当前位置：首页 > 实用文档 > 其他范文> gre考试写作审题有什么方法呢

gre考试写作审题有什么方法呢

时间：2023-01-26 07:44:36 其他范文收藏本文下载本文

gre考试写作审题有什么方法呢（共7篇）由网友“五月可以吗05”投稿提供，以下是小编收集整理的gre考试写作审题有什么方法呢，仅供参考，希望对大家有所帮助。

gre考试写作审题有什么方法呢

篇1：gre考试写作审题有什么方法呢

gre考试写作审题有什么方法?

1.巧妙审题。

gre写作审题主要侧重两个方面：一是要弄清文章的文体和格式。审题不清，会导致格式不规范，作文要求不合格，甚至会因为跑题偏题而失分。二是要对文章的细节进行筛选。把有用信息按一定顺序分小点列出来，然后过滤掉无用信息。

2.构思词句。

根据gre考试审题步骤所列出的内容要点，列出以下内容：可能要用到的关键词语(如动词、短语等);可能用到的句型;可能用到的语句间的连接词;按内容要点顺序和所列词语、句型写出单句，同时将这些内容串联成句。

3.组织文章框架。

此gre写作考试步骤主要的作用是使整篇文章既有“骨架”，又有“血肉”。需要注意以下两点：一是要注意全文的时态运用，保持一致性;二是要讲究布局谋篇。恰当的段落划分，前后语句的连贯，句型的选择，连接词的运用都是考生需要考虑的内容。

4.检查完善。

文章完成之后要通读文章，检查前后内容是否连贯，语言是否畅通，段落划分是否分明，句型及连接词的运用是否恰当，时态运用是否一致，标点符号是否规范等等，保证文章逻辑清晰顺畅。

高分GRE写作提纲举例指导

19“If a society is to thrive, it must put its own overall success before the well-being of its individual citizens.”

.同意

1、个人成功是社会繁荣的基础，确保个人利益才能促进社会利益

社会成功首先体现在个体的 well-being，个体利益得到满足后(research; invention; business) 才有动力促进社会利益

2 、如果只注重社会整体的成功，而忽略社会成员的幸福，整体的成功也不会久远。比如，一个国家倾尽所有财力(impose high taxes)去研究外太空，而不去发展经济，导致人民生活困苦，即使研究很成功也不能说这个国家是繁荣的，相反还有可能造成社会的不稳定。

3、把个人利益放在首位，通过促进个人成功推动社会成功

business; economy 个人成功后有 drive and resources for social sucess

19T “If a society is to thrive, it must put its own overall success before the well-being of its individual

citizens.”

如果一个社会要繁荣就必须将社会整体的成败置于单个社会成员的幸福之上。

①首先，两者并不一定矛盾，可能同时发展

②当矛盾时，可能需要先牺牲一部分人的利益。

③长远来看，必须把个体利益放在社会利益之上。A 社会的发展是由一个个的个体所做出的。有责任使他们生活幸

福。否则，会引起** B 存在risk ，政府以社会的整体利益为借口来满足个人利益。

The achievement of social entire success owns much to ceaseless an d assiduous hard work of every citizen.

If a country overemphasizes the priority of its overall success in the process of thriving, it risks to obtaining the achievement at the expense of individual’s interest.

However, not every individual’s interest accords with th at of society.

Tim: A society is a community comprised by the members. It exists because its members exist. In my opinion, its overall success entirely depends on the welfare of its individual citizens. Such welfare should be prioritized.

Prior to our analysis, we need to agree upon the definition of “overall success”. Hypothetically, if we eliminate the elderly, the weak, the mentally and physically handicapped, and the unfit, then clearly our society consists of only healthy and intelligent members. It will likely become productive, and thus make considerable advancement.

Does this considerable advancement mean overall success? If it does, then we should indeed adopt a policy of master race, such as the one advocated by Nazis. We should place our emphasis on the society's success ahead of the welfare of individual members.

My definition of overall succe ss, however, is different. Rather, happiness of its members is the main criterion. If members are stressful throughout their life, this society is not deemed successful even if it enables its members to land on Mars.

Again, hypothetically, let us say that our world population is reduced from 6.2 billion to 100 million. All the unfit have been annihilated. These 100 million people are good looking, tall, smart, young, and healthy. Their earth is filled with bountiful food and is equipped with advanced technology. Now, let us examine the likelihood that they will be happy.

First, this master race still cannot defy agin g and death. The members will age and die. But according to their own regulations, people at the age of, say, 50 must be phased out. So, what do you think that those reaching ages of 35, 40, or 45 will feel?

