于平时的日积月累，所以考生们一定要多多积累好的句子和素材，这样才能写出好的文章

GRE写作的字数要求

字数并不是越多越好。试想，改卷人批上那么多试卷，头都大了，每一份都想尽快看完，根本不可能仔细研读，写了太多反而招致反感。但语言思辩一定要清晰，这是我看范文得出的结论。要抓住改卷人的好奇心、注意力，让他跟着你走，吸引他迫切想知道你下面会说什么。所以这就要求语言一定要流畅。我自己有个毛病不知道是否也有人一样，就是思维跳远，往往造成不必要的省略和重复。因为下笔之前总是要先构思一下句子，想得越多越导致条约，如此会使文章读起来不连贯。我的朋友们看我写的作文都有这样的看法。这个也没什么好办法解决，只能说自己多熟练好文章的表达，培养语感，脱口而出啦。

一般来说，400字差不多了。另外，这里要提醒大家的是，不能光在机器上练，也得动动手，老是不写字手很生涩的。而且就我自己而言，打字的速度和写字的速度差别很大，特别是英文。

虽然官方没有给定新GRE作文字数要求，但是考生复

篇3：GRE写作易错扣分问题

大体上来说，同学们的逻辑问题是最多的。逻辑问题有三种，通篇逻辑，段落之间，段落之中。其实这可能和我们高中初中的英语教育有关系，大家都很喜欢一条一条摆原因。Firstly, secondly...然后后面至于这个ly后面是什么就不管了，一顿胡扯。也不管这段落与段落之间的衔接是否自然，反正都有什么ly给打头阵。

事实上，中西方的思维总是存在差异，很多时候考官都不懂考生在说什么。考官很困惑，这个例子和这个有关系吗?为什么前面在说A，后面突然B了?和结论什么关系?要记住一点，GRE作文文章是一个整体，你的开篇结尾和中部内容都是应该有关联的。也就是说，在开头提到的，文中应该有展开，同时在结尾有总结。中文里不也要求行文流畅么，所以GRE作文想要保分，至少要保证文章的整体逻辑是通顺的。

篇4：GRE写作易错扣分问题

段落之间的连接出问题也是比较容易导致作文扣分的因素之一。会出现这种错误一般都是因为大家对连接词的运用存在问题。比如However, thus, therefore之类的词汇其实很重要，因为他们决定了上下文之间的关系。而许多同学用错了连接词，就会让文章读起来很奇怪，比如上下两段之间完全不是转折的关系，考生却用了however，这就会让人觉得有些奇怪了。有些同学干脆就是上下文之间完全没有逻辑联系，然后强行把两个单句凑在了一起。总而言之，一篇文章无论是段落内的上下句，还是两个邻接的段落之间，都是需要有连接词来体现其逻辑关系的。考生想要取得GRE写作满分则一定要注意在这方面尽可能做好。

GRE写作满分范文赏析

Hospital?statistics?regarding?people?who?go?to?the?emergency?room?after?roller-skating?accidents?indicate?the?need?for?more?protective?equipment.??Within?this?group?of?people,?75?percent?of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protective?clothing?(helmets,?knee?pads,?etc.)?or?any?light-reflecting?material?(clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads,?etc.).??Clearly,?these?statistics?indicate?that?by?investing?in?high-quality?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment,?roller?skaters?will?greatly?reduce?their?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident.??

Although?the?argument?stated?above?discusses?the?importance?of?safety?equipment?as?significant?part?of?avoiding?injury,?the?statistics?quoted?are?vague?and?inconclusive.??Simply?because?75?percent?of?the?people?involved?in?roller-skating?accidents?are?not?wearing?the?stated?equipment?does?not?automatically?implicate?the?lack?of?equipment?as?the?cause?of?injury.??The?term?“accidents”?may?imply?a?great?variety?of?injuries.??The?types?of?injuries?one?could?incur?by?not?wearing?the?types?of?equipment?stated?above?are?minor?head?injuries;?skin?abrasions?or?possibly?bone?fracture?of?a?select?few?areas?such?as?knees,?elbows,?hands,?etc.?(which?are?in?fact?most?vulnerable?to?this?sport);?and/or?injuries?due?to?practising?the?sport?during?low?light?times?of?the?day.??During?any?physically?demanding?activity?or?sport?people?are?subjected?to?a?wide?variety?of?injuries?which?cannot?be?avoided?with?protective?clothing?or light-reflective?materials.??These?injuries?include?inner?trauma?(e.g.,?heart-attack);?exhaustion;?strained?muscles,?ligaments,?or?tendons;?etc.??Perhaps?the?numbers?and?percentages?of?people?injured?during?roller-skating,?even?without?protective?equipment,?would?decrease?greatly?if?people?participating?in?the?sport?had?proper?training,?good?physical?health,?warm-up?properly?before?beginning?(stretching),?as?well?as?take?other?measures?to?prevent?possible?injury,?such?as?common-sense,?by?refraining?from?performing?the?activity?after?proper?lighting?has?ceased?and?knowing?your?personal?limitations?as?an?individual?and?athlete.??The?statistics?used?in?the?above?reasoning?are?lacking?in?proper?direction?considering?their?assertions?and?therefore?must?be?further?examined?and?modified?so?that?proper?conclusions?can?be?reached.

