GRE作文argument逻辑攻击点有哪些(（通用21篇））由网友“脫北者”投稿提供，下面是小编精心整理的GRE作文argument逻辑攻击点有哪些，希望能够帮助到大家。
篇1：GRE作文argument逻辑攻击点有哪些
“Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook.”
The quotation is certainly correct, insofar as it describes at least an element of wisdom. In other words, I do agree with the proposition, subject to the proviso that the achievement of wisdom may well also involve other traits or attributes.
Having qualified my answer somewhat, I must endorse the principles put forth in the quotation. Overlooking -- or, perhaps, forgetting -- is a crucial skill one needs to master in order to navigate the often-treacherous paths of life without undue torment. From my own experience, and from observations of friends, family members and business associates, I am well aware of the pitfalls which await those who fail to overlook the petty, the unnecessary and the irrelevant.
In modern America, as it happens, the importance of overlooking is probably greater than ever before. Even a person trying to lead a quiet, simple life encounters an endless stream of annoyances, errors and petty demands such as paperwork, filing numbers and taxes; long lines at the bank; exponentially aggravating traffic jams and sullen, uncooperative coworkers and neighbors. Those of us who cannot overlook such annoyances will invariably succumb to self-defeating dismay.
The ability to overlook also reflects a healthy sense of proportion and priorities. The wise “overlooker” will ignore his or her spouse's failings after making a considered judgment that these are outweighed, in the long run, by greater and more significant strengths. for example, what wise or reasonable person would destroy a marriage solely because an otherwise faithful, kind, generous, intelligent and prosperous partner occasionally tosses socks on the floor?
An elderly aunt of mine makes a striking example. Long widowed, she now spends her days sitting in her apartment, carping endlessly about the many relatives who have slighted her. Nobody calls enough. Nobody pays her any atention. Nobody cares, she says.
And, indeed, why should they? Who wants to visit with someone, elderly or otherwise, who does nothing but complain, find fault and scour for slights? Were she wiser, perhaps she would ignore or even suppress her interminable grievances and take more interest in the world at large, including the very individuals whose attention she purportedly craves.
The paradigm of overlooking applies with equal force in the worlds of business and politics. Look at Richard Nixon: a brilliant, often original thinker, he was nonetheless continually obsessed with minutiae and the unimportant. On some level, I'm sure, he himself realized the dramatic impact of such a glaring character flaw; when the situation was long past salvaging, he exhorted his staff and friends to “Never be petty,” a dictum he honored far more in the breach than in the observance.
More prosaically, in business and everyday life, it is indeed the wise person who overlooks or ignores a vast amount. Why come home every day nurturing a grudge? Why spend time grappling with activities, people or attitudes which bring nothing but pain and torment? Still, most of us do, at least somewhat, and find ourselves far diminished for it.
In sum, I think it's safe to say that much in this world merits not even a cursory examination, and those among us are wiser and happier who can successfully budget their time and energy in order to avoid negativity.
Comments:
This is a thoughtful, well-articulated analysis of the issue.
The response opens with a clear endorsement of the stated claim, along with an acknowledgement that wisdom involves additional traits. The writer then begins building an argument that modern life is so full of “petty annoyances” that it would be “self-defeating” to pay much attention to them. Using, first, examples that illustrate the trivial demands encountered everyday (e.g., paperwork, traffic jams), the analysis moves on to personal types of experiences (a partner annoying habits; an aunt self-pity) and then to politics, where, the writer implies, Nixon met his political demise at least partly because of his obsession with “minutiae and the unimportant.” The examples clearly support the writer position and lead effectively to the concluding observation about learning to “budget” our time and energy to avoid the negative aspects of life.
In several places, the skillful use of questions helps move the analysis along. And throughout, the skillful use of sentence variety and precise vocabulary combine to convey meaning effectively, as in this excerpt: “when the situation was long past salvaging, he [Nixon] exhorted his staff and friends to a dictum he honored far more in the breach than in the observance.” This kind of insightful, articulate analysis merits a score of 6.
篇2：GRE作文argument逻辑攻击点有哪些
The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a local newspaper.
“Five years ago, we residents of Morganton voted to keep the publicly owned piece of land known as Scott Woods in a natural, undeveloped state. Our thinking was that, if no shopping centers or houses were built there, Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as a natural parkland. But now that our town planning committee wants to purchase the land and build a school there, we should reconsider this issue. If the land becomes a school site, no shopping centers or houses can be built there, and substantial acreage would probably be devoted to athletic fields. There would be no better use of land in our community than this, since a large majority of our children participate in sports, and Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as natural parkland.”
Since the residents are changing the original statement that complies with the conditions of what an undeveloped site is, it is their responsibility to make sure that certain restrictions are followed. According to the definition of undeveloped land, keeping the natural elements and avoiding the tearing down of this elements is an issue to consider even if it is a school built on the site.
Even though the residents originally wanted to keep the property undeveloped and unbuilt, the fact that they emphasize that this area will subtantially be devoted to athletic fields, strongly supports the idea of the residents using the land for similar activities than that of the public parkland, . Moreover, the fact that the residents mentioned the community as being one where children will be the main participants of this area is persuasive enough to make this argument a strong one.
Comments:
This response is seriously flawed. The first paragraph obliquely addresses the argument made in the topic, but stops short of logical analysis. The second paragraph agrees with the argument and supports its assumptions. In essence, the writer exhibits an uncritical acceptance of the argument.
Aside from a few minor errors, the writer has control over syntax, grammar, and the conventions of standard written English. This response, though, warrants a score of 2, because it offers no discernible analysis of the logic of the argument.
GRE作文
篇3：GRE作文ARGU逻辑攻击点
GRE作文ARGU逻辑攻击点
GRE作文argument逻辑攻击点有哪些?
首先，小编为大家介绍一些在argument作文题目中比较常见的标志性逻辑漏洞。假如大家在读完题目第一时间没有发现逻辑问题，那么考虑一下这些逻辑漏洞可能会为大家带来不少写作灵感。
基本常识类漏洞
虽然GRE考试本身出于公平的原则并没有对各类学科的高深专业知识提出要求，但考生还是需要具备一定的相关基础常识，比如GRE考试中经常涉及的社会、文化、经济、科技等常见主题的基本概念，都应该有所了解。因为GRE作文中，常常会出现一些涉及这些基本知识的逻辑漏洞。如果考生能够对这些知识有所了解，就能在文章题目中发现更多问题。
绝对性用词错误