Second, other than aging, the members do not dare to show any sign of weakness. If they are sick, they'd better pretend to be well. If they do not understand something, they will pretend that they are bright. If they are unable to accomplish some tasks, they will appear to be competent. So they constantly live in pretense and anxiety.

Finally, how will these cut-off limits of unfitness be defined? It is law of nature that nobody on earth is perfect. Nobody can possibly possess every nice attribute in him. If he is bright, but physically weak, will he be eliminated? The society will become chaotic, as there will be constant debates over the definition of unfitness.

In summary, based on three reason s stated above, members of this society will not likely live happy lives. If they will not, the society, deemed by me, is not successful. If I am allowed to uphold my own definition, then clearly we should accept every member, weak and strong alike, as he is, and prioritize his well being. The society does not necessarily have to make progress.

高分GRE写作提纲举例指导

20“National governments should devote more of their social programs and services to children than to adults.”

20 部分同意

1、为孩子建设社会项目和服务确实是应该的，因为孩子是国家的希望，决定了国家的未来，而且孩子的教育非常重要，决定了人的一生。

2、但是也应该为成人建设社会项目和服务，因为孩子需要成人的照顾，如果忽视了对成人的服务，可能间接会影响到孩子。比如当一个国家的失业率很高的时候，温饱都不能保证，就很难让孩子接受良好的教育了。

3、因为政府的精力是有限的，因此需要在两者之间把握一个平衡。

孩子和成人都很重要，但不可能付出大量精力，所以要平衡;assign priority according to the importance of the program; 失业服务项目优先于儿童after-class activity program; 儿童健康项目优先于garbage recycling programs

【Position 】: 尽管儿童的成长关系国家发展可持续性，但成人才是社会的中流砥柱，因此国家应该优先为成年人提供服务。

儿童关系到国家发展可持续性。儿童处在学习阶段，将来的他们为社会做出贡献。他们需要足够的政府投入，比如医疗，教育

但是成年人才是社会的根本。国防上确保国家安全，产业工人为社会创造财富，科技工作者推动科技进步

许多的社会问题都是由于成年人引起的，失业，老龄化，妇女权利，成人的这些问题不得到解决会影响政府的威信，妨碍社会稳定

政府应该把更多的重点放在成年人上，但不能忽视儿童的需要。以确保发展的可持续性。

20T “National governments should devote more of their social programs and services to children than to adults.”

.府为儿童所想所做应该比成人多。

①成人是社会财富的创造者，是社会的中坚力量。Adults, who make up the major work force of our society, are where the fortune and power of the nation lying, thus the premise of the social stability. 如：从古代的埃及金字塔、长城到现代的农民、工人或是白领阶层。从公平原理上来说，应该回报给他们一定的 programs and services.

②另一方面，许多社会问题的存在都是由于成人所引起的。如：老龄化，失业。要解决这些问题，就要给予成年人足够的关注。反面说：如果没满足，会引起人们对于政府、社会的不满。Faraway from the superficial impression that national government has set enough social programs and services to help adults, the fact is that, such help still can not meet the request and even worse is that some of them are not adequately conducted to bear the assumed outcomes.

③小孩应该给予足够的关注，A 因为是社会的未来。B 许多现在社会问题的解决要依靠今天对他们的教育。As we have to keep sufficient notice on adults’ affairs, we shall absolutely never fail to provide children a safe, clean and nice environment for them to grow happily and robustly.

总结：两者要平衡。

高分GRE写作提纲举例指导

21“Reform is seldom brought about by people who are concerned with their own reputation and social standing. Those who are really in earnest about reforming a government, an educational system, or any ot her institution must be willing to be viewed with disdain by the rest of the world.”

.部分同意

1、只顾自己的 reputation and social standing 的人无法带来真正的革命

rebellion instigated by farmers; finally yield to the governer who garentee the head of the rebels official oppsition and wealth

2、真正带来革命的人不关心自己的 reputation and so cial standing

Martin Luther King

3、带来革命的人也希望大家都来支持，而不是受轻视，否则革命很难成功

Mahatma Gandi

21T “Reform is seldom brought about by people who are concerned with their own reputation and social standing. Those who are re ally in earnest about reformin g a government, an educational system, or any other institution must be willing to be viewed with disdain by the rest of the world.”