Commentary??

This?adequate?response?targets?the?argument's?vague?and?inconclusive?“statistics.”??The?essay?identifies?and?critiques?the?illogical?reasoning?that?results?from?the?misguided?use?of?the?argument's?statistics:??

--?that?non-use?of?equipment?may?be?“automatically”?assumed?to?be?the????cause?of?injury?

--?that?“accidents”?may?refer?to?minor?injuries?

--?that?injuries?may?result?from?other?causes?--?skating?in?the?dark,????failure?to?train?or?warm-up?properly,?failure?to?recognize?one's????physical?limitations??

The?writer?competently?grasps?the?weaknesses?of?the?argument.??The?ideas?are?clear?and?connected,?but?the?response?lacks?transitional?phrases.??Development,?too,?is?only?adequate.??

Control?of?language?is?better?than?adequate.??The?writer?achieves?both?control?and?clarity?and?ably?conforms?to?the?conventions?of?written?English.??Overall,?though,?this?4?response?lacks?the?more?thorough?development?that?would?warrant?a?score?of?5.

GRE写作高分范文：教育的意义

GRE写作范文：

Education developed from the human struggle for survival and enlightenment. It may be formal or informal. Informal education refers to the general social process by which human beings acquire the knowledge and skills needed to function in their culture. Formal education refers to the process by which teachers instruct students in courses of study within institutions.

The proper aim of education is to promote significant learning. Significant learning entails development. Development means successively asking broader and deeper questions of the relationship between oneself and the world.

GRE

篇5：GRE写作易错扣分问题

现在很多考生练GRE写作的时候都会先写提纲，这种做法本身是挺好的，但有些同学只写一个观点，然后后面的例子乱用，或者根本没有弄清楚什么是例子。事实上，这种展开，可以是实例，也可以是虚拟的假设。实例中往往分自己的经验和他人的经验。那么怎样的例子有说服力呢?记住你的举例一定要死死扣住你的GRE作文观点，不要是和观点打擦边球的。比如小编之前看到过的一篇GRE作文，大观点是电脑对学生来说是有益的，小观点是可以查到很多资料，然后例子是可以用google查到很多资料，很快捷。这样的写法乍一看没有问题，但实际上问题大了，用goole查到很多资料，是因为电脑还是internet?这很容易就偏题了，变成internet 对学生来说是有益的。例子一定要从论点出发，再回到论点。不要将你的论点发散，否则后果很可能就是越写越跑题。所以小编建议大家每次写好一篇文章，都检查一下论据里的key words是不是和论点里的key words 一样，论点里的key words又是不是和题目里的key words一样。你的key words 可以比大题里的key words更加narrow，但是千万不要更加广泛。

篇6：GRE写作常见易错扣分问题

记住你的举例一定要死死扣住你的GRE作文观点，不要是和观点打擦边球的。

例子一定要从论点出发，再回到论点。不要将你的论点发散，后果很可能就是越写越跑题。所以每次写好一篇文章，都看看，论据里的 key words 是不是和论点里的 key words 一样，论点里的 key words 又是不是和题目里的key words一样。你的 key words 可以比大题里的 key words 更加narrow，但是千万不要更加广泛。

GRE写作高分范文：批判性思维

GRE写作范文：

Too much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.

I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so. To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think most people would reject that.

Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.

Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life

without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?

What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.

Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hosptal, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to

第二段：

(概述科技的两面性)Technology has helped, and it has hurt. (具体讨论科技的贡献)Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. (具体讨论科技的危害)But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. (表明已考虑到科技的危害，但是依然坚持自己立场)And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.

第三段：

(提出反方的立场)Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. (通过具体论据反驳反方的观点)But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?

第四段：

(在第三段驳论的基础上进一步立论)What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.

第五段：

Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. (指出支持观点存在的一点不足)But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. (解决方案)We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hospital, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.

gre满分作文重点：Critical Thinking.当然，提高critical thinking能力的同时，也很有必要包装语言。

GRE写作：短期内怎样提高

Argument句型

开头

In this analysis, the arguer claims that …should …To substantiate the conclusion, the arguer cites the example of …where …In addition, the arguer assumes that …This argument is unconvincing for several critical flaws.

正文：

For instance …since …what’s more …etc.

and how well it represented the public opinions..

The sample of the survey is not representative.

(样本太小)

the sample is too small to...

(光数字没比例)

the ratio of four to six

there is only figures but no proportion of the survey 还是ratio?

Insufficient Sample

If the [respondents] only stand for a tiny proportion of the whole [group], we should not be so sure about the conclusion that [the whole group…]

The arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization.

It was only carried out in Sun City, but the arguer applies its result to all the company’s markets while doesn’t show us whether Sun City is a representative market of the whole markets.

有的病人会对抗生素过敏

the arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization. Even if the maintenance of the airline has been improved as a result of sending its mechanics to the Seminar, which is, of course, an unwarranted assumption, it does not follow that就算怎样，也不怎样

The survey is based on two isolated examples. The arguer should survey more hospitals of both types.

循环假设

The arguer commits a fallacy of begging the question in assuming that …

结尾：

other possible causes of the …

To conclude, this argument is not persuasive as it stands.

GRE