如果大家读过一些专业性较强的原版杂志报纸，比如《纽约时报》、《华尔街日报》或《经济学人》，就会发现其中很多文章都具备GRE作文考试最喜欢的特质：思考全面，观点平衡，有理有据。极端的观点和结论在GRE作文中鲜少有正确的时候，也往往会是最主要的攻击论点。因此，如果考生在题目的结论中看到了诸如“must”或者“undoubtedly”之类的用词，那么这就是极端结论的最好证明。
模糊表述问题
在GRE写作的题目中，诸如 “few”, “many”, “more”, “less”, and “some”之类的用词常可以看到，这些词虽然在一定程度上具备数字含义，本身却并无法表达出具体的数字，可以说是含义相对模糊不清的用词。如果题目中的论述，特别是涉及数据的部分是建立在这些模糊表达上而得出的结论，那么这个论述本身就存在问题，常常能成为可攻击的逻辑漏洞。
错误推论漏洞
有些题目，常会根据一个较小的例子来得出一个很大的结论。这种以小见大的做法看似很好，但其实常常存在问题。比如一类事物中的A,B,C可能具备一些特性，能够概括出某个共同的结论，但这结论并不一定就能适用于该类事物中的所有不同个体，而这种错误的一概而论，也可以成为考生论述中的突破口。
比较对象不当扩展
有时候，作文题目中会首先列出事物A的前提和结论，并根据A和事物B的相近性，把前提和结论套用到事物B上，这样就往往会产生不恰当的比较，从而形成逻辑上的问题，举例来说：曾看到过一篇例文，讲述人和狗的肥胖问题，把人的肥胖原因和新城代谢等因此直接套用到狗的身上然后得出结论，这就是一种不恰当的比较。
GRE写作挑攻击点要分清主次
如上文所说，其实很多时候一篇argument题目素材里，存在的逻辑漏洞往往不止一处，对于一些写作驳论文经验丰富的考生来说，有些题目甚至一眼望去就是千疮百孔的。但这并不代表大家随便抓住一点就可以写出很有说服力的文章。学会区分逻辑漏洞的主要和次要，集中精力从主要漏洞入手进行写作才能让文章更有说服力。
总而言之，想要写好GRE写作的ARGUMENT驳论文还是需要一定技巧和方法的。假如大家在面对ARGUMENT时还处于找不到逻辑漏洞无从驳起的阶段，那么上文中提到的这些内容，相信会给大家带来一些提示和帮助。
GRE写作：多进行题目练习
很多同学在备考GRE作文的时候，之所以对“高频”情有独钟，实际上思想根源还是希望能减少工作量，说得通俗一点，也就是还是抱有“投机取巧”的心理。这些同学的想法往往是：GRE官方的题库给出的200多道题太多了，看高频可以减低我的工作量(也就是不需要把200多道题目都看完)，如果在考试的时候遇到高频题目。
而我正好写过的话，那么分数就是有保证的。或者，至少比写一篇完全没有看过的文章要强。如果我们把这些同学的看法当做一个论证的过程来找找其中的逻辑问题的话，大家就能明白为什么说“高频只是个传说了”。
在这个论证过程中，同学首先假设了一个前提，就是“写一篇已经写过的文章得到高分的可能性大于写一篇没有写过的文章”。可是，我们考虑一下，如果本身这篇文章从一开始按照这个同学的分析思路，包括写作的语言就存在巨大问题的话，那么，即使是考试的时候照着抄一遍，分数也仍然会是很低的。
因此，只有当你的写作思路正确，分析过程正确，语言表达正确这几个条件都满足的时候，对于题目的熟练程度，或者是否写过某个题目的作文，才会影响到最后的分数。当然，我们还同时忽略了考场上的临场状态的变化问题。
大家不妨计算一下每天有多少人去参加GRE的作文考试，一年下来又有多少人参加作文考试，其中在网上发布题目的人的比例有多少，而发布出来的题目被统计的又有多少。如果这些数据本身都没有确切值的话，那么统计的样本首先就是存在问题的。而“高频”的出现，很可能是“马太效应”的结果，即在很长一段时间里面，A题目被大多数人关注，于是成为了“高频”的一部分，于是，有人考到了这个题目，在网上发了帖子，那么这个题目的关注度继续上升。
而那些“低频”的题目，即使有人发了，也没人去关注，但是很可能在一段时间后，某个“低频”的题目其实出现的频率很高了，但是却依然没有人去关注它。因此，要想得到科学的统计，必须有一个平台，来随时完整统计大多数人在考试中遇到的题目的情况，并且实时更新，才能得到较为准确的数据。
GRE写作高分范文：公正的法律
“There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws。”
有两种法律：公正和不公正的。每个社会成员都有责任遵守公正的法律，但更重要的是，更应该不遵守和反抗不公正的法律。
关键词：obey just lawsdisobey and resist unjust laws
GRE写作范文：
论证分析
当我们面对司法改革，提出探讨司法理念时，往往会以“什么是司法的公正”、 “什么是法官的美德”等这样的形式提出问题。这种形式的问题所问的是关于一般的公正和美德的问题。在司法的实践中，对于具体的判决，人们一般是能够评判是否公正的，而问题是评判有无共性呢?如果不存在，那么人们的评判又是以什么为标准的呢?如果存在，那它又是怎样存在的呢?存在于哪里?而依照西方哲学的观点，这种存在于我们可感知的具体事物之外的东西就是法的理念。
众所周知，亚里土多德曾说过，要实现法治必须具备两个因素：其一，所有人都服从法律;其二，被遵守的法律本身是良好的法律。 亚里土多德的说法看似全面，但在实践中可能并不有效。
比如什么是良法，比如有人对允许堕胎、 安乐死、 同性恋的法律持有尖锐不同的观点。人认为允许堕胎维护了女性的自身权利，允许安乐死和同性恋表现了对个人自由意志和愿望的尊重;有人则认为允许堕胎是不人道的，没有保护胎儿的生存权利，允许安乐死违背了人的生存主旨，允许同性恋则败坏了社会的道德风气。在这种情况下，我们应当认定谁的观念是正确的?
我们又依据什么权力和所谓的理性剥夺和否定另外一些人的观念呢?此外，人们对某一事物的好坏认识会随时间的推移而发生变化，从前认为良好的法律现在可能认为不好，这时又怎么办呢?
因此，当认为某些法律不是良好的法律时，人们便会认为自己没有服从的义务，这样便会出现不服从法律的现象。进而言之，坚持“良好的法律”这一概念可能会使法治处于困难的境地。
Should we obey an unjust law? According to the theory of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 18th century French political philosopher, in a democratic society the state represents the general will of the citizens, and that in obeying its laws each citizen is pursuing his own real interests. Thus, in an ideal state, laws express the general will. An individual who disagrees with a law must be failing to look at things from the moral standpoint. Rousseau is talking about an ideal state where laws express people's general will, a will that aims at the common good. But the question is: are we living in an ideal state and do all the laws of our land express the common will of the people and should we obey all the laws even if they are unjust? Thenswer to this question can be different for different people.
GRE作文
篇4：GRE写作ARGUMENT逻辑技巧
GRE写作ARGUMENT区分主次要逻辑技巧
GRE写作怎样判断主次要逻辑漏洞?
如上文所说，其实很多时候一篇argument题目素材里，存在的逻辑漏洞往往不止一处，对于一些写作驳论文经验丰富的考生来说，有些题目甚至一眼望去就是千疮百孔的。但这并不代表大家随便抓住一点就可以写出很有说服力的文章。学会区分逻辑漏洞的主要和次要，集中精力从主要漏洞入手进行写作才能让文章更有说服力。下面小编通过一个实例为大家分析：
GRE写作ARGUMENT真题实例分析
The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine.
A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertising firms studied those whose executives reported needing no more than 6 hours of sleep per night had higher profit margins and faster growth. These results suggest that if a business wants to prosper, it should hire only people who need less than 6 hours of sleep per night.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
作文题目翻译
最近一项研究根据每晚平均睡眠时间对300名男性和女性Mentian广告经理需要的睡眠总量与他们公司的成功之间的关联。被研究的广告公司中，那些报告每晚需要的睡眠不超过6小时的经理有较高的利润率和较快的增长。这些结果表明，如果一个企业想要成功，就应该雇佣那些每晚只需要不超过6小时睡眠时间的人。
写一篇回应文章，探讨上述论据中明示和/或隐含的假设，并解释该论据如何建立在这些假设之上;如果这些假设不合理，会对该论据产生什么影响“;
逻辑链整理
如果一个企业想要成功，就应该雇佣那些每晚只需要不超过6小时睡眠时间的人。
写作思路解读
这道题目选自9月18日GRE考试机经，可以看出这道题目其实本身存在许多逻辑漏洞。比如STUDY的结论是否权威，300人的样本数是否足够，还有受访者的男女比例，企业成功能否只靠经理，该现象是否只存在特定行业中等等。逻辑漏洞一大堆，但并不代表着每个都值得大家大写特写一番。
一般来说，比较主要的漏洞往往是从题目本身出发的，比如刚才提到的企业成功能否只靠经理以及广告行业现象是否只是特定行业问题等等。对这些漏洞进行攻击，可以让你的文章更有说服力。而其他诸如针对调查结果合理性权威性的漏洞，只能说是次要漏洞，大家可以在写到最后的时候稍微提一提，但如果把这些次要问题当成主要问题来展开写作，就显得有些小题大做了。
GRE写作高分范文：审查的公正性
GRE作文题目：
Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.
审查很少能够做到公正。
GRE写作正文：
“Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while arousing applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.
Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the “common good” is the “monarch good”, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.
The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as “subversive” and “revolutionary”, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put more or less a negative effect on their development.
Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I don’t agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a more ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expect our God to create a more ideal species instead of imperfect human beings.
GRE写作高分范文：information
GRE写作题目：
Much of the information that people assume is factualactually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此，任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑，因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。
GRE写作范文：
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
To sum up，while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately，for the reason of the limitation of the abilities，I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves，as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis，I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable，we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.
GRE写作
篇5：GRE作文考试ARGUMENT参考
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.
A new study collected data that shows that people who snore are more likely to gain weight than are people who do not snore. It is well known that many people who snore also stop breathing frequently during the night for a few seconds, a condition called sleep apnea. The interruption of breathing wakes the person-often so briefly that the waking goes unnoticed-and can leave the person too tired during the day to exercise. Anyone who snores, therefore, should try to eat less than the average person and to exercise more .
The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper.
The librarians in our towns school system have reported that the number of trips that our students make to their school library on a voluntary basis has decreased significantly in recent years. For example, the average seventh-grade student visited the school library five times last year, but four of those visits were part of required classroom activities. This shows that our students are reading less than in the past. To address this problem, our town needs to improve the atmosphere of the libraries so that they will be comfortable places in which to work. If students view the libraries as uncomfortable, then they are unlikely to want to spend much time there.