.在乎自己声望和社会地位的人很少能带来改革。而那些真正想要改善一个政府、一个教育系统或者其他机构的人却必须要接受世界上其他人的蔑视。

① 因为改革总是对于利益的重新分配，因而不可避免的会引起一部分人的不满，所以想要改革的人不可避免的要接受一部分人的蔑视。如：对贵族 noble 权利的剥夺

② 在乎自己声望和社会地位的人是不能带来改革的。一方面，他们可能只是想被选举上，没想过要改革;另一方面，当改革遇到困难时，他们会倾向于退缩

③ 当改革的长远效果显示出来时，真正英明的人的声望会加倍。如：Gandhi， Roosevelt

Though no explicit static data, it’s not difficult to find that earnest in seeking personal reputation is always bound with eagerness to involve in social affairs such as reforming.

Then there seems to be a paradox, since earnest in social affairs always goes with ardor for personal reputation, how one manages to sacrifice the latter for the former?

Yet it’s unfair to ignore the contribution to any beneficial reforming of common people who may not show so much care for earnin g reputation or standing.

gre考试写作审题有什么方法

篇2：gre考试写作审题有什么方法

gre考试写作审题有什么方法?

1.巧妙审题。

2.构思词句。

3.组织文章框架。

4.检查完善。

GRE作文范文：多媒体教育

Although innovations such as video，computers，and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students，these technologies all too often distract from real learning.

GRE作文范文参考：

Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations have played in the field of learning. While most people think that innovations benefit learning process in various ways，different opinions arise that these technology advancements actually distract students from real learning. On balance，according to my personal observation，whether innovations can be beneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and the teachers，not on these innovations themselves.

To begin with，technological innovations do help teaching and learning in various ways.With the aid of these technologies，the process of teaching and learning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance，if a student want certain published papers of an academic discipline，he/she may look through considerable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However，with the help of Internet innovation，at present most of these papers are published online. Consequently，to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter， the students just type the key words and other information of the paper，and then the system will search the database，and the papers are there waiting for them. As this new approach can save a lot of time for the students，he/she could have more time reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking and looking for the papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptly illustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learning process.

Secondly，while innovations can help learning in various ways，it is more important that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms are maintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning. In India，where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process than in the US and other developed countries，still a lot of distinguished students achieved their academic goal with their hard work and desires to knowledge. In the US，where the software engineering students are given the most advanced facilities and apparatus for their learning and research，however，it is wildly accepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students of software，who may share computers in groups. From this comparison we can see that the real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge，not the help of innovations.

In addition，if not guided properly，the technology advancement might inhibit learning.In other words，innovation can distract the students from real learning than helping them. It is obvious that a computer can help students of science to calculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as net surfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spend more time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a computer. Thus，learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance，guidance and restrictions are needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning，or the consequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers' desire.

To conclude，technological innovations are beneficial to learning in many ways，but when using these technologies，one should not forget the real purpose of learning and remember not to be distracted for other usages of these innovations that are irrelevant or detrimental to learning. On balance，innovation here serves as a double-edges sword，and its right use is dependent on the students and the teachers.

GRE作文范文：事物不会一成不变

Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.

GRE作文范文参考：

Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.

To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.

However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.

Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.

To sum up，while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately，for the reason of the limitation of the abilities，I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves，as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis，I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable，we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.

GRE作文范文：如何避免偏激

Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.

GRE作文范文参考：

In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.

Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one

may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.

Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.

In the newly development software engineering model named Object-oriented model,the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as the core and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put into same “classes” and common points are processed together, later they are defined, discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics. This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and over again on similar, if not utterly same, terms. Translated into daily life, starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to grasp distinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we should always bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness and efficiency.

篇3：gre考试写作审题技巧接收

gre考试写作审题技巧接收

1. 写作宗旨

“老美是一个崇尚自由，个性，创造力，个人能力的国家，所以我们的立题最后也是偏向这一方面。从的出题倾向中可以很明显的感觉到这种偏好。对于很肯定的题目，不要脚踩两只船，要有自己鲜明的观点!(我觉得凭自己的水平是写不好两边都讨好的题目的，所以与其攻其十指，不如伤其一指。)

论点不要重复题目。由于我有时候找不出什么论点了，会把题目的再重复一遍，所以也想提醒一下和自己有相同毛病的g友，不要犯同样的错误。其实有时候可以把题目再读一遍，你就会有新的发现。”

2. 如何审题

“题目中的话说到绝对的，就diagree。比如题目中有这些词的as long as，anything，everything，all，only，我们可以把它们作为一个论点进行攻击，这是很容易找到反例的。我考试的时候就遇到了这样的情况：题目是：Practicality is now our GREat idol，which all powers and talents must serve. Anything that is not obviously practical has little value in today s world.可以看到题目中有三处很绝对的地方(all，anything，little )，一一反驳就是三个论点了。

题目对X.X不满，就agree。这种gre考试题目一般很明显的可以察觉到出题者的意图，所以你就跟着他不满。

若有比较，就顺着agree。题目中会出现诸如as...more...than...这样的词，看到了，你也可以顺着他的意思同意。

题目会很明显的提示你从哪些方面来写，比如说：In any realm of life--whether academic，social，business， or political--the only way to succeed is to take a practical，rather than an idealistic，point of view. Pragmatic behavior guarantees survival，whereas idealistic views tend to be superceded by simpler，more immediate options.你可以看到破折号里面的academic，social，business，or political，所以你就跟着他一个个举例子。”

3. 例子

“第一种是经典型：比如说Einstein，Newton，Galileo，Edison这些科学家的例子被用的烂了，不过也不失为好东西。the earth orbiting around the sun;Copernicus，Bruno等等。Picasso，Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky，Nixon Watergate等。

第二种是时尚型:为了与众不同，胜人一筹可以找一些新的例子。比如文艺类的，电影Matrix，可以用于arts;the project of Three gorges;High speed railway between Beijing and Shanghai;可以用于政治类的政府决策方面。以及写道Scandal时，Tony Blair和那个倒霉的武器核查专家也可以用。还有Iraq和USA的战争，朝鲜的核弹问题，都可以从不同侧面来分析。

我在准备过程中，每天看看yahoo网站的英语新闻，这样，不但可以了解最新的实事，练练泛读，还可以看到很多现代美语的用法以及一些不知道怎么表达的专业词汇，得益非浅。”

作文引用注意要点

1. 内容与GRE作文范文高度相似

官方说明：“text that is substantially similar to that found in one or more other GRE essay responses.”

每年的GRE考生们，为了更好的准备作文部分，会背诵大量的范围，学习和借鉴其中出彩的表达，但是千万注意，学习好词好句，不代表整段直接照搬到考卷上。

2. 部分句子来源于出版或未出版资料

官方说明：“quoting or paraphrasing,without attribution,language or ideas that appear in published or unpublished sources.”

大家若在一些材料中看到了一些词句并且想要在考试的时候引用，一定要正确的做注释，这一点非常的重要。

3. 观点来自他人

官方说明：“essays that are submitted as work of the examinee when the ideas or words have,in fact,been borrowed from elsewhere or prepared by another person.”

写作时的观点，一定要注意不能是与已存在的论点十分相似的，要基于自己的理解，给出和论点紧密联系的论据以支撑。

GRE写作高分范文：知识让事情变得神秘

As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and more mysterious.

当我们获得越来越多的知识，事情并没有变的更加透彻，相反是变的更复杂更神秘。

GRE写作范文：

With the development of the society, natural science and social science help people learn more about the world and the things seems to be clear, actually, under some circumstance, in-depth researches on things cause three consequences at the some time: comprehensible, complex and mysterious rather than merely understand.

Accumulated knowledge helps problems or theories to be expressed clearly and lucidly so that people feel easy to understand the issues. For example, Galileo, who was a famous Italian astronomer who despise the prejudices and book learning of the Aristotelians, who put his question to the nature instead of the ancient, and who drew his conclusion fearlessly. Eventually, his experiment and observation established a new theory and overthrew the old one from Aristotle. Because of his success and theories,people learn how to observe the sky with telescope and begin to understand another space, which is far from the earth. Obviously, without knowledge from Galileo’s theory, universe might also be a inspiration and even a vacancy. Take another scientist for example, Edison, who invented electric bulb by making thousand experiment and brought the society into a brilliant century. Recently, people live in a society which full of light and help them to learn what they can see and observe. With the revolution of human beings, knowledge solves various problems and creates a more comprehensible and comfortable life to the people.

However, those knowledge makes us to considered the reason and origin for human nature of curiosity, as a result, the world become increasingly complex. Take the same instance what have pointed above, although people learn to use telescope to observe the sky, people unsatisfied with such a “observation” and desire to touch with the outer space and understand other planets. In this case, scientists invented the spacecraft which have successfully landed on the Moon and Mars, after these experiments, people know that there are no water and few gravitation in Moon, and the Mas might have the similar condition of the earth. however, the complex problems come out, because people feel difficulty to explain the phenomena in the outer space.

Therefore, the research on astronomy becomes complex and involved. Not only this field, but also all scientific area becomes complicate. When people understand a surface of things, they will feel anxious to learn the core of them, however, the deeper people do researches, the more complications exist.