The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine.
篇6：GRE作文考试ARGUMENT
GRE作文考试ARGUMENT
Ever since the 1950 s, when television sets began to appear in the average home, the rate of crimes committed by teenagers in the country of Alta has steadily increased. This increase in teenage crime parallels the increase in violence shown on television. According to several national studies, even very young children who watch a great number of television shows featuring violent scenes display more violent behavior within their home environment than do children who do not watch violent shows. Furthermore, in a survey conducted by the Observer, over 90 percent of the respondents were parents who indicated that prime-time televisionprograms that are shown between 7 p.m. and 9 p.m.-should show less violence. Therefore, in order to lower the rate of teenage crime in Alta, television viewers should demand that television programmers reduce the amount of violence shown during prime time.
The following appeared in the editorial section of a health and fitness magazine.
In a study of the effects of exercise on longevity, medical researchers tracked 500 middle-aged men over a 20-year period. The subjects represented a variety of occupations in several different parts of the country and responded to an annual survey in which they were asked: How often and how strenuously do you exercise? Of those who responded, the men who reported that they engaged in vigorous outdoor exercise nearly every day lived longer than the men who reported that they exercised mildly only once or twice a week. Given the clear link that this study establishes between longevity and exercise, doctors should not recommend moderate exercise to their patients but should instead encourage vigorous outdoor exercise on a daily basis.
篇7：GRE阅读逻辑和写作ARGUMENT题型因果关系常见出题思路
GRE阅读逻辑和写作ARGUMENT题型因果关系常见出题思路整理汇总
GRE考试中如何围绕因果关系出题?
首先大家需要了解的是GRE考试中是如何围绕因果关系来出题的，举个简单的例子，突然觉得胃痛，而之前刚吃了一份半生不熟的食物，那么这两者之间就存在了一定的因果关系，而如果胃痛是因为吃了生食，先不论这究竟是不是事实，围绕这种因果关系就会常见这些选项或者说提问方式：
1. 是否可能有其它原因导致胃痛?
假设assumption选项：不存在其它原因，就是因为吃了生食。
加强strengthen选项：平时也没有胃病，之前从来没吃过熟食等等，通过排除其它原因来强化这种因果关系。
削弱weaken选项：最近一直胃不舒服，可能是有点胃病症状，通过加入其它原因来削弱这种英国关系。
2. 因果关系是否能互换?
假设assumption选项：先吃的生食，然后才胃痛，明确两者之间的先后顺序。
加强strengthen选项：吃生食是在12点，胃痛是在2点。通过给出实际证据加强对因果关系的证明。
削弱weaken选项：好像吃生食之前胃就有点不舒服，或是因为胃不舒服所以才想吃点刺身之类不油腻的食物。通过给出反面证据来扭转因果关系。
3. 是否只是巧合?两件事之间其实并无因果关系?
假设assumption选项：某某科学机构研究表明吃生食必然会导致胃痛，两者之间就是这么简单的因果关系。
加强strengthen选项：吃生食的确很容易导致胃痛，某些数据证明等等。通过侧面正面加强因果关系，表明并非是巧合。
削弱weaken选项：吃生食的人很多但胃痛只是个别现象。从反面增加巧合的可能性，削弱两者之间的因果关系。
GRE考试因果关系常见逻辑关系词
有鉴于因果关系在GRE考试中出现频率很高，因此一些比较常见的因果关系词汇大家也需要有所了解，在遇到相应题目时这些关系词能给大家提供很好的解题线索：
due to, result of, cause, because, reason why等等。
因果关系和相互关系的区别
另外，GRE考试的常考逻辑关系causality中，有一种和因果关系比较接近的关系考生比较容易混淆，那就是相互关系correlation，两者之间虽然有一定的相似性，但其实还是有本质区别的，因果关系就是A事件发生导致了B事件发生，而相互关系则是A事件发生了，B事件也发生了，两者之间存在一定关联性，但并没有本质上的因果关系。大家需要明确两者的区别，特别是在逻辑阅读的选项判断时需要注意两者差异。
GRE分类词汇记忆：组成
3.21.3 组成
compose v. 组成;写，创作
constitute v. 组成，构成;建立
construct v. 构成，建筑，(建造)
formation n. 组织，形成;(军队)编队
formality n. 遵循的规范;拘泥形式;正式
formative adj. 形成的，影响发展的
institutionalized adj. 有组织的，制度化的
realign v. 重新组合(排列)
recombine v. 重组，再结合 (recombinant n. 重组体)
reconstitute v. 再组成;用水泡
component n. 成分，零部件
constituent n. 成分;选区内的选民
ingredient n. 成分
segment n. 部分 (segmentable adj. 可分割的 segmental adj. 部分的，片段的)
GRE分类词汇记忆
3.36.2 下降
descend v. 下来，下降
plummet v. 垂直或突然坠下;(n. 测深锤)
slippage n. 下降，滑动
slump v. 猛然落下;暴跌
GRE分类词汇记忆：减少
3.36.1 减少，减轻
abate v. 减少，减轻
abrade v. 磨损，磨小 (abraded adj. 磨损的)
brake v. 减速，阻止;n. 刹车
deaden v. 减低某物的力量或强度(削弱力量)
debilitate v. 使衰弱
decline v. 变弱，变小;拒绝;n. 消减
deduct v. 减去，扣除;演绎
detract v. 减去，贬低
dilute v. 把(液体)弄稀，弄淡
diminuendo n. (音乐、演奏)渐弱
diminution n. 减少，缩减
dwindle v. 变小
emasculate v. 削弱;阉割;adj. 柔弱的
flag v. 减弱，衰退;枯萎;(n. 旗，国旗)
impair v. 使弱，损害
implode v. 剧减;内爆
languish v. 衰弱;变得消瘦
minimize v. 把…减至最低数量或程度(最小化)
relent v. 减弱;动怜悯心
relenting adj. 减弱的，怜悯的
retard v. 减速;妨碍
sap v. 消弱，耗尽;n. 树液;活力
subtract v. 减去，减掉 (subtraction n. 减，减法)
taper v. (长形物体的)逐渐变短;n. 细蜡烛
underplay v. 淡化…的重要性;表演(角色)不充分
vitiate v. 削弱，损害
wane v. 减少，衰微;(月亏)
waste v. 损耗，使身体消瘦
abate v. 减轻，减少
allay v. 减轻，缓和
alleviate v. 缓和，减轻
assuage v. 缓和，减轻
buffer v. 缓冲，为…充当缓冲器
cushion v. 缓冲;n. 坐垫
defuse v. 缓和紧张状态或危急局面;从(爆破装置)中卸除引信
disarm v. 使缓和;缴某人的械
mitigate v. 减轻，缓和
palliate v. 减轻(痛苦);掩饰(罪行) (palliation n. 减轻，缓和)
palliative adj. 减轻的，缓和的;n. 缓释剂
salve v. 减轻，缓和;n. 药膏
soothe v. 减轻;抚慰
subdue v. 减轻;征服;压制
subdued adj. 缓和的，(光和声)柔和的;(人)温和的
temper v. 缓和;锤炼;n. 脾气
damp v. 减弱，制止振动(减振);adj. 潮湿的
damped adj. 减震的，压低(声音)的
muffle v. 使声音降低;裹住
muffled adj. (声音)压低的
muffler n. 消音器;围巾
mute v. 减弱声音;n. 弱音器;adj. 沉默的
muted adj. (声音)减弱的，变得轻柔的
abbreviate v. 缩短;缩写 (abbreviation n. 缩短;缩写)
abridge v. 删减;缩短
bowdlerize v. 删除，删改
curtail v. 削减，缩短
decline n. 消减;v. 变弱，变小;拒绝
diminution n. 缩减，减少
dock v. 剪短;扣除…的一部分工资
pare v. 削减，缩减;削;修剪
retrenchment n. 削减，节省
truncate v. 把(某物)截短，去尾
whittle v. 削减;削(木头)
ellipsis n. 省略
elliptical adj. 省略的;椭圆的;晦涩的 (ellipse n. 椭圆)
omit v. 省略，遗漏;疏忽
GRE分类词汇记忆：救助
3.16.3 救助
extricable adj. 可解救的，能脱险的
extricate v. 拯救，救出
rescue n./v. 解救;把…从法律监管下强行夺回
salvage n./v. (从灾难中)抢救，海上救助 (salvable adj. 可抢救的)
succor v./n. 救助，援助
篇8：GRE高分ARGUMENT作文写法分析
GRE高分ARGUMENT作文写法分析
GRE高分Argument作文范文写法分析
实例分析
The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:
”Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.“
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
参考范文
This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn’t necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.