Additionally, in-depth learning causes desire of researching for mystery, which follows the existence of complication. Indeed, there are many uncanny problems in process of doing research when people hope to point out the reason of complex issue. For example, the construction of pyramid has been an enigma for a long time, because people fail to imagine that the ancient people can construct such a palatial with old and traditional method. Moreover, “black hole” would be a mysterious place that astronomers desire to touch and understand because no one know a little about this untouched field. Faced with these things, human nature motivates and stimulates people to purchase the reason and the secret.

In sum, people learn more about things by accumulating knowledge and then establish new theory and system, and at the same time, complex and mysterious problems exist simultaneously for the desire of exploring secret and untouched field-all of these constitute a process of learning and researching.

GRE写作高分范文：法律

题目：

It is possible to pass laws that control or place limits on people's behavior, but legislation cannot reform human nature. Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts and minds.

通过法律可以控制或者限制人们的行为，但是立法是无法改变人类本性的。法律无法改变人们的感情和思想。

GRE写作范文：

Ever since the Code of Hammurapi comes into being, laws have begun to put restrictions on people's behaviors and have played an important role in the maintenance of social order. But aside from its impact on shaping public deportment, legislation is of no avail to reform human nature as well as mankind thoughts.

Our collective life experience is that we make choices and decisions every day--under a legal system. No one is ever granted the rights to surpass the boundary of laws; otherwise there may be lack of protection for private property and personal right from being violated. Common sense tells us that the laws will punish the wrongdoers severely sometimes so harshly even to sentence the felons to death. It is the awe to controlling authority as well as the fear of castigation that made most of the people away from the illicit behaviors. Laws, for better or worse, have put up a paradigm on which people abide by, for the sake of personal interests and the social stability as well.

Laws can exert their influences on people’s “hands and legs”, but when it comes to man’s hearts and minds, it cannot. In the long history of its development, laws change over time and vary from region to region not to alter human nature but to be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times and places. The end of a legal system impels laws to evolve to keep pace with changing mores, customers, and our collective sense of equity but with little concern for the reconstruction of human thoughts. Bigamy, to be commonly regarded as illegal in most countries, is yet legitimate in some Arabian countries. For Islamic, outlawing bigamy seems an impinge upon their religious freedom of choosing mates. Instead of bringing about a revolution in the conception of marriage among Islamic disciples, laws give way to the entrenched customers. Still more, from the psychotic analysis angle, that laws will change nature is further doubted. Sigmund Freud has divided the individual personality into threefold: the id, the ego and the super ego. The ego, as the surface of the nature and the part you show the world, is governed by the “reality principle,” otherwise known as laws.

However, so powerless are laws to extend its impacts on the id and the superego remains below, each has its own significant effects on the personality. A rapist, for example, despite years of imprisonment may still relapse into outrages in that laws fail to civilize the id desires composing of instinctual drives. By no means can laws alone alter our nature. Were laws by itself be able to cause a change in the human nature and exercise a fundamental influence on people's hearts and minds, then it would probably be no need for its existence. People at no time can ever have imagined this.

In fact, to truly change the human nature, it is through the synergic efforts associating the education, moral and ethic social interactions altogether that brought about a reconstruction of human nature.

In conclusion, in spite the fact that we may live in a harmonious society with the implementation of the laws, it seems unthinkable for laws to undertake the role as a reformer in rebuilding man's nature as well as hearts and minds.

篇4：gre考试写作论证方法介绍

gre考试写作论证方法介绍

随着新gre写作考试的普及，越来越多的学校要求申请入学的学生提供这一分数，因为这是对考生真实写作能力的反馈。写作部分包括两部分：gre写作论证陈述你对某个问题的看法(写作时间为45分钟)和论点分析(写作时间为30分钟)。

要写出新gre考试的论证部分，首先要熟悉其思路和写作方法。有些人写GRE测试文章，喜欢使用专业的逻辑术语。其实，没必要一个人谈事情。为了变得强大，你可以使用句型，例如，有可能，很可能，因为论证是一个发现错误和发现错误的过程。如果你真的认为很难发现错误，你可以根据每个句子使用每个句子批。基本上，每句话中都可能有逻辑错误来表达原因。

1、论论据、论据和论据

有些人认为在GRE中，背诵错误的分类是可以的。但实际上，这些只是次要的方面。主要是要弄清楚论述者的论点和事实是否为论点提供了充分和必要的证据。只有找出自己的缺点和不足，文章才会流畅。掌握逻辑因果关系，更好地把握文章的结论，会写出一篇更漂亮的文章，而不仅仅是调查、回应、数据等大家使用的东西，无论什么东西更具体、更有说服力。

要注意论据之间的继承和发展，gre作文技巧,gre考试培训这也是文章微观逻辑性差的一个重要原因。一般来说，主论点的结论显然是分为论点的，但说到每一个具体段落，都会感觉到论点之后的论点突然出来，只是论点论点的结束，缺乏深入的分析和思考。这就要求我们在论据和论据之间的转换中加入一些适当的分析语言，并在适当的情况下在论据和每段的结论之间进行分析或推进。

2、论证方法

示例是第一个推荐的参数方法。首先，编写一个新的GRE作文不象做一道数学题：遵循公理法，一步一步地推进它。在现实世界中，只有少数东西是可以放在各个方向的，逻辑推理的方法往往使文章不那么有说服力。其次，推理往往比叙述需要更多的语言;如果你用英语写作，你就更容易犯错误。第三，虽然字数不是最重要的，但对于想要高分的学生来说，一定的字数是非常必要的;在字数上，以例句为准。

每个论点都有其独特性。关键是理解如何通过总结模板来讨论和反驳某一点，并说明问题的思路和针对性。有些题目，如果我们用例子来说明，会不会更好，事实胜于雄辩。

GRE的文章有说服力吗?事实上，举几个例子就足够了。例子必须能够充分证明论点，因为不恰当的例子几乎是每一篇文章的问题。关键是它能否灵活运用，是否能起到论证作用，我们身边最熟悉的例子是最生动、独特和有说服力的，尤其是对于教育。一般来说，最有说服力的句子不是那些普遍适用的句子。例子是非常个性化的东西。每个人都用同样的例子。有什么意义?例子的选择不一定是名人的名言名行，也不一定要投票给外国人的口味。有了国外的例子，身边的小事也可以做，这可以充分证明你的观点。

结合自己的生活和职业，多举一些例子。gre作文技巧,gre考试培训有两个很好的理由：首先，我对它很熟悉，而且我可以提出自己的观点。第二，我不需要花太多时间背诵自己的东西。当然，这并不是说你不需要扩展你的例子，而是有针对性地扩展它们。应该掌握一些可以广泛应用的例子。你可以找到如此广泛的储量的例子。

三、备考方略

首先，必须尽早开始限时练习。有很多人都以为刚开始写好一点花多长时间都值得其实到后来发现根本不是这样，限时和不限时两种感觉完全不同。限时之后就会发现，没有固定的套路在三十分钟内基本不可能完整的写出一篇从没见过的argument。这里的套路不是大家都熟知的在网上和书上流行的摸版。而是自己总结出来的一套写作模式，更重要的是思维模式。

一般不推崇使用模版，每个人要有自己的写作套路，别人的模版尽量不要直接拿来用，毕竟那些还是别人的东西，最好自己能弄出来自己的风格来。而写作套路，就是仁者见仁，智者见智的事情了，练习作多了，提纲列多了，基本就出来了。

其次，要勤写，多写。做事不但要讲效率，更要讲效果。写的多了未必就有效果，很可能是在重复以前早就写过的论点，早就用过的论据。关键在于写一篇要有一篇的效果。

第三，还要多改。gre作文技巧,gre考试培训写完之后立即改;自己改完之后再请别人改;放一段时间以后再回过头来自己改。修改多次之后自然会有提高。

最好，平时一定要注意积累。句型、短语和相关单词的收集和分类很重要。比如对教育类的主题，一些的单词和短语是比较有针对性的，单词和短语最好从报纸、网页、国外的范文里或者网上经典文章里搜集，如果自己乱猜乱凑可能适得其反，而且每次用都觉得心里七上八下。

GRE argument应如何进行有效分析

在GRE的备考过程中，很多同学拿到argument的时候不知道如何下手，虽然知道要去寻找其中的逻辑错误，但是具体如何寻找，找到之后如何处理却依旧很困惑。为了帮助同学们更好地去分析argument，一般我们拿到一篇argument之后，会对其中的证据进行如下的三步处理：

● Assumption：也就是文章中的evidence 要推到conclusion必须满足的条件。

● Weaken：指出有哪些细节和其他可能性的存在能够削弱这个推理过程。

● Strengthen：通过什么样的改变能够让argument的推理过程变得合理。

比如我们来看题库中的这样一道题：

The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe.

“A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away; thus, the proposed new jazz club in Monroe, the C-Note, would have the local market all to itself. Plus, jazz is extremely popular in Monroe: over 100,000 people attended Monroe's annual jazz festival last summer; several well-known jazz musicians live in Monroe; and the highest-rated radio program in Monroe is 'Jazz Nightly,' which airs every weeknight at 7 P.M. Finally, a nationwide study indicates that the typical jazz fan spends close to $1,000 per year on jazz entertainment.”