The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.
This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.
Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.
In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e., coal mine). Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.
思路讲解
1. 这篇GRE作文首先在字数高达599words, GRE考试虽然没有对写作提出明确的字数要求，但其评分时偏好字数更多的文章却也是不争的事实。
2. 这篇文章在结构上采取了标准的五段式写法，首段、末端，中间三段，整体结构没有出现头重脚轻的问题，文章平衡性极佳。
3. 整篇文章在词句运用上极为出彩，没有出现陈词滥调、用词重复或堆砌句子的问题。
范文用法
对于这篇文章，最为错误的用法无疑就是把整篇文章囫囵吞枣一般死记硬背下来，然后上了考场进行大段默写。假如考生这么做，一个被判雷同抄袭扣甚至取消成绩的惩罚在所难免。当然大家对于其中一些精彩用词和句子也绝对不能直接照搬，否则同样有一定风险。正确做法是首先理解文章优势，了解其在逻辑论述和遣词造句上的精妙之处，然后结合自己的语言对文章进行改良，这样才能最大程度上吸收到这篇文章的精华所在。
GRE高分范文这么用才有收获
看过上面的例子，接下来小编就为大家具体介绍GRE高分范文的正确用法。
1. 首先，大家需要对范文的来源进行筛选和甄别。市面上打着高分满分GRE范文幌子的资料很多，但其中有不少是滥竽充数之辈，所选用的文章大多本身质量低劣根本称不上范文。为了避免学习到这些假货反而受到不良影响，大家首先需要找到真正高品质的范文资源。一般来说，官方或是权威机构出品的资料里，包含的范文质量较高，比如官方出品的OG指南中，涉及写作部分就有许多真正意义上的高分范文。另外诸如曼哈顿和MAGOOSH之类国外权威考试机构的复习资料中，也有不少优质范文。另外，许多权威教学机构都有自己的在线工具和模考软件，比如上面提到的两家机构，还有官方模考软件PP2，在作文部分都会配置一到两篇高分范文给大家参考，这些文章也是极好的。
2. 其次，范文中的好词妙句大家要消化改写后再使用。就如同在上文真题实例分析中所说，再好的句子，也绝对没有直接拿来就用的道理，一方面有雷同风险，另一方面每个人的语言用词习惯都有所不同，强行记忆和自己习惯不符的句子很容易出现记忆混淆，背诵错误的问题。所以，考生如果看到一些比较优秀的句子，那么不妨在不影响其质量的情况下，根据自身的写作风格稍作一些加工调整，消化吸收后再拿出来用到自己的文章中。
3. 再次，面对优秀范文，切忌整篇文章死记硬背。一个原因上面说过，容易被判雷同，另一个原因则是对记忆力消耗太大，每个人的记忆力都是有限的，而GRE作文题目又数量众多，考生如果看到一篇好文章就想要整个背下来，那么无论记性多好都会是件耗时费力的辛苦活，付出和回报完全不成比例。正确做法是学习这些文章的写作思路。GRE作文Argument是驳论文，要求找漏洞发现逻辑问题，这是需要一定技巧的，哪些是主要漏洞，如何展开驳论的层次层层递进，大家都可以通过范文来进行学习，这也是范文真正的价值所在。
4. 最后，范文中常会使用到一些不错的素材。素材本身可能并不出奇，但恰到好处的使用却能够为整篇文章增光添彩。考生不要迷信高分范文里的素材，简单粗暴地直接背素材，正确做法是学习能够让素材具备说服力的使用方法，比如哪些素材用在什么类型的题目，证明哪些观点时才能发挥最大作用。学会这种素材和题目的搭配才是核心关键。
GRE高分范文错误用法注意要点讲解
最后小编要特别提醒大家关于GRE高分范文的常见使用误区。可能有些考生有过这种经历，明明用了高分范文来复习，结果作文成绩却不升反降。会出现这种情况，正是因为大家在用法上出现了错误。考生需要特别注意的范文错误用法主要有两种，上文也有所提及，一个是原文照抄，这是大忌，后果也非常严重，绝对不能犯这种错误。另一个是思路照搬，看到相似题目不管三七二十一直接套用范文的思路。GRE作文中存在大量形似神异的题目，看起来说的是同一件事，用的事例也相近，但作文的写作要求和侧重点却有很大区别。大家一定要仔细审题后再确定写作思路，切忌直接套用范文的写作套路，一旦出现张冠李戴的情况，最后得分往往会惨不忍睹。
GRE写作高分范文：想法付诸行动的困难性
It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas. What most people find difficult, however, is accepting the way these new ideas are put into practice.
拥护革新和接受新想法很简单。但是在大多数人们看来，最困难的是接受把这些新想法付诸实现的方式。
GRE写作范文：：
The writer of the issue connotates an ironic phenomenon: though innovation is required in our era and eulogized by most people, application of it is clannished vehemently because of the fear of failure and the possibility of obtained possession and tradition impairing. The author grasps the paradox psychology of most people and pertinently reveals a universal mentality.
As is known that innovation may bring big progress and result in even a revolutionary transition of a society: the elevated efficiency of work, the ameliorated life, the enticing fruit of new technology and so on. Following with innovation of the second industrial revolution, great changes took place and immediately a renewed world unfolded before us with the application of its fruits. Seeing unimaginable profits and the magic power, who (including the society and government) can suppress their agitating desire to restrict development of innovation?
Unfortunately, innovation doesn't always follow the people's will and always acts like an uncontroled horse running in the plain. Worrying about the side-effect, people have to hold their desire back but admire those who are brave enough to taste crabs for the first time. Not everyone possesses the same courage as Biil Gate's, who dare invest on a fresh field and give up the chance of studying in Harvard University, which is the dream of most aggressive young people. Often, pondering what they have already possessed with what they might get from innovation, most people prefer the former to the latter, even content to sacrifice the latter to ensure the integer of the former. For example, a department may enroll those who are not very deft in the work but behave complaisant before higher-ups and deny to those who stick to their innovational opinion obstinately. After all, it is required more to cooperate with others harmoniously and conform to the traditional rules nowadays than to creat a new law according to individual penchant, in any company and corporation.
Maybe, some one argues that, how to cultivate innovation if personality should abdicate to interests of collective? Does the statement above alludes that employees should do nothing but keep silent and follow what the higher-ups dictated, strangling their inspiration to accord to the criterion today? No doubt, such supposition is rediculous. I mean that employees should try to approach their original though to tenet of the collective, not attempt to disobey the existed norm, respect suggestion and supposition of others and circumspect the innovation and then discuss with all the members in the company. That is, responsibility should be taken before the innovation is applied to practice.
Of course, many people don't have the ability that controling their compulsion of carrying their innovation into application. It doesn't lack of people who dare not apply innovation, and people who hold innovational thought are not scarc either, however,those who possess both of the two abilities and are lucky enough to encounter a proper opportunity to release their innovation is very few. The seperation of spirit of application and creation of innovation is the root of the the strange phenomenon, that innovation and new ideas are here and there while the acceptance and combination of them with application is too little to be heard.
GRE写作高分范文：冒险与计划
Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning.
在生活的所有领域中，成功往往更多的来自于把握机会或者冒险而不是通过仔细谨慎的计划。
GRE写作范文：
The speaker asserts people are more likely to attain success when taking chances or risks than planning carefully and cautiously. However, after comparing the characteristics of careful planning and taking chances, I strongly hold that they are of the same importance in the pursuit of success.
In competitive sports, while making appropriate training plans and effective competition strategies constitute necessary conditions of winning the matches, taking risks is almost inevitable when athletes or their coaches confront a sudden matter that might influence the course of a match and that has not been taken into consideration beforehand. In modern competitive sports, it is widely acknowledged that scientific and effective training contributes to athletes’ better performance during matches. Good competition strategies, on the other hand, resulting in the better allocation of physical force, better use of skills or the higher rate in scoring, also play a vital role.
However, when the star players of a soccer team or a basketball team are off the game or fail to implement their chief coach's strategic intention, leaving the whole team in adverseness, the coach faces the choice whether to substitute he/she or not. No doubt substituting a star player with a bench player means taking risk because the bench player may not perform as good as the star player and may make matters worse. If this happens, the substitution will incur discontentment of the players and critique from the team's fans, media and the boss. The capability of the coach may then be suspected and he/she may even be fired. Nevertheless, if the coach dares not to take the risk to substitute a poorly performed star player, his/her team will probably lose the game. Taking chances and risks is reasonable when one is dealing with something that has not been taken into consideration previously. So, in competitive sports, planning and risking are both necessary.
In academic fields, careful and cautious planning is required for large projects and application disciplines while revolutionary scientific breakthroughs are almost impossible without taking chances or risks. Before starting the research project on human genome, scientists had already made plans on the content and method of the research. They did not have to take any chances or risks because all they should do have already been carefully planned. There were no technical obstacles that had not been solved. Therefore, they just followed the plan step by step and accomplished the project in the end. As for significant scientific breakthroughs, they are the important discoveries and theories that disaccord, at least to some extent, with established principles or our intuitions, such as the Theory of Relativity and quantum mechanics. One has no choice but to take chances because established theories may not be applicable on the boundary of what is known and what is unknown. Only after being examined through experiments, practices and observations, can they be confirmed or belied. In a word, planning and taking chances or risks are different means for different levels of academic researches.
In the business world, cautious planning contributes to the long-term development of a company and at the same time, risking is imperative for a company to survive, develop and thrive in the highly competitive society. Planning carefully on inquiring market, training stuff and manufacturing products ensure a company's long-term development by keeping its profit increasing or at least not declining. On the other hand, taking risks, such as incorporating with another company, involving in the market fields that have already been occupied by other enterprises or involving in the market fields that are not considered so profitable, is also necessary because these may save the company from the adversity or help to set foot in new businesses. Clearly,in the business field, planning and risking complement each other.
To conclude, success in any realm of life comes equally from taking chances or risks and from careful and cautious planning. In most cases, they complement each other and pave the way towards success.
GRE
篇9：GRE英语作文考试ARGUMENT的
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. The following is a letter to the editor of a local newspaper.
As a local merchant, I wish to support the development of a ski resort in the state park north of our township. Along with many other merchants who favor the proposal by Ski the Slopes, Incorporated, I would, of course, experience a growth in my business. But I also know how much more prosperous, not to mention lively and interesting, our community would be if tourism increased. Since the main opposition comes from a few environmentalists who do not even live in this community, I see no reason to give in to their views. The First National Bank has finally researched the project and agreed to fund it. As a result, I see no reason to delay development of the resort.
Environmentalists are people who advocate the preservation of the natural environment.
The Trash-Site Safety Council has recently conducted a statewide study of possible harmful effects of garbage sites on the health of people living near the sites. A total of five sites and 300 people were examined. The study revealed, on average, only a small statistical correlation between the proximity of homes to garbage sites and the incidence of unexplained rashes among people living in these homes. Furthermore, although it is true that people living near the largest trash sites had a slightly higher incidence of the rashes, there was otherwise no correlation between the size of the garbage sites and people s health. Therefore, the council is pleased to announce that the current system of garbage sites does not pose a significant health hazard. We see no need to restrict the size of such sites in our state or to place any restrictions on the number of homes built near the sites.
篇10：GRE写作ARGUMENT作文高分写法思路
1.首先从头至尾读一遍题，然后搞清楚题目在讲什么，避免发生理解错误。
2.找出题目的大结论，即在经过一大堆分析和延伸之后，作者得出了什么样的结论。
3.找出题目的关键点，即作者为了得出这样的结论给出了几个事实例证。
4.分析作者用了什么样的逻辑推理连接了事实和结论。
大家看到结论的荒谬了吧?还有分析的不可靠，数据没有得到论证，调查时间太短，可攻击点太多了!但是，请大家看清楚以下这句话：以上这些全都不是攻击点!
真正的攻击点是第4点，即“分析作者用了什么样的逻辑推理连接了事实和结论”。当作者说“所以”“因此”这样的词的时候，我们一定要提高警惕。看看上下文，作者是怎么说出“所以”的，那里一定会有问题!
一般来说这样找出的攻击点大概会有2-4个，这样足够了，如果太多了反而不便于展开。将各个事实与小结论一一对应起来，然后化整为零，各个突破。如果两个觉得少的话，可以稍微展开一下，这个后面再说!
篇11：GRE写作ARGUMENT作文高分写法思路
1.在看范文的时候不知道大家有没有注意到，高分的作文往往并不是以一种敌对、嘲讽或者鄙夷的语气写的，他们往往站在帮助者的角度，以一种温和的态度建议原作者再考虑更多的可能从而得出更好的解决方案。
2.我们也可以想想，当我们提出质疑的时候，无非是给出了一些其他的可能和它因。那么，题目里说的情况有没有可能发生呢?当然有!因此，全部否定显然是不应该的，而站在一个帮助者的角度，用一些较为温和的词和写法，一定能让你的文章显得更加亲近和值得信赖，而不会只有突如其来本能的抗拒。
篇12：GRE写作ARGUMENT作文高分写法思路
1.大家在整理完攻击点以后一定会有的困惑就是这个应该先说哪个呢?按顺序来说当然可以，只是这样组织出来的文章显得相当生硬。如果有更好的办法，我们为何要用这样如同肢解一般的写法呢。
2.在确定顺序之前，大家还记不记得前面提到的，大结论?这个时候大家可以想一想，大结论的主要关注点是什么呢?从这个方向来拎，主线一下子就很清楚了。再把其他小结论安上去，既不会显得生硬，反而会有锦上添花详略得当之感。
3.因此，最重要的点，也即主线，一定要放在正文第一段加以论述。
篇13：GRE写作ARGUMENT作文高分写法思路
1.在论证的时候，因为你已经组织好了自己的攻击顺序和攻击要点，也即逻辑和思想都完备了。这时候再展开也是相当容易的。展开的方法也很简单，即表述清楚攻击点的逻辑错误，再给出它因。
2.大家有可能会想：这样简单的方法会不会显得文章很乏味，不具有可读性。如果你一直用一种方式当然会，可是，如果有的地方用对比，有的地方反问，有的地方攻击点和它因互相切换彼此呼应呢?仔细想想奥妙无穷!
篇14：GRE写作ARGUMENT作文高分写法思路
大的思路都如上，只要这样写没有写不出来的文章，而且写出来的文章一定是自己的文章，是值得获得ETS高分的文章。但是针对“六”的三种题型，其中还是有各自特殊的写作方法的。
GRE作文题库话题总结之科技
1.”The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.“
人总是比机器聪明，因为机器只不过是人类的工具而已。
2.”The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that everyone has more leisure time.“
技术进步的最主要的目标就是提高人们的效率，使得每个人都有更多的闲暇时间。
3.”Technologies not only influence but actually determine social customs and ethics.“
科学技术不但影响而且决定了社会风俗和民族习惯。
4.”Technology creates more problems than it solves, and may threaten or damage the quality of life.“
科学技术产生了许多不能解决的问题，对人们的生活质量构成威胁。
5.”Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress.“
不犯错误就不会有发现和进步。
6.”The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.“
摄像机可以通过如此精确而有力的纪录手段来再现当代生活，因此它已经代替书面纪录成为一种更重要的纪录手段。
7.”High-speed electronic communications media, such as electronic mail and television, tend to prevent meaningful and thoughtful communication.“
8.”In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books.“
在电视机时代，阅读书籍已经没有原来那样重要了。人们从电视上学到的东西丝毫不比从书本中学来的少。
9.”Because of television and worldwide computer connections, people can now become familiar with a great many places that they have never visited. As a result, tourism will soon become obsolete.“
通过电视和全世界联网的计算机，人们得以了解很多他们没有去过的地方。所以，旅游事业会越来越不景气。
10.”With the growth of global networks in such areas as economics and communication, there is no doubt that every aspect of society—including education, politics, the arts, and the sciences—will benefit greatly from international influences.“
随着全球网络的增长，如经济和通讯，整个社会的各方各面，包括教育、政治、艺术和科学，都从中获益非浅。
GRE作文备考：收集与美国思维相关的素材
1.GRE写作素材积累
我们要多看报纸，多看杂志和书籍，从这些素材挑选好的文章，从而使自己的文章可以得到润色。作文素材积累很重要，因为有时我们可以跳过自己写的环节直接引用他人的文章素材，这是一个节省时间的最好方法。所以注重GRE作文素材的积累是一个很有效的方法。
2.GRE写作素材评估
作文素材也有好有坏，我们要对自己的作文素材进行评估，那么这样的话就不会使自己的作文显得很没有水准。我们在看报纸或是杂志或是书籍的时候可以边看边记录，这样有用的东西都被我们记录下来，在考试的时候直接运用，取得高分。
3.GRE写作素材运用
作文素材运用也是一门学科，因为我们如何去把握素材，如何运用素材也要自己考虑，通常写作得用一到两个素材为最佳，一个太少，二个则显得太过于杂乱，好好把握素材的量是一门很必要的学科。
有意而为之，专门为了新GRE作文来准备一些相关的资料，就可以取得理想的成绩。若是想要考出一个好成绩，花费时间是一定的，没有提前准备就绪的话，其实很难达到理想效果。所以在准备新GRE写作时候，一定要认真收集GRE写作素材。
篇15：GRE写作ARGUMENT作文高分写法思路
1.传统型：即事实与小结论互相穿插，比较常见的类型。
2.对比型：两个相似事物或情况进行对比。
3.研究型：以一个调查或研究为主要描述对象。
篇16：GRE写作ARGUMENT作文高分写法思路心得
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.