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

首先我们先找到作者的结论：

在Monroe建立爵士音乐俱乐部将会是非常盈利的产业。

接下来我们按照上面的方法去寻找文章中的每一条证据并进行分析：

前提1：人们愿意来新建的俱乐部C-Note

削弱：最近的爵士音乐俱乐部在65英里之外与人们会不会来C-Note没有关系。首先不知道人们有没有去65英里之外的这个club，即使人们去了是不是人们愿意在本地的C-Note消费。很有可能人们更愿意与陌生人一起分享音乐;或者C-Note的装修及音乐的选择等不能满足人们的需求。

加强：有证据表明当地人特别喜欢爵士乐并且愿意在当地消费。

前提2：去年夏天10万多人参加了Monroe的爵士音乐节，这意味着爵士乐在本地很受欢迎。

削弱：很有可能这10万多人都不是本地人，而是其他地区的人来本地参加某一个爵士音乐节，而之所以在Monroe举办音乐节也仅仅是因为这个地段更便宜;还有可能他们去参加爵士音乐节根本不是因为喜欢爵士音乐，而是这个音乐节是免费的，他们只是去凑个热闹。

加强：这10万多人大多数都是本地人，且是真正去欣赏爵士音乐。

前提3：若干知名的爵士音乐家居住在Monroe，这意味着该地区爵士乐流行。

削弱：这些爵士音乐家住在这里仅仅是因为这里环境优美，人口少，环境好;或者是因为这个地方的人其实不喜欢爵士音乐，因此不认识他们，他们不用担心自己的生活受到粉丝的打扰等。

加强：爵士音乐家住在这里是因为当地人喜欢爵士音乐。

前提4：Monroe获得评价最高的广播节目是平时每天晚上7点播出的“Jazz Nightly”，这意味着该地区爵士乐很流行。

削弱：很有可能同时段其他节目太差了，人们收听这个节目也仅仅是为了打发时间或者躲避更加恶俗的节目，这不代表人们喜欢爵士乐;可能这个节目在电台覆盖时间长，所以很多人在听这个节目;还有可能”Jazz Nightly”和C-Note的风格完全不一样。

加强：有证据表明人们是主动收听这档节目，并且与C-Note的风格相似。

前提5：全国性调查的结果是有效且准确的。

削弱：首先全国性的调查结果不能代表Monroe这个地方的情况，很可能这个地方的情况与全国其他的地区的情况是不一样的。而且这个调查很可能不是随机的，只是调查了一些相对富有的人，而该地区大多数人的整体收入是偏低的，所以人们可能不会花1000美元预算在爵士音乐上;还有可能该研究只涵盖了少数群体，所以也是没有说服力的。

加强：调查是科学有效且具有代表性的。

再比如说这样一道题：

The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company.

“Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home appliances, such as refrigerators and air conditioners, that are almost twice as energy efficient as those sold a decade ago. Also, new technologies for better home insulation and passive solar heating are readily available to reduce the energy needed for home heating. Therefore, the total demand for electricity in our area will not increase—and may decline slightly. Since our three electric generating plants in operation for the past twenty years have always met our needs, construction of new generating plants will not be necessary.”

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

作者结论：

没有必要建立新的发电站。

前提1：调查是真实有效的且户主渴望节能的意向能够转化为实际行动

削弱：调查的人数非常少，不具有代表性，比如说只调查了几个人，不能反映该地区的真实情况。调查对象不是随机选择的，如故意调查了一些社区里面的环保小卫士，他们当然会愿意节能减排。被调查者由于利益考虑可能不会说实话，如正在接受电台的采访，在摄像机面前肯定会承认自己的节能意向。而且人们渴望节能不一定会真正采取行动去节能。

加强：保证调查的有效性和代表性，并且证明人们的意向是可以转化为实际行动的。

前提2：生产商现在推出很多能效比前的电器高一倍的家用电器，房主必然会购买。

削弱：由于购买新的电器会带来额外的支出，可能这些居民家中以前的电器还可以继续使用，所以对于他们来说，购买新的家用电器是没有必要的。因此，商场即使在大力推广这些节能电器，但是居民的购买欲望可能很小。

加强：有证据表明商场的推销能够成功的说服消费者购买。

前提3：更好的房屋隔热和被动式的太阳能取暖的技术必然能得到应用。

削弱：很有可能更好的房屋隔热和被动式的太阳能取暖的技术由于成本过高，很多家庭不愿意采用;或者现在很多家庭房子都已经装修好了，如果要采用新技术的话需要重新改造线路什么的，特别麻烦，而且会带来附加成本，于是人们不会选择。