The following is a recommendation from the dean at Foley College, a small liberal arts college, to the president of the college.
”Since college-bound students are increasingly concerned about job prospects after graduation, Foley College should attempt to increase enrollment by promising to find its students jobs after they graduate. Many administrators feel that this strategy is a way for Foley to compete against larger and more prestigious schools and to encourage students to begin preparing for careers as soon as they enter college. Furthermore, a student who must choose a career path within his or her first year of college and who is guaranteed a job after graduation is more likely to successfully complete the coursework that will prepare him or her for the future.“
The following is a letter to the editor of the Glenville Gazette, a local newspaper.
”Over the past few years, the number of people who have purchased advance tickets for the Glenville Summer Concert series has declined, indicating lack of community support. Although the weather has been unpredictable in the past few years, this cannot be the reason for the decline in advance ticket purchases, because many people attended the concerts even in bad weather. Clearly, then, the reason for the decline is the choice of music, so the organizers of the concert should feature more modern music in the future and should be sure to include music composed by Richerts, whose recordings Glenville residents purchase more often than any other contemporary recordings. This strategy will undoubtedly increase advance ticket purchases and will increase attendance at the concerts.“
The following is a letter from a professor at Xanadu College to the college‘s president.
”The development of an extensive computer-based long-distance learning program will enhance the reputation of Xanadu College. This program would allow more students to enroll in our courses, thereby increasing our income from student tuition. Traditional courses could easily be adapted for distance learners, as was shown by the adaptation of two traditional courses for our distance learning trial project last year. Also, by using computer programs and taped lectures, faculty will have fewer classroom obligations and more time to engage in extensive research, thereby enhancing the reputation of Xanadu.“
The following is a letter to the editor of the Roseville Gazette.
”Despite opposition from some residents of West Roseville, the arguments in favor of merging the townships of Roseville and West Roseville are overwhelming. First, residents in both townships are confused about which authority to contact when they need a service; for example, the police department in Roseville receives many calls from residents of West Roseville. This sort of confusion would be eliminated with the merger. Second, the savings in administrative costs would be enormous, since services would no longer be duplicated: we would have only one fire chief, one tax department, one mayor, and so on. And no jobs in city government would be lost-employees could simply be reassigned. Most importantly, the merger will undoubtedly attract business investments as it did when the townships of Hamden and North Hamden merged ten years ago.“
篇17：GRE写作ARGUMENT作文高分写法思路心得
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.
From a letter to the editor of a city newspaper.
”One recent research study has indicated that many adolescents need more sleep than they are getting, and another study has shown that many high school students in our city are actually dissatisfied with their own academic performance. As a way of combating these problems, the high schools in our city should begin classes at 8:30 A.M. instead of 7:30 A.M., and end the school day an hour later. This arrangement will give students an extra hour of sleep in the morning, thereby making them more alert and more productive. Consequently, the students will perform better on tests and other assignments, and their academic skills will improve significantly.“
Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many servers have reported that a number of customers who still ask for butter do not complain when they are given margarine instead. Clearly, either these customers cannot distinguish margarine from butter, or they use the term ”butter“ to refer to either butter or margarine. Thus, to avoid the expense of purchasing butter, the Happy Pancake House should extend this cost-saving change to its restaurants in the southeast and northeast as well.
Many employees of major United States corporations are fearful that they will lose their jobs in the near future, but this fear is largely unfounded. According to a recent study, a majority of companies expected to make new hires in the coming year, while fewer companies expected to lay off employees. In addition, although it is very disturbing to be laid off, the proliferation of programs and of workshops designed to improve job-finding skills has made being laid off far less painful than it once was.
In the Bayhead Public Library, books that are rarely borrowed continue to take up shelf space year after year, while people who want to read a recent novel frequently find that the library‘s only copy is checked out. Clearly, the library‘s plan to replace books that are borrowed no more than once a year with sufficient copies of more recent books will solve this problem. The protest we have heard since this plan was made public has come from a small, and thus unrepresentative, group of some thirty people and so should therefore be ignored.
篇18：GRE写作ARGUMENT作文高分写法思路心得
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.
The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper.
”Membership in Oak City‘s Civic Club-a club whose primary objective is to discuss local issues-should continue to be restricted to people who live in Oak City. People who work-in Oak City but who live elsewhere cannot truly understand the business and politics of the city. It is important to restrict membership to city residents because only residents pay city taxes and therefore only residents understand how the money could best be used to improve the city. At any rate, restricting membership in this way is unlikely to disappoint many of the nonresidents employed in Oak City, since neighboring Elm City‘s Civic Club has always had an open membership policy, and only twenty-five nonresidents have joined Elm City‘s Club in the last ten years.“
The following appeared in the annual report from the president of the National Brush Company.
”In order to save money, we at the National Brush Company have decided to pay our employees for each brush they produce instead of for the time they spend producing brushes. We believe that this policy will lead to the production of more and better brushes, will allow us to reduce our staff size, and will enable the company factories to operate for fewer hours-resulting in savings on electricity and security costs. These changes will ensure that the best workers keep their jobs and that the company will earn a profit in the coming year.“
The following is a memorandum written by the director of personnel to the president of the Cedar Corporation.
”It would be a mistake to rehire the Good-Taste Company to supply the food in our employee cafeteria next year. It is the second most expensive caterer in the city. In addition, its prices have risen in each of the last three years, and it refuses to provide meals for people on special diets. Just last month three employees complained to me that they no longer eat in the cafeteria because they find the experience ‘unbearable.‘ Our company should instead hire Discount Foods. Discount is a family-owned local company and it offers a varied menu of fish and poultry. I recently tasted a sample lunch at one of the many companies that Discount serves and it was delicious-an indication that hiring Discount will lead to improved employee satisfaction.“
The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company.
”Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course was able to read a five-hundred-page report in only two hours; another graduate rose from an assistant manager to vice president of the company in under a year. Obviously, the faster you can read, the more information you can absorb in a single workday. Moreover, Easy Read costs only $500 per employee-a small price to pay when you consider the benefits to Acme. Included in this fee is a three-week seminar in Spruce City and a lifelong subscription to the Easy Read newsletter. Clearly, Acme would benefit greatly by requiring all of our employees to take the Easy Read course.“
篇19：GRE作文之Issue和Argument的区别及技巧
GRE作文：Issue和Argument的区别及技巧
GRE作文之Issue：准备提纲
Issue要求考生根据所给的题目，完成一篇表明立场的逻辑立论文。Issue题库涉及社会、文化、科技、历史、政治、艺术等诸多方面。不同类型的题目有较大差别，但在同一类型的题目中却包含了许多命题方向非常接近的题目。
Issue写作对于论据的要求是非常高的，因此你的名人事例的储备，相关知识量的积累是非常重要的。这一环节也正是GRE考生最为头疼的一部分，举不出支持自己的观点的例子，因此让自己的文章显得只有苍白的论证，缺乏说服力。因此要多读历史，积累例子，尤其关注那些重要的哲学家、科学家、艺术家、政治领袖等人的生平事迹、主要贡献。例如Issue里的这样一道真题：“Truly profound thinkers and highly creative artists are always out of step with their time and their society。”(真正影响深远的思想家和具有高度创造力的艺术家总是与他们的时代和社会步伐不一致)。这个题目如果没有必备的那些思想家和艺术家的例子，文章必然缺乏说服力。因此读历史积累写作素材，具体说就是论据素材是拿高分的一个重要环节。
另外，写提纲对于Issue部分的备考是至关重要的，也是最占用时间、最核心的一个环节。每一个题目的提纲力求详细，不用去写开头段和结尾段，就写正文各段你的各个分支观点，也就是正文部分的论证过程。除了论证以外，写完后想想可以用些什么论据，把支持论证的论据也写上。需要强调的是，一定要较为详细地写Issue提纲，否则，在考场如果遇到没有思考过的题目，很容易自乱阵脚，导致失败。此外，题目必须考前按题材分类去写提纲，看懂，知道对立面和大致写作思路。论据往往在同类的很多题目中通用。写完提纲后，再写20-40篇完整的文章(语言能力弱的话，尽量多写)。
GRE作文之Argument：掌握逻辑
Argument要求考生分析所给题目，完成一篇驳论文，指出并且有力地驳斥题目中的主要逻辑错误。Argument部分，首先要熟悉每一个题目，找出主要的逻辑错误，也就是Argument题目的提纲，同时每一个逻辑错误准备一套语言套路去说。写完每一个题目的提纲后，写10-15篇完整的文章(语言能力弱的话，可以增加写作量)，找partner帮你改，知道错误以后再重写。
有些考生写GRE文章，喜欢用专业性的逻辑用语，其实没有必要，就事论事比较好。在批驳的时候为了显得有力，可以多用用for example、it is possible that、it is likely that之类的句型，因为Argument就是挑错与找茬的过程。如果实在觉得错误不好找，那么就根据每一句话批，基本上，每一个表示原因的句子中都可能存在逻辑错误。
有人认为，Argument背一下错误分类就可以了。但是在实践中这些只是次要的方面，主要的还在于寻找论述者的论据和事实是否对论点做了充分且必要的证明。只有找出他们之间的缺点和不足,文章才会流畅。掌握逻辑的因果关系，更好地把握文章的结论,会写出更漂亮的文章，而不是仅仅的survey、 response、data等一些谁都用的东西，无论什么都是越具体越有说服力。
GRE作文难度： Issue>Argument
总的来看，Issue难度高于Argument。对于考生来说，Issue比Argument要求拥有更扎实的写作功底和更严密的逻辑思维。同时，ETS对于Issue的模板化和plagiarisms更加敏感。总之，获得Issue高分需要较多的努力。相比之下，Argument内容相对单一 (出错的逻辑类型比较少)，题目中给了考生更多的提示信息，因此提高Argument成绩容易一些。
参照ETS评过分的范文，我们不难发现：无论Issue还是Argument在评分标准上都有共同之处：第一，观点要有深度，论证要有说服力;第二，组织要有条理，表达清晰准确;第三，语言流利，句式复杂，词汇丰富。这三条说的也就是行文的“思想性”、“结构性”以及“表达性”。众多高分作文的考生大凡都在这三个方面做得很好，我们理所当然也要从这里入手，采取“各个击破”的方法解剖GRE作文的本质，从而得到一个理想分数。
以上就是新GRE作文Issue和Argument的区别以及GRE写作技巧介绍，各位考生在进行GRE作文备考时可以采取各个击破的方法，分别进行攻克，争取拿到GRE写作高分。
GRE作文ARGUMENT官方题库满分范文点评
GRE作文官方题库ARGUMENT题目：
“Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents. In contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams’ revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch, and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch’s $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago, I listed my home with Fitch and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams.”
【满分范文赏析】
The author argues that Adams Realty is superior to Fitch Realty. To support this claim the author cites statistics about the number and working hours of agents, and the number and sales prices of homes sold by the two farms. Further, the author cites anecdotal evidence involving personal experience with Fitch and Adams. A careful analysis reveals that this evidence lends little credible support for the argument.
【本段结构】
本段采用了标准的Argument开头段结构，即C—E—F的开头结构。段落首先概括原文的Conclusion，接下来概括原文为支持其结论所引用的一系列Evidence，最后给出开头段到正文段的过渡句，指出原文的Flaw，即其Evidence不能为其结论提供可靠的支持。
【本段功能】
本段作为Argument开头段，具体功能就在于发起攻击并概括原文的结论，即Adams不动产公司要优于Fitch不动产公司。本段接下来分布列举了原文为支持其结论所引用的证据——这两家公司所拥有经纪人的数目和工作时间、二者所售出的住宅的数量和价格、以及与两家公司接触的个人经历等等。这些信息的归纳为正文段中即将进行的具体攻击作出铺垫。
The claim is partially based on the fact that Adams has more agents than Fitch and that many of Fitch’s agents work only part-time. There is no correlation between the number of employees, their working hours, and the quality of their work. Without such a link, we could consider the possibility that a smaller firm could be more effective than a larger one and, likewise, that a part-time agent could be more effective than a full-time agent. Besides, the author does not provide any information about the specific number of Adams agents who work part-time.
【本段结构】
本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即：概括第一个逻辑错误的错误类型和其在原文中出现的位置，接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。
【本段功能】
本段作为正文第一段，攻击原文所犯的第一个重要逻辑错误——相关性错误。原文的论点部分建立在Adams的经纪人数目更多并且Fitch的很多经纪人仅兼职工作这一事实上。然而，一个较小规模的公司可能会比一个较大规模的公司效率更高;同理，一位兼职的经纪人也可能会比一位全职的经纪人工作效率更高。另外，原文作者并没有对Adams的兼职经纪人的具体数目提供更多信息。
The claim is also supported by the fact that Adams sold more properties than Fitch last year. One year of sales records is an insufficient sample. It is possible that in most other years Adams could have sold fewer properties than Fitch. Moreover, the disparity in sales volume could be explained by factors other than the comparative quality of the two firms. For example, perhaps Adams serves a denser geographic area or in an area where turnover in home-ownership is higher for reasons unrelated to Adams’ effectiveness. It is even possible that the only reason sales volume is higher at Adams is because the company employs more agents but, perhaps, each Adams agent sells fewer homes on average than each Fitch agent does. Without ruling out such alternative explanations for the disparity in sales volume, the author cannot defend the conclusion based on such scant evidence.
【本段结构】
本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即：概括第二个逻辑错误的错误类型和其在原文中出现的位置，接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。
【本段功能】
本段作为正文第二段，攻击原文中出现的第二个重要逻辑错误——调查类错误+因果类错误。除上一段中提到的论据外，原文所依赖的另一论据是Adams去年比Fitch售出了更多的房产这一事实。然而，仅仅一年的销售数据是一个不充分的样本——可能在大多数其它年份里Adams的房产销售量均低于Fitch的房产销售量。进一步，本段指出两家公司房产销售量之间的差异可以被这两家公司的相对竞争力之外的其它可能因素所解释，并随后提出了两种其它的可能解释。最后，本段指出作者在没有排除这些其它可能解释之前是不能利用如此缺乏的证据对其结论进行辩护的。
Support for the claim is also drawn from the average sales price of homes. This evidence only illustrates that the homes that Adams sells are more valuable on average than the ones that Fitch sells, not that Adams is more effective in selling homes than Fitch. Moreover, it is possible that a few relatively high-priced or low-priced properties skewed these averages, rendering any conclusions about the comparative quality of the two firms based on these averages irrelevant.
【本段结构】
本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即：概括第三个逻辑错误的错误类型和其在原文中出现的位置，接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。
【本段功能】
本段作为正文第三段，攻击原文中出现的第三个重要逻辑错误——因果类错误+平均值错误。在原文中，对两家不动产公司房产平均销售价的比较也为原文论点提供了支持。然而，这一证据仅能说明Adams所售房产平均而言比Fitch所售房产的价值更高，而并不能说明Adams的售房效率比Fitch更高。进一步，本段指出房产售价的平均值可能会受到个别售价相对较高或较低的房产的影响，因此基于这些平均值所得出的任何关于这两家不动产公司品质比较的结论均是不相干的。
GRE issue写作优秀实例：全球化
题目：
With the growth of global networks in such areas as economics and communication, there is no doubt that every aspect of the society -- including education, politics, the arts and the sciences -- will benefit greatly from international influences.
随着全球网络在经济和通讯等领域中的发展，毫无疑问，社会的各个领域——包括教育、政治、、艺术和科学——都会从国际影响中获益匪浅。
正文：
I fundamentally agree with the contention in the title statement that, with the growth of global network in many areas, every aspect will benefit from international influences more or less. However, the continually appearing harmful byproducts of globalization,though maybe not so disturbing right now, calls for a more comprehensive and balanced view in which the positive and negative influences are both considered.
Admittedly, globalization is a process leading to improving productivity in increasing national welfare in every country who participates in it. As David Ricardo, one of the most important economist of the Classical Political Economics, brilliantly illustrated as the famous Law of Comparative Advantage, ”Even if one nation is less efficient than other countries in every commodities, there is still a basis for mutually beneficial trade,when every nation keep producing commodity in which its comparative advantage (presenting as comparative price in a monetary society) is greater and exchange with other countries for other products." Nowadays, not only has this principle been proved right in economic area, but in culture, politics, education and social spheres, it becomes a fundamental rule and primary notion based on which the policies are established. Thus the idea is widely accepted that material progress and well-being of one country will do good to that of others.
However, when we enjoy the advantages of the globalization, there are still many disconcerting phenomenon along with this process. First of all, more and more multinationals from developed countries locate their manufacturing departments, which produce much pollution, in developing countries like Thailand, Vietnam and China, while leave their Research&Development sectors at home for some cost-saving reasons. But this aggregates the environmental deterioration and industry structure laggard in the developing countries. In other words, people in these countries will suffer the potential dangers from international influences.