加强：有证据表明更好的房屋隔热和被动式的太阳能取暖的技术的成本完全在房主接受的范围之内，并且他们乐于接受这个额外成本，且房屋改造起来比较简单。

前提4：过去和现在的需求规律适用于未来。

削弱：虽然过去20年的用电需求可以满足，但是情况在未来可能发生变化，导致用电量的增加，比如未来化石燃料的减少导致人们不得不用电能取而代之，或者大功率用电的企业在本地出现。而且过去的三所发电站也有可能出现故障而导致供电不足。

加强：有证据表明未来的三所发电站的确可以保障用电需求且没有其他用电需求的增长。

GRE作文范文：Reclaiming Our Roots

Some cultures are more rooted to the earth and connected to their inherent spirituality. But every one of us, even those of us who have been disconnected from our roots for hundreds of years, comes from a place that was once inhabited by people who worshipped and honored the earth on which they lived. In other words, we can all claim this wisdom as an essential part of who we are.

One way we can begin to rediscover our roots is to explore the early earth-based religions practiced in the parts of the world that birthed our ancestors. If we explore the ancient spiritual practices of our ancestors, we will find that their practices and beliefs share many elements with Native American, African, and aboriginal religious traditions. People who are connected to the earth and honor her share a fundamental philosophy that we can claim as our own because we too are of the earth. Many of us have become so disconnected from the earth that it feels foreign and awkward to imagine communing with her or performing a ritual for her. If we are honest, though, we will find within ourselves a yearning to feel more connected, more grounded, and more at home in this world. This yearning can lead us back to our disowned roots, which, of course, leads us right into the heart of the earth.

As we begin to see more clearly the people we come from, we can begin to alter our perception of who we are now, laying claim to our inherent relatedness to the earth. We might celebrate this by observing the ancient calendar of solstices and equinoxes, celebrating and honoring the cycle of the seasons as our ancestors did, or we might explore any one of the many earth-based practices through reading or participating in ritual. When we do these things, we tap back into our roots, finding nourishment at the wellspring of our earthly origins, the source we share with all of humanity.

篇5：雅思写作审题方法

雅思写作审题方法

雅思写作过程中审题是非常重要的一关，只有大家在审题的时候掌握的雅思写作题目的真正含义，才能在接下来的写作中发挥自己的实力。下面为大家介绍一个雅思写作审题方法，就是从不同的角度来分析。

雅思作文跟国内写作一样都是话题作文，在紧张的时间里抓住题目思想进行立意是关键，雅思写作和国内的写作不同之处在于：

一、考题范围广并多涉及负面问题。

雅思考试的作文涉及教育、科技、犯罪、媒体、政府等各个方面。这是由英国的教育方式决定的`。国外多是小班教学，以讨论课为主。学生围绕一个topic，进行辩论、相互驳斥，以此锻炼学生的语言和思维能力。

例如：关于交通警察是否可以配枪的话题。这个问题反映了现实意义：当时的伦敦和柏林等地区有多处骚乱，而这个问题英国议会真的有辩论过。这就要求我们考生要关注国际环境，培养自己的国际视野。

二、重辩论能力。

雅思考试是国际性的考试，主要考察考生独立思考的能力，提倡提出质疑，只要能自圆其说就可以。这与中国传统的中庸之道完全不同。但是考生在提出自己的观点时要在理性判断的基础上，也不需要政治腔。如考题是否应该废除死刑。不管哪种都要以站得住脚的论证和角度来分析。建议就这个题，最好应和国际走势选择反对死刑，这也是所谓的国际视野。

篇6：GRE写作ISSUE作文审题破题展开方法

GRE写作ISSUE官方要求介绍

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

从这个instructions可以看出，我们绝不能单纯地从正负观点去展开文章。因为，它明确说了你需要在写作中讨论“命题”中的陈述在何种情况下成立“true”,在何种情况下不成立”not hold true”.如果你在写作时仍然持有单一观点，你最后的得分可想而知。但是，实际情况是，对于大多数中国考生来讲，他们往往受困于单一观点“黑白分明”的思维定式，不善于从多角度分析一个问题。而这里各位考生需要明白，ETS对于GRE高分作文有一个很重要也是最基本的要求，那就是complexity,也就是“立场和角度的多样化”。为了去应对这样的写作要求，小站教育老师在这里介绍几种实用且又符合instructions要求的破题方式。