In addition, too rapid globalization help deracinate some cultures in powerless position.As an example, in China, fewer and fewer children and youth are interested in the Chinese Opera, not to say take it as a career. Their most favorite singers are Branny Spears and Robby Williams who are popular all over the world. But, can you simply conclude that R&B and Rap music is of more values to the young people in China than the Chinese Opera that has a history of over years? Actually, though energy- and time-consuming, it is one of the most important responsibilities, as a member of the society, to protect those ancient cultures from being bogged down in the Sargasso sea of modern culture when we keep on with the globalization.
Finally, the loss of intelligence is another dilemma confronted by developing countries in these days. Whether supported by national scholarship or self-financed, many students from these countries maintain a further education in western countries.Nevertheless, when they find satisfying job opportunities, they will probably not go back and work for their motherland. Unfortunately, this part of students is always among the most intelligent human resources of the country, who are supposed to be the main force to construct the country. This kind of destruction to a society can even not be measured by money.
To sum up, without a open attitude to the world, a nation becomes myopic and eventually inefficient. Without considering the negative influences brought by the process of globalization, nations, especially the developing countries, will suffer from the latent destructions sooner or later. Though we may not accuse globalization for all the harms, it is advisable for everyone to pay our attention to it and do our best to constrain the bad effects to the least. Otherwise, it is unprofitable to choose construct the global networks, not only to us, but to our descendants.
篇20：GRE写作ISSUE和ARGUMENT作文高分写法策略分析
GRE写作ISSUE和ARGUMENT作文高分写法策略分析
GRE考试ISSUE写作练法
ISSUE类作文中，不同类型的题目有较大的差别，但是在同一类型的题目中却包含了许多命题的方向非常接近的题目，讨论的内容十分接近。这些题目，本质上是一致的，考生完全可以用一篇文章来应对这一类题目。除去这些同类题目，题库中的需要我们对付的也就是200道左右。考试中，会有两题供考生选择，因此，Issue练习的最佳数量应在100篇左右。理论上讲，达到这种境界的考生，在考试中遇到自己练习过的题目的概率是100%，这对于获得高分有至关重要的作用。
当然，练习这么多的文章需要考生付出相当多的时间和精力，而大部分考生都没有这么充裕的时间。一般来说，针对不同类型的Issue题目，要练习50篇左右。这样考生在考场上遇到熟题的机率仍有50%。
GRE考试ARUMENT写作练法
Argument题库内容丰富，但就题目中出错的逻辑类型来说，就显得较为单一了，考生可以用完全一致的驳斥方法来进行写作。
另外，Argument题目中大都提供了相当丰富的背景信息，所以考生总不至于无话可说。总而言之，Argument的难度要比Issue低一些，只要考生把各种逻辑错误熟练的掌握，并能清楚明白的表述出来，成绩一般不会低于4分。Argument题库中的逻辑错误，粗略的统计了一下，大概有8、9种，如果考生想要在Argument部分拿到4.5以上的成绩，那么针对每种错误类型练习至少要练习3篇，总数在30左右就可以了。
GRE分类词汇记忆：乏味
2.2.6 乏味
arid adj. 枯燥的;干旱的 (aridness n. 干燥)
boring adj. 无趣的，乏味的
corny adj.平淡无奇的;乡巴佬的
drab adj. 无聊的;枯黄色的
dreary adj. 沉闷的，乏味的
dull adj. (枯燥乏味的);不鲜明的;迟钝的;v. 变迟钝
ennui n. 无聊，倦怠;v. 使无聊
grind n. 枯燥乏味的工作;v. 磨碎，碾碎
humdrum adj. 单调的，乏味的
insipid adj. 乏味的，枯燥的
lackadaisical adj. 无兴趣的;无精打采的
monotone adj. 单调的
monotonous adj. 单调的，无聊的
monotony n. 单调，千篇 一律
prosaic adj. 单调的，无趣的
stodgy adj. 乏味的
tame adj. 沉闷的;驯服的
tedious adj. 沉闷的，冗长的
tedium n. 单调乏味
vapid adj. 索然无味的 (vapidity n. 乏味)
GRE分类词汇记忆：急躁
brash adj. 性急的;无礼的
compulsion n. 难以抗拒的冲动;强迫
explosive adj. 使人冲动的;爆炸性的;n. 炸药
grating adj. 恼人的;(声音)刺耳的
impetuous adj. 冲动的，鲁莽的 (impetuosity n. 冲动)
impulse n. 冲动;刺激
impulsive adj. 易冲动的
irritation n. 急躁，愤怒，刺激
petulance n. 性急，发脾气，暴躁
petulant adj. 性急的，暴躁的
summarily adv. 仓促地;概括地
testy adj. 性急的，暴躁的
berserk adj. 疯狂的，狂怒的 (berserker n. 狂暴者)
demented adj. 疯狂的
distracted adj. 心烦意乱的，精神不集中的
distraught adj. 心神狂乱的
distract v. 使发狂;分心，转移
frantic adj. 疯狂的，狂乱的
frenetic adj. 狂乱的，发狂的
frenzy n. 狂暴，极度激动的状态
fury n. 狂暴，狂怒，激烈;狂怒的人;(希神)复仇女神
insane adj. 疯狂的
insanity n. 疯狂;愚昧
possessed adj. 疯狂的;着迷的 (possess v. 拥有，迷住 possession n. 财产，所有物)
queer adj. 疯狂的，奇怪的
tempestuous adj. 狂暴的
GRE分类词汇记忆：迷惑
addle v. 使昏乱;使腐坏 (addled adj. 头脑混乱的)
baffle v. 使困惑，难倒 (baffling adj. 令人困惑的)
befuddle v. 使迷惑，使为难;使酒醉昏迷
befuddlement n. 迷惑不解
bemused adj. 茫然的，困惑的
bewilder v. 迷惑，混乱
bewildering adj. 令人迷惑的，费解的
captivate v. 迷惑，吸引 (captivation n. 吸引力，魅力)
confound v. 使迷惑，搞混
daze v. 使茫然，使眩晕
delirious adj. 精神错乱的
delirium n. 精神错乱
deranged adj. 精神错乱的，有精神病的
derangement n. 精神错乱
discombobulate v. 使困惑，扰乱
discombobulated adj. 扰乱的，打乱的
discomfited adj. 困惑的，尴尬的
elude v. 搞不清;逃避
enthrall v. 迷惑，迷住
fascinate v. 迷惑，迷住
illusive adj. 迷惑人的，迷幻的
muddle n. 迷惑，混乱
nonplus v. 使窘困迷惑;n. 迷惑，窘境 (nonplussed adj. 窘困迷惑的)
obfuscate v. 使困惑，使迷惑 (obfuscation n. 昏迷，困惑)
obsess v. 使…困窘，使…烦扰;迷住
quandary n. 困惑，进退两难
stupefy v. (使)茫然，吓呆 (stupid adj. 愚笨的)
篇21：GRE作文改革后对argument写作所造成的变化介绍
GRE作文改革后对argument写作所造成的变化介绍
在GRE作文中，多数同学会觉得Argument比Issue容易上手，也更容易形成固定的写作套路。尤其是老GRE中， Argument的写作要求千篇 一律，可以用同样的思路来应对，主要的工作是针对不同类别的逻辑错误准备相应的模板。而新GRE中情况有了变化：每一篇Argument材料之后都有附有一段instructions，指出写作角度和侧重点。本文针对新GRE中Argument的一大类instructions，谈谈我们对其内涵的理解，并给出我们在写作思路上的建议。由于是讨论特定类型的Argument写法，因此本文并不是Argument的入门介绍，而是适合对Argument已有一定的了解的同学来阅读参考。
新GRE的Argument中常见以下几种instructions：
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
★ GRE写作ISSUE和ARGUMENT作文高分写法策略分析
★ GRE写作3阶段备考细节攻略指点Issue&Argue都要抓牢
★ gre高分作文
【GRE作文argument逻辑攻击点有哪些（通用21篇）】相关文章：
gre作文要写多少字2022-05-06
关于高分作文的写作小技巧2022-10-06
年终总结个人要写多少字2023-05-30
新手练笔GRE写作需注意这5种易错扣分问题2023-02-08
GRE考试写作技巧2022-07-21
研习GRE作文考试的优秀2022-05-07
GRE作文满分 现身说经验2023-05-29
高考日语作文要求多少字2022-10-22
GRE高分逆袭之战经验2022-07-31
GRE作文之写作原则不能丢2023-04